How much did KENT RICHARD HOFMANN FOUNDATION IN grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 68% of KENT RICHARD HOFMANN FOUNDATION IN’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

task forcecaresaidscarehealthoutreach

2020

sanclinichealthaidshivcare

2021

clinichivresourceaids

2022

foodaids

2023

aids

2025

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$81,260

Median grant

States reached

$3.3M

Total assets

Largest grants

TO BE PROVIDED$81,260

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $26k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

50%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$262k · 37 repeat orgs$261k to everyone else

37 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$262k

$180k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%

+84%

Still filing today

68%

37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $81k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterArts & CultureEducationCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

BA
BIRMINGHAM AIDS OUTREACH
4× · 2018–2022 · $13k · revenue +247%
FF
FRIENDS FOR LIFE CORP
3× · 2021–2023 · $12k · revenue +43%
HH
HOPE HOUSE
4× · 2018–2021 · $12k · revenue +19%

Funded once

NI
NORTH IDAHO AIDS COALITIONgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +81%
FP
FRANNIE PEABODY CENTERgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +163%
LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY CLINICgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +126%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Aids Alabama Inc

Aids alabama devotes its energy and resources statewide to helping people with hiv/aids live healthy, independent lives and works to prevent the spread of hiv.

Health

Aidsnet Inc

Aidsnet builds healthier communities by planning and funding hiv/aids care and prevention

Health

Wellness Aids Services Inc

Provide education, support services, and prevention services for persons living with and at risk for hiv/aids.

Health

The Aids Institute Inc

The mission of The AIDS Institute is to promote action for social change through public policy, research, advocacy, and education.

Unclassified

Aids Assistance Program

The specific purpose of the AIDS Assistance Program is supplying nutritional support to low-income men, women, and children living with HIV/AIDS and other life threatening illnesses.

Health

The Philadelphia Center

Empower those living with hiv, eliminate new hiv transmissions, and enhance community wellness.

—

Aids Foundation Houston Inc

Aih's mission is to end the hiv epidemic in the greater houston area.

Health

Northern Nevada Hiv Outpatient Program

We provide affordable, high-quality medical, behavioral health & support services for all.

Health

Aids Arms Inc

Promoting health equity through education, prevention, research, and personalized healthcare.

Health

The American Academy of Hiv Medicine

To generate, apply and disseminate knowledge worldwide in the treatment and prevention of hiv/aids; to encourage and facilitate research in the field of hiv/aids; and to further support and facilitate and other purpose of aahivm which are…

Health

Aids Interfaith Network Inc

Aids Interfaith Network, Inc. AIN works to prevent the spread of HIV, and serves persons living with HIV and other vulnerable populations.

Health

Community Aids NetworkAkron Pride Initiative

Community AIDS Network/Akron Pride Initiatives mission is to prevent further transmission of HIV through education and risk reduction efforts and to provide housing assistance and other supportive services to people already affected by HIV.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hiv Alliance and the most unlike its peers is Maitri Compassionate Care. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/47

the rest of the field

11%

206,164/1,819,518

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

47 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

45/47

Grantees still filing

38/47

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$354,441Health$119,009Human Services$25,650Housing & Shelter$10,700Arts & Culture$5,550Education$4,015Civil Rights$3,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Broadway Caresequity Fights AIDS IncNY60.1× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Broadway Caresequity Fights AIDS Inc · The Mac AIDS Fund · The Elizabeth Taylor AIDS Foundation · The Estee Lauder Companies Charitable · AIDS United · The Pride Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Elton John AIDS Foundation Inc · Emory University · Pacificsource Foundation For · National Foundation for the Centers For · Delta Dental Community Care Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation KENT RICHARD HOFMANN FOUNDATION IN funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: NORTH IDAHO AIDS COALITION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~11 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 5 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

5 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +81% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 820509161 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on NORTH IDAHO AIDS COALITION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 11 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 3% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Kent Richard Hofmann Foundation In?

Find your warmest path to Kent Richard Hofmann Foundation In through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

KENT RICHARD HOFMANN FOUNDATION IN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

47 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Kent Richard Hofmann Foundation In?

More from the funding graph

KENT RICHARD HOFMANN FOUNDATION IN

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

47 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Kent Richard Hofmann Foundation In?

More from the funding graph