· Private foundation
Kent Richard Hofmann Foundation In
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $81,260 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $36k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
44 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 43 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- BABirmingham AIDS Outreach Inc5× · 2017–2022 · $16k · revenue +461%
- OAOPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA4× · 2021–2024 · $13k · revenue +41%
- FFFRIENDS FOR LIFE CORPORATION3× · 2021–2023 · $12k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- NINORTH IDAHO AIDS COALITIONgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $8k · revenue +67%
- FPFRANNIE PEABODY CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue +140%
LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY CLINICone grant, 2021 · $6k · revenue -10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provides housing and support services to individuals and families impacted by hiv/aids
Provide HIV/STD testing and support for those affected
Aids service center of lower manhattan, inc., d/b/a alliance for positive change ("alliance") is a not-for-profit community organization founded in 1990 with a central mission of helping low-income new yorkers living with hiv and other…
Mission is to provide housing, counseling and support services to hiv infected clients and their families wherein prudent decisions are made for their well being and their communities.
Aids project of the east bay (apeb) is focused on the prevention of the spread of hiv and supports individuals living with the virus through programs targeted at some of the most vulnerable and marginalized individuals. apeb seeks to…
To assess, assure and evaluate comprehensive support for people living with hiv/aids associated conditions, their caregivers and communities at large. to promote compassionate, nonjudgemental care, prevention, education.
Northern Nevada Hopes provides affordable, high-quality, medical, behavioral health, and support services for all. We are dedicated to building a healthier community by providing coordinated care and support for individuals and family…
Apo provides medical and social services to the community, with emphasis on underserved populations.
Hiv/aids counseling/assistance
Alianza's mission is to empower hard-to-reach, vulnerable, and underserved populations through education and supportive services aimed at working with everyone we serve to achieve better outcomes and higher quality of life.
To seek justice through health and housing.
Access Support Network saves and enhances lives of people in our community affected by HIV and Hep. C. It provides access to comprehensive critical services that empower its clients.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Aids Community Resources Inc D/B/a Acr Health and the most unlike its peers is Young Heroes Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
61 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 61 of the 103 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Birmingham AIDS Outreach Inc ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS FOR LIFE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH RESIDENCE D/B/A DOORWAYS ↗
- Who funds URSULINE PIAZZA ↗
- Who funds AIDS SERVICES OF AUSTIN INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH IDAHO AIDS COALITION ↗
- Who funds SHELTER HEALTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds PWA COALITION OF DALLAS INC ↗
- Who funds RED RIBBON PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Health Equity Alliance ↗
- Who funds BRIDGERCARE ↗
- Who funds Utah Aids Foundation ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR HOUSING AND HEALING ↗
- Who funds FRANNIE PEABODY CENTER ↗
- Who funds LAGUNA BEACH COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
- Who funds BOULDER COUNTY AIDS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Pierce County Aids Foundation ↗
- Who funds HOUSE OF MERCY INC ↗
- Who funds LIFTING UP WESTCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds NASHVILLE CARES ↗
- Who funds ALASKAN AIDS ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds RAIN Inc ↗
- Who funds VERMONT CARES ↗
- Who funds FOOD & FRIENDS INC ↗
- Who funds SEAN HUMPHREY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Project Transitions Inc ↗
- Who funds FOOD AND CARE FOR ALL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Broadway Caresequity Fights AIDS Inc · The Mac AIDS Fund · The Elizabeth Taylor AIDS Foundation · The Estee Lauder Companies Charitable Foundation · AIDS United · Emory University · Elton John AIDS Foundation Inc · The Pride Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Horizons Foundation · Direct Relief · Pacificsource Foundation for Health Improvement
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Kent Richard Hofmann Foundation In funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hiv Alliance — 54% of income from government
- Delaware Hiv Services Inc — 40% of income from government
- Aids Support Group of Cape Cod Inc — 33% of income from government
- Cascade Aids Project — 13% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Kent Richard Hofmann Foundation In?
Find your warmest path to Kent Richard Hofmann Foundation In through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.