· Private foundation
The Keith Haring Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k14 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k57 grants · $1.5M
- $50k–250k26 grants · $1.9M
- $250k+4 grants · $2.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BARD COLLEGE | $1,502,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK | $300,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $300,000 |
| ELIZABETH GLAZER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL CENTER FOR TRANSGENDER MEDICINE | $200,000 |
| NEW MUSEUM | $129,000 |
| ALI FORNEY CENTER | $127,591 |
| THE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC | $115,000 |
| GAY MENS HEALTH CRISIS INC | $102,000 |
| SAFE PASSAGE PROJECT CORPORATION | $100,000 |
| SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE | $75,000 |
| SERVICES & ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN & TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC | $75,000 |
| ACTION AGAINST HUNGER | $75,000 |
| ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN | $75,000 |
| SERVICES FOR THE UNDERSERVED INC | $60,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 86% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
77 repeat relationships — 53 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 47 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
BARD COLLEGE3× · 2021–2024 · $2.4M · revenue +118%- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC3× · 2020–2023 · $2.0M · revenue +64%
- WMWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART4× · 2020–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +69%
Funded once
- LCLGBT CENTERone grant, 2021 · $3.7M
- CHCOMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC (CALLEN-LORDE)one grant, 2022 · $500k
- DWDOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS USA INC (MEDICINS SANS FRONTIERES)one grant, 2022 · $300k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…
Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…
The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The alliance leads new york citys mission to end sexual violence through education, prevention programming, research, and policy change. until we end sexual violence in all forms, we will be here for all survivors and the organizations…
For over 150 years, the 92nd street y, new york has been serving its communities and the larger world by bringing people together (continued on schedule o)and providing exceptional, groundbreaking programs in the performing and visual…
Argus community's mission is to provide innovative programs which help severely disadvantaged teens and adults to free themselves from poverty and drug abuse and build new lives based on responsibility, work, and hope. argus provides a…
The municipal art society of new york (mas) lifts up the voices of the people in the debates that shape new york's built environment and leads the way to a more livable city from sidewalk to skyline. mas envisions a future in which all new…
We are committed to helping people with intellectual (cont. on schedule o) and developmental disabilities to live full lives.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Project Renewal Inc and the most unlike its peers is Art Resources Transfer Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 37 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.6% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
172 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 172 of the 215 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds ELIZABETH GLASER PEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
- Who funds PERFORMANCE SPACE 122 INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds GAY MEN'S HEALTH CRISIS INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE PASSAGE PROJECT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds THE DOOR - A CENTER OF ALTERNATIVES INC ↗
- Who funds New Museum of Contemporary Art ↗
- Who funds ASSOCIATION TO BENEFIT CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNT SINAI HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds GOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC ↗
- Who funds MARIAN AND EDWARD MACDOWELL INC ↗
- Who funds SERVICES AND ADVOCACY FOR GAY LESBIAN BISEXUAL AND TRANSGENDER ELDERS INC ↗
- Who funds ALI FORNEY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE PARTNERSHIP TO END HOMELESSNESS INC ↗
- Who funds ACTION AGAINST HUNGER - USA ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
- Who funds CITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS ↗
- Who funds PROJECT HOSPITALITY INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL CENTER OF PHOTOGRAPHY ↗
- Who funds THE BROOKLYN INSTITUTE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds FUTURES IGNITE INC ↗
- Who funds LATINO U COLLEGE ACCESS INC ↗
- Who funds HOUSING WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Brooklyn Community Foundation · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Pierre & Tana Matisse Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · Altman Foundation · United Way of New York City
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Keith Haring Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- North Jersey Aids Alliance Inc — 26% of income from government
- Portland Institute for Contemporary Art — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Keith Haring Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Keith Haring Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.