Skip to content

Ohio · Nonprofit

DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS)

DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS) (Ohio) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,140,119 to it, the largest being THE CALIFORNIA ENDOWMENT ($2,217,619). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$582k
Funders on record
16
Grants received
$3.1M
Net assets
$-259486
4/16 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 59%
01What it does

What Digital Organizing Power-Building and Engagement Labs (Dope Labs) does

Mission

Builds power and self-determination by centering community voice and reimagining design innovation with the world's most vulnerable populations (bipoc, disabled, rural, lgbqtia, etc.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Maternal health care, community driven technology platform:partnering with maternal mental health now implement a culturally and community responsive engagement process and technology tool (streetwyze) that provides new opportunities for vulnerable populations to use local knowledge and local data to build healthier communities, re-imagine maternal mental health equity, and better connect to maternal mental health resources in los angeles.integrated the maternal mental health now resource directory with streetwyze to product an open access and community relevant tool for finding maternal resources; completed 10 community trainings on the new platform; and onboarding 100+ new community users.

    $75,024 spent$6,803 earned by the program
    24% of program spending
  2. Childhood obesity, food equity, and justice, community technology platforms:partnering with ucsd, we implemented the streetwyze platform to utilize an exploration, preparation, implementation, and sustainment (epis) framework to advance community-based precision approach to aces while systematically examining community, organizational, family, and individual factors that impact implementation and individual response treating comorbid childhood obesity.0+ community organizations partnerships; 20+ community trainings on streetwyze; 5,000+ streetwyze data points collected by community users.

    $95,965 spent$8,702 earned by the program
    31% of program spending
  3. Climate resilience measurement, community resource sharing through technology platforms:partnering with uta and eecho, this project examined how crowdsourced mobile data can be leveraged to (1) improve the spatiotemporal characterization of factors that influence community resilience to flood disasters, (2) develop new metrics that account for the dynamic social and physical nature of resilience, and (3) encourage more equitable capacity-building that reduces the impacts of future flood hazards and enhances disaster resilience across all segments of the population.25+ community trainings on streetwyze; 50+ community users; 200+ data points in the gulfport area around stormwater management and resilience

    $54,837 spent$4,972 earned by the program
    18% of program spending
  4. Partnering with ucsd, we implemented the streetwyze platform with community based organizations across san diego county to collect data on the social determinants of health to explore solutions that will advance health literacy amongst low income and immigrant communities.5 community organization partnerships, 7 community trainings on streetwyze, 2,000 data points collected by community users

    $43,870 spent$3,978 earned by the program
    14% of program spending
  5. During the duration of this project, we provided ongoing project management and design around community engagement, leading in-person streetwyze trainings to community groups from gulfport, biloxi, and harrison county as well as uta staff, ongoing technical assistance for using the streetwyze platform to gather data during the project, providing a streetwyze license to uta for 10 months during the project, moderating data collection, and analyzing and reporting on data findings.

    $26,842 spent$2,434 earned by the program
    9% of program spending
  6. During the duration of this project, dope labs provided ongoing project management and community engagement support for the streetwyze safety mapping initiative in partnership with roots community health center. Activities included recruitment and training support for 10 community leaders, facilitation of streetwyze trainings, development of mapping prompts and outreach materials, ongoing technical assistance for use of the streetwyze platform, support for community-based data collection and quality assurance, participation in community events, and analysis and reporting on community safety data collected through the project in sobrante park and surrounding neighborhoods. 10 community leaders were trained to use the streetwyze platform and each engaged at least 3 additional community members in participatory mapping activities focused on neighborhood safety, civic engagement, and community-driven solutions. Participants collected and shared community stories, expanded outreach through peer recruitment, and supported broader resident engagement in data collection efforts.

    $12,612 spent$1,144 earned by the program
    4% of program spending

The 6 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $309,150.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($867k) Expenses 100 ($929k) Net assets 100 ($355k)2019 Revenue 116 ($1.0M) Expenses 91 ($843k) Net assets 145 ($516k)2020 Revenue 254 ($2.2M) Expenses 123 ($1.1M) Net assets 347 ($1.2M)2021 Revenue 76 ($656k) Expenses 135 ($1.3M) Net assets 180 ($638k)2022 Revenue 38 ($330k) Expenses 184 ($1.7M) Net assets -209 ($-741627)2023 Revenue 58 ($503k) Expenses 75 ($693k) Net assets -74 ($-263135)2024 Revenue 20 ($174k) Expenses 47 ($439k) Net assets -149 ($-528066)2025 Revenue 67 ($582k) Expenses 51 ($473k) Net assets -73 ($-259486)
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (67)Expenses (51)Net assets (-73)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $1.5M to $61k (−96%).

$451k
$664k
$1.4M
$787k
$789k
$1.5M
$61k
$408k
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2018 18% · 2024 36% · 2025 95%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

95% of DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS)’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (54% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,338 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$61k
’18
$161k
’19
$1.1M
’20
−$595k
’21
−$1.4M
’22
−$190k
’23
−$265k
’24
$109k
’25
9.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Antwi Akom

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed76786554
Joined·+0+1+1+0+0+0+0
No longer listed·1002101
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2022: the base narrowed from 7 funders to 3 funders, grant income fell $867k → $192k.

4 of 16 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 3% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS)’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS) leans on a few funders — its largest provides 71% of grant income and the top three 91%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

71%
largest funder
91%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 58% · 2018 56% · 2019 91% · 2020 96% · 2021 81% · 2022 77% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

18% of DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS)'s funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 25% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2022, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS) draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Ohio, across 6 states in all.

WA
MI
NY
CT
CA
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
Ohio out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $102k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS) runs a healthier operating margin than half of the 1,448 employment nonprofits its size.

Operating margin19% · above the median
Months of reserve9.8mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−6% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,448 employment nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Government funding DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS) receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $1.1M on record.

Federal$1.1M
grants $1.1Mcontracts $0
24
25
Top agencies
  • Department of Health and Human Services$1.1M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS)

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Ohio

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

65% of spending goes to programs.

Program 65%Management 35%Fundraising 0%

Governance

4
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990–Audited financials

Public support

98%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Dope-Digital Tech Labs · corp_trust

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS): IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS)?
DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS) (Ohio) receives grants from 16 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,140,119 to it, the largest being THE CALIFORNIA ENDOWMENT ($2,217,619). 4 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS) have?
IRS filings report 16 organizations giving $3,140,119 in grants to DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS), 4 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS)?
THE CALIFORNIA ENDOWMENT is the largest funder on record, with $2,217,619 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like DIGITAL ORGANIZING POWER-BUILDING AND ENGAGEMENT LABS (DOPE LABS) find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Ohio. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Digital Organizing Power-Building and Engagement Labs (Dope Labs) →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 16 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing