Loading…
Loading…
Georgia · Nonprofit
CHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD (Georgia) is funded by 64 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $8,595,640 in grants to it, the largest being THE AEM FOUNDATION ($1,170,000). 33 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
CHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD holds deeper cash reserves than three-quarters of the 2,451 recreation & sports nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,451 recreation & sports nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
71% of CHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (13% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
The base broadened — 3 funders to 4 as grant income moved $32k → $175k.
12 of 64 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 22% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of CHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 64 funders by total. Association, not causation.
CHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 14% of grant income, and it takes 6 funders to reach half.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 6 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 93% · 2018 41% · 2019 79% · 2020 83% · 2021 31% · 2022 17% · 2023 39% · 2024 26% · 2025 86% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
28% of CHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 52% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
CHASTAIN HORSE PARK LTD is locally rooted: 81% of its grant income comes from Georgia funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 64 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
88% of spending goes to programs.
61%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 1 state
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 64funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing