· Private foundation
The Patricia Kind Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $72k
- $10k–50k161 grants · $3.3M
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
- $250k+1 grant · $250k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SHARE Food Program | $250,000 |
| Edovo Foundation | $50,000 |
| Compass Pro Bono | $40,000 |
| Uplift Solutions Inc | $25,000 |
| Federation of Neighborhood Centers | $25,000 |
| Urban Affairs Coalition | $25,000 |
| St Christopher's Foundation | $25,000 |
| 12 PLUS | $25,000 |
| Depaul USA Inc | $25,000 |
| Greene Street Friends School | $25,000 |
| Small Things Inc | $25,000 |
| Movement Alliance Project | $25,000 |
| St Joseph's University | $25,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $25,000 |
| Providence Center | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 72% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
232 repeat relationships — 125 still active in FY2024, 107 since wound down; 34 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $710k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSHARE FOOD PROGRAM4× · 2021–2024 · $800k · revenue +8%
- FOFEDERATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS4× · 2021–2024 · $258k · revenue +108%
- FTFACE TO FACE INC4× · 2021–2024 · $93k · revenue +16%
Funded once
- ITIt Takes Philly Encouraging andone grant, 2021 · $50k
- GPGreater Philadelphia Young Men's Christian Associationgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $50k · revenue +38%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · $50k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.
Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.
To combat community deterioration and promote education.
Public Trust is a non-profit organization on the campus of the University of Pennsylvania that fosters learning, creativity, and collaboration in support of justice and equality.
Our mission is to advance bold ideas for the built environment in the City of Philadelphia and the surrounding region, with a specific focus on transformative projects and ideas in the areas of housing, infrastructure, and energy.
Pca promotes healing and justice for sexually abused children in philadelphia. using a multidisciplinary approach, we collaborate with our partners in child protection, law enforcement, and medical and mental health services to provide…
Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.
Friends of the children philadelphia has a mission of impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships and professional mentors 12+ years, no matter what. 92% go on to enroll in…
To empower young adults (17-20 year-olds) to develop skills and connect to opportunities by fostering an environment of love, support, and respect for their whole person. students graduate high school and successfully transition to college…
The mission of the urban league is to empower disadvantaged, underresourced and marginalized communities to secure economic self-reliance, parity, power and civil rights.
Heights is a new kind of organization, an economic mobility catalyst. we believe that creating pathways to educational and workforce success for low-income, black and brown, and first-generation-to-college students is the keystone of a…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Graduate Philadelphia and the most unlike its peers is Gender Justice Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 20 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
277 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 277 of the 356 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SHARE FOOD PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds FEDERATION OF NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERS ↗
- Who funds URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION ↗
- Who funds MOVEMENT ALLIANCE PROJECT ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA YOUTH NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds FACE TO FACE INC ↗
- Who funds PATHWAYS TO HOUSING - PA ↗
- Who funds BETHESDA PROJECT ↗
- Who funds MIGHTY WRITERS ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY PHILADELPHIA HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BIG PICTURE PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds CB COMMUNITY SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds Philadelphia Youth Action Inc ↗
- Who funds PUENTES DE SALUD ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN LEGAL CLINICS OF PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds Lancaster Avenue 21st Century Business Association ↗
- Who funds RUBYE'S KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTER HORIZON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF COMPASS INC ↗
- Who funds Love Pray Peace Project ↗
- Who funds 12 PLUS ↗
- Who funds TREE HOUSE BOOKS ↗
- Who funds COLLECTIVE CLIMB ↗
- Who funds DISCOVERY PATHWAYS ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds PREVENTION POINT PHILADELPHIA INC ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds WEST PHILADELPHIA ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds THE HAND2PAW FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ACHIEVEABILITY ↗
- Who funds CODED BY ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA YOUTH SPORTS COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds HIAS and Council Migration Service of Philadelphia Inc ↗
- Who funds Germantown Avenue Crisis Ministry ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The William Penn Foundation · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · Connelly Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Adam and Maria Sarah Seybert Institution for Poor Boys and Girls · Independence Foundation · Scattergood Behavioral Health Foundation · Union Benevolent Association
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Patricia Kind Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Petey Greene Program Inc — 29% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.