· Private foundation
Claneil Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k65 grants · $201k
- $10k–50k60 grants · $1.6M
- $50k–250k34 grants · $2.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOOD CONNECTS | $120,000 |
| COATESVILLE YOUTH INITIATIVE | $101,000 |
| THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA | $100,000 |
| CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK | $93,500 |
| ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION NETWORK | $85,000 |
| STEP NATION | $85,000 |
| BOND - BUILDING OUR NATION'S DAUGHTERS | $85,000 |
| FINEQUITY | $83,000 |
| ARRAY EDUCATION | $81,000 |
| OKAYSO | $80,200 |
| UPCHIEVE | $80,000 |
| THE MARCY LAB SCHOOL | $77,500 |
| INNER CITY GREEN TEAM ECONOMIC & ENVIRONMENTAL DEVELOPMENT | $75,000 |
| PURPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC | $75,000 |
| THE URBAN WILD | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
214 repeat relationships — 104 still active in FY2024, 110 since wound down; 51 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 76% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $995k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CYCOATESVILLE YOUTH INITIATIVE7× · 2017–2024 · $592k · revenue +16%
- CCCHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK7× · 2017–2024 · $561k · revenue +138%
- GOGREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP7× · 2017–2023 · $420k · revenue ×16
Funded once
- HSHEALING SCHOOLS PROJECTone grant, 2023 · $85k
- MFMENTOR FOR PHILLY (DBA COLLEGE TOGETHER)one grant, 2022 · $75k
- BMBOSTON MEDICAL CENTER - STREETCREDone grant, 2022 · $65k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of pennfuture is to lead the transition to a clean energy economy in pennsylvania and beyond. pennfuture is protecting our air, water and land, and empowering citizens to build sustainable communities for future generations.
Pidc plans and implements economic development initiatives (see schedule o) which enhance the competitive environment, generate jobs and produce higher tax ratables throughout philadelphia.
Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
Visit philadelphia is our name and our mission. as the region's official tourism marketing agency, we build greater philadelphia's image, drive visitation and boost the economy.
Building support for the rights of working people through coalitions of labor and community and through public education.
Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…
Pidc dmc administers and coordinates various development projects for the city and other not-for-profit entities.
The corporation's mission includes, but is not limited to, combatingcommunity deterioration within chinatown; preserving and developingthe chinatown community; leading the community in neighborhoodplanning, considering land use, and…
Our mission is to solve hunger in central pennsylvania by ensuring that everyone struggling with hunger has access to enough wholesome food every day. we will achieve this bold goal with the help of our generous donors, volunteers and…
PA United organizes and builds power across Western PA to create
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs (See) Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gender Justice Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
381 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 381 of the 487 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds COATESVILLE YOUTH INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds CHESTER COUNTY FOOD BANK ↗
- Who funds GREENWAVE ORGANIZATION CORP ↗
- Who funds FOOD CONNECTS ↗
- Who funds DREAMING OUT LOUD INC ↗
- Who funds ABOUT FRESH INC ↗
- Who funds ONE ELEUTHERA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S VOICES FOR THE EARTH ↗
- Who funds MARCY LAB INC ↗
- Who funds THE FUND FOR WOMEN AND GIRLS ↗
- Who funds UPCHIEVE INC ↗
- Who funds THE MODERN CLASSROOMS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds FARM FRESH RHODE ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds Found in Translation Inc ↗
- Who funds SOUL FIRE FARM INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ECOTECHNOLOGY INC ↗
- Who funds Salvation Farms Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMONWEALTH KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds Youth Design Center Inc ↗
- Who funds MINDRIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds COACHING FOR CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON AREA GLEANERS INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH AMERICAN MARINE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds INNER CITY GREEN TEAM ECONOMIC AND ENVIROMENTAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds TRASH FREE MARYLAND CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds URBAN WILD INC ↗
- Who funds THE FOOD TRUST ↗
- Who funds BLACK FARMER FUND INC ↗
- Who funds 412 FOOD RESCUE INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD RECOVERY NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds REENTRY CAMPUS PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds PURPLE HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Philabundance ↗
- Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds REACH EDUCATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc · Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · The Leo and Peggy Pierce Family Foundation Inc · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · The Gordon Charter Foundation · Independence Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · Grace S and W Linton Nelson Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Claneil Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Delaware Center for Homeless Veterans Inc — 100% of income from government
- Salvation Farms Inc — 26% of income from government
- More Than Words Inc — 24% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Foodcorps Inc — 21% of income from government
- Boston Area Gleaners Inc — 20% of income from government
- Food Connects — 15% of income from government
- Just Roots Inc — 15% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Intervale Center Inc — 13% of income from government
- Center for an Agricultural Economy Inc — 12% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Center for Ecotechnology Inc — 9% of income from government
- Commonwealth Kitchen Inc — 9% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Coaching for Change Inc — 5% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Fusion Partnership Inc — 3% of income from government
- Shelburne Farms — 3% of income from government
- Commonwealth Zoological Corporation D/B/a Zoo New England — 2% of income from government
- Infact Dba Corporate Accountability — 0% of income from government
- Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.