· Private foundation
Suffolk Cares Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k27 grants · $110k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $401k
- $50k–250k14 grants · $1.6M
- $250k+3 grants · $892k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $392,000 |
| NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY | $250,000 |
| NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION | $250,000 |
| RON BURTON TRAINING VILLAGE | $220,000 |
| WORLD TRADE CENTER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC | $200,000 |
| CAMPAIGN FOR CATHOLIC SCHOOLS | $200,000 |
| SAINT CECILIA PARISH | $150,000 |
| BOSTON BRUINS FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| THE BOSTON FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| COREY C GRIFFIN FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| NICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION | $100,000 |
| MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL | $51,000 |
| UNITED SERVICES ORGANIZATION | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
175 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2024, 131 since wound down; 25 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $399k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC8× · 2017–2024 · $1.7M · revenue +229%
- CHChildren's Hospital Corporation5× · 2017–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +69%
- NHNORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION5× · 2017–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +17%
Funded once
- CCCAPE COD HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $1.0M
- CCCAPE COD HEALTHCAREone grant, 2017 · $1.0M
- BCBoston Charitable Trust Fund City of Boston Trust Officeone grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue -100%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Neighborhealth's mission is to promote and sustain healthy communities, families, and individuals by providing accessible, person-centered, and compassionate, high-quality health care services to all who live and work in our service area,…
Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.
Patient care, teaching, research and serving the community.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Boston university affiliated physicians, inc.'s (buap) primary mission is to provide health care services in a manner that promotes health for the benefit of the community, to perform medical and clinical research in the public interest,…
Commonwealth care alliance, inc.'s mission is to improve the health and well-being of people with significant needs by innovating, coordinating and providing the highest quality, individualized care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Lenny Zakim Fund and the most unlike its peers is Grealish Boxing Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
359 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 359 of the 496 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Ron Burton Training Village Inc ↗
- Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
- Who funds COREY C GRIFFIN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EDWARD M KENNEDY INSTITUTE FOR THE UNITED STATES SENATE INC ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds WORLD TRADE CENTER PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Boston Charitable Trust Fund City of Boston Trust Office ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MEDAL OF HONOR MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY MIAMI INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS) ↗
- Who funds SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds THE MCCOURT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds GAVIN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Bowdoin College ↗
- Who funds CURRY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF DORCHESTER INC ↗
- Who funds NICK'S KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy ↗
- Who funds REGIS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds EMERSON COLLEGE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Yawkey Foundation II · The New England Patriots Charitable Foundation Inc · Highland Street Connection and Subsidiaries · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Rockland Trust - Blue Hills Charitable Foundation · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Suffolk Cares Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Urban League of Greater Springfield Inc — 81% of income from government
- South Shore Peer Recovery Inc — 71% of income from government
- The Mass Mentoring Partnership Inc — 63% of income from government
- Boston Harbor Now Inc — 45% of income from government
- Museum of African American History Inc — 43% of income from government
- St Mary's Center for Women & Children Inc — 40% of income from government
- The Home for Little Wanderers Inc — 38% of income from government
- Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center Inc — 38% of income from government
- Joslin Diabetes Center Inc — 35% of income from government
- Verse Video Education — 35% of income from government
- Louis D Brown Peace Institute Corp — 32% of income from government
- Bridge Over Troubled Waters Inc — 32% of income from government
- Bluehub Capital Inc — 32% of income from government
- Health Care for All Inc — 29% of income from government
- International Institute of New England Inc — 24% of income from government
- United Way Miami Inc — 23% of income from government
- Building Pathways Inc — 23% of income from government
- United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- HomeStart Inc — 20% of income from government
- Greater Lowell Community Foundation Inc — 18% of income from government
- Saint Francis House Inc — 18% of income from government
- Uss Constitution Museum Inc — 17% of income from government
- Heading Home Inc — 17% of income from government
- The Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro South Inc — 13% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Gavin Foundation Inc — 12% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Action for Boston Community Development Inc — 11% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Women's Lunch Place Inc — 8% of income from government
- Piers Park Sailing Center Inc — 8% of income from government
- Citizen Schools Inc — 8% of income from government
- Boston Health Care for the Homeless Program Inc — 8% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester Inc — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Digital Ready Inc — 6% of income from government
- Gosnold Inc — 5% of income from government
- South Shore Hospital Inc — 5% of income from government
- The Community Builders Inc — 4% of income from government
- Longwood Symphony Orchestra Inc — 4% of income from government
- Impact Melanoma Inc — 3% of income from government
- The Family Center Inc — 3% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- Regis College — 2% of income from government
- Artists for Humanity Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Red Sox Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Childrens Museum — 1% of income from government
- Madison Park Development Corporation — 1% of income from government
- Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- American International College — 1% of income from government
- The Baseball Inc — 1% of income from government
- Lahey Clinic Inc — 1% of income from government
- Suffolk University — 1% of income from government
- Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Architectural College — 1% of income from government
- One Family Inc — 1% of income from government
- Franciscan Hospital for Children — 0% of income from government
- Curry College — 0% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Hebrew Senior Life Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Arts Academy Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Baystate Health Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Museum of Fine Arts — 0% of income from government
- Emerson College — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Steppingstone Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.