· Community foundation
Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc
In partnership with donors, sioux falls area community foundation (sfacf) provides philanthropic leadership that assures the quality of life in our area, for good, for ever.the community foundation cultivates philanthropy by inspiring new generations of donors to nurture sioux falls' position as a nationally recognized charitable…
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 308 grants below total $37,969,740 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $38,909,054 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $939,314 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k45 grants · $316k
- $10k–50k158 grants · $3.3M
- $50k–250k78 grants · $7.9M
- $250k+27 grants · $26M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SIOUX FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT #49-5 | $7,010,169 |
| AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY | $3,517,321 |
| CITY OF SIOUX FALLS | $2,608,224 |
| DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $1,210,000 |
| BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $1,108,750 |
| CENTRAL CHURCH | $1,030,505 |
| VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT | $969,400 |
| LIFESCAPE FOUNDATION | $885,798 |
| SIOUX EMPIRE UNITED WAY - | $764,513 |
| CATHOLIC COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR EASTERN SD | $697,836 |
| SANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION | $593,426 |
| COMPASSION CHILD CARE | $500,839 |
| ALEXANDRIA TECHNICAL & COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| SIOUX FALLS ZOO & AQUARIUM | $488,689 |
| SIOUX FALLS THRIVE | $454,610 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $18.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 5% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 5% of Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 92% of the giving stays in SD; read by stated purpose it is 88% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
362 repeat relationships — 236 still active in FY2025, 126 since wound down; 63 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- DSDAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION7× · 2017–2025 · $22M · revenue +200% · 91% of their budget
- AUAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION9× · 2017–2025 · $11M · revenue +79%
- SHSANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $10M · revenue +262%
Funded once
- ISIOWA STATE FAIR FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +309%
- RHRV-MH HERITAGE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2021 · $200k · revenue -19%
- WCWAGNER COMMUNITY SWIMMING POOL INCone grant, 2024 · $200k · 91% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advancing healthy communities through a unified voice across the health care continuum.
In partnership with donors, sioux falls area community foundation (sfacf) provides philanthropic leadership that assures the quality of life in our area, for good, for ever.the community foundation cultivates philanthropy by inspiring new…
Sanford health is committed to the healthcare needs of communities throughout the upper midwest. sanford health provides a full range of primary and specialty healthcare services and strives to be the premier rural health system in the…
Building enduring relationships that maximize advocacy and philanthropy to support North Dakota State University.
Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…
Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.
Common paymaster for university of south dakota sanford school of medicine residents.
To offer leadership, involvement and support; encouraging the membership to professionally achieve their goals and serve all in the spirit of the golden rule.
The association works to promote member credit unions as being safe and sound institutions for insured deposits, responsible lending, and the best place for consumers to receive financial services.
The university of iowa facilities corporation acquires and holds property for the benefit and use of the university of iowa.
To serve the rural electric cooperatives in south dakota, to promote the effective development of rural electrification in south dakota on a cooperative, non-profit basis.
Engages, equips and empowers learners to explore their vocations, fulfill their potential and serve the world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lifelight Communications Inc and the most unlike its peers is Emo Ya Mmbembe Mmbondo Usa Or Emmus. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
413 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 413 of the 638 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FACE IT TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASSION CHILD CARE ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON PAVILION MANAGEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds SIOUX FALLS ZOO & AQUARIUM ↗
- Who funds SIOUX EMPIRE UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds BLACK HILLS STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Avera McKennan ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FDN OF GREATER DES MOINES F/K/A GREATER DES MOINES COMMUNITY FDN ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds Sioux Falls Thrive Inc ↗
- Who funds ALEXANDRIA TECHNICAL & COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIFESCAPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Sioux Empire Triage Center ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds LET'S SKATE ↗
- Who funds FEEDING SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS HOUSE OF SIOUX FALLS ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BUTTERFLY HOUSE & AQUARIUM INC ↗
- Who funds SIOUX FALLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds Friends of South Dakota Public Broadcasting ↗
- Who funds EARLY FORD V-8 FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LEVITT SHELL SIOUX FALLS ↗
- Who funds DORDT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds STARTUP SIOUX FALLS ↗
- Who funds Community Indoor Tennis Center dba Huether Family Match Pointe ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: South Dakota Community Foundation · Sanford Group Return · Avera Health · Sheldon F Reese Foundation · The Mike Cindy and Kylie Huether Family Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · Sioux Empire United Way Inc · Larson Foundation · The Robert and Rita Elmen Foundation · Levo Cares Foundation · Valley Queen Charitable Foundation · Tenfold Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.