· Public charity
Sanford Group Return
Sanford health is committed to the healthcare needs of communities throughout the upper midwest.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 166 grants below total $25,885,904 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $47,489,473 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $21,603,569 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k25 grants · $175k
- $10k–50k91 grants · $1.9M
- $50k–250k34 grants · $3.5M
- $250k+16 grants · $20M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA (USD) | $3,604,552 |
| CONCORDIA COLLEGE | $3,306,000 |
| NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY (NDSU) | $2,346,667 |
| AUGUSTANA | $2,166,750 |
| SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY (SDSU) FOUNDATION | $2,125,000 |
| STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA | $1,432,412 |
| SD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $1,250,000 |
| UND ALUMNI FOUNDATION | $1,036,571 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MARY | $647,249 |
| SOUTH DAKOTA PARTNERS IN EDUCATION | $616,922 |
| FARGO PARK DISTRICT | $445,288 |
| SIOUX FALLS SCHOOL DISTRICT 49-5 | $310,000 |
| SIOUX EMPIRE TRIAGE CENTER | $300,000 |
| SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $250,000 |
| FORWARD SIOUX FALLS | $250,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $3.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
358 repeat relationships — 139 still active in FY2024, 219 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AUAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION8× · 2017–2024 · $26M · revenue +79%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION8× · 2017–2024 · $19M · revenue +36%
- CCCONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION8× · 2017–2024 · $18M · revenue +1%
Funded once
- SHSANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $6.6M · revenue +385%
- DODEPT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS2× · 2023–2024 · $6.0M
- DVDURHAM VETERANS AFFAIRS HEALTHCARE SYSTEMone grant, 2021 · $5.0M
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Advancing healthy communities through a unified voice across the health care continuum.
The association works to promote member credit unions as being safe and sound institutions for insured deposits, responsible lending, and the best place for consumers to receive financial services.
To create and strengthen partnerships that cultivate a robust health workforce for rural and underserved communities in south dakota.
Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.
Representing the interest of retail businesses who sell retail products and services throughout the state of south dakota.
Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…
To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.
End hunger together.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of South Dakota & Montana and the most unlike its peers is Secured My School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 25. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
428 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 428 of the 585 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONCORDIA COLLEGE CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SIOUX FALLS SPORTS AUTHORITY ↗
- Who funds Miami Children's Health System Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds North Dakota State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds SANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE SUMMIT LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds TEAM MAKERS CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Samaritan's Feet International ↗
- Who funds CURA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL HEALTH CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds THE EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN GOOD SAMARITAN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SANFORD HEALTH FOUNDATION NORTH ↗
- Who funds Northern State University Foundation ↗
- Who funds Bismarck State College Foundation ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY MANKATO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UND Alumni Association and Foundation ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS ↗
- Who funds SIOUX EMPIRE UNITED WAY INC ↗
- Who funds South Dakota Military Heritage Alliance ↗
- Who funds Northern Sun Intercollegiate Conference ↗
- Who funds University of Mary ↗
- Who funds Edith Sanford Breast Cancer Foundation ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ND ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Avera Health · Midcontinent Foundation · Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc · South Dakota Community Foundation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation · Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation Corporation · Dakota Medical Foundation · The Barry Foundation · Alex Stern Family Foundation · The Mike Cindy and Kylie Huether Family Foundation · Offutt Family Foundation · United Way of Cass-Clay
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sanford Group Return funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Variety Children's Hospital — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.