· Private foundation
Sheldon F Reese Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $54k
- $10k–50k20 grants · $292k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ST DYSMAS OF SOUTH DAKOTA | $25,000 |
| HOPE COALITION | $24,000 |
| CALL TO FREEDOM INC | $24,000 |
| AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIAION | $21,400 |
| SOUTH DAKOTA VOICES FOR PEACE | $20,000 |
| GREAT PLAINS ZOO AND AQUARIUM | $20,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE LEVITT SHELL SIOUX FALLS INC | $20,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER SIOUX FALLS | $15,000 |
| LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SD | $12,500 |
| THE COMMUNITY OUTREACH | $10,000 |
| CHILDRENS HOME SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| BLACK HILLS PLAYHOUSE | $10,000 |
| BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF SIOUX EMPIRE | $10,000 |
| DAKOTA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| FAMILY VISITATION CENTER | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $366k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +48% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
47 repeat relationships — 23 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $92k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AUAUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION6× · 2017–2025 · $97k · revenue +79%
- CTCALL TO FREEDOM4× · 2019–2025 · $79k · revenue +201%
- FCFAMILY CONNECTION9× · 2017–2025 · $73k · revenue +5%
Funded once
- TBTHE BANQUETone grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue -3%
- FOFRIENDS OF SD PUBLIC BROADCASTINGone grant, 2018 · $25k
- PFPROMISING FUTURES FUND (SIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION)one grant, 2024 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Southeastern north dakota community action agency (sendcaa) was formed in 1965 to provide a range of services and activities in a six county area designed to alleviate poverty and give low-income people the opportunity to improve their…
Downtown Sioux Falls boldly leads the downtown community by championing diverse experiences, economic growth, and a healthy environment.
Advancing healthy communities through a unified voice across the health care continuum.
To assist seniors in maintaining optimal health, independence, and socialization, deferring admission to long term care facilities and improving their quality of life.
Promote economic development in the mitchell, sd area
Economic development in the watertown, south dakota area.
Midwest dairy works with others to give consumers an excellent dairy experience increasing sales, fostering innovation, and inspiring consumer confidence of dairy products and practices.
Providing services to those affected by domestic violence and sexual assault and offering education, advocacy, and awareness to those in lawrence, harding, and butte counties in south dakota.
Representing the interest of retail businesses who sell retail products and services throughout the state of south dakota.
The association works to promote member credit unions as being safe and sound institutions for insured deposits, responsible lending, and the best place for consumers to receive financial services.
To serve the rural electric cooperatives in south dakota, to promote the effective development of rural electrification in south dakota on a cooperative, non-profit basis.
Madison regional health system serves as a community health focal point through the provision of compassionate, quality, and innovative care.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lutheran Social Services of South Dakota and the most unlike its peers is Orthopedic Institute Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
59 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 59 of the 91 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AUGUSTANA UNIVERSITY ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds FAMILY VISITATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds CALL TO FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CONNECTION ↗
- Who funds YOUTH & FAMILY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds THE BLACK HILLS PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA VOICES FOR PEACE ↗
- Who funds SIOUX FALLS PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REACH LITERACY ↗
- Who funds SCULPTUREWALK INC ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF GREATER SIOUX FALLS ↗
- Who funds CHEYENNE RIVER YOUTH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds DAKOTABILITIES INC ↗
- Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE OF THE DAKOTAS ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF LEVITT SHELL SIOUX FALLS ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE SIOUX EMPIRE ↗
- Who funds THE GLORY HOUSE OF SIOUX FALLS ↗
- Who funds HARMONY SOUTH DAKOTA INC ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON PAVILION MANAGEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTH DAKOTA INC ↗
- Who funds MITCHELL PREHISTORIC INDIAN VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds THE BANQUET ↗
- Who funds SIOUX FALLS HOPE COALITION ↗
- Who funds SOUTH DAKOTA SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA ↗
- Who funds THE LOST AND FOUND ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS - DAKOTA HORIZONS ↗
- Who funds HOPE COALITION ↗
- Who funds CRAZY HORSE MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLACK HILLS COMMUNITY THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds HELPLINE CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc · South Dakota Community Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · Avera Health · The Mike Cindy and Kylie Huether Family Foundation · Larson Foundation · Sanford Group Return · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Sioux Empire United Way Inc · Levo Cares Foundation · The Robert and Rita Elmen Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sheldon F Reese Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Sheldon F Reese Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Sheldon F Reese Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.