· Private foundation
Tenfold Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k21 grants · $52k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $73k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Embrace | $26,550 |
| Mission Haiti | $20,500 |
| Central Church | $15,500 |
| SF Public Schools Education Fund | $10,000 |
| Sioux Falls Christian School | $8,383 |
| Dordt University | $8,000 |
| World Shoe Fund | $5,000 |
| Heartland Christian Schools | $5,000 |
| Lifeline Children's Services | $5,000 |
| University of Sioux Falls | $3,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| Bethany Christian Services | $2,500 |
| Harrisburg Baseball Association | $2,500 |
| Fresh Produce LLC | $1,500 |
| Volunteers of America Dakotas | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $140k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
38 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $41k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SFSIOUX FALLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION7× · 2017–2025 · $200k · revenue +102%
- MHMISSION HAITI9× · 2017–2025 · $148k · revenue +26%
- CMCOLLISION MINISTRIES INC3× · 2019–2024 · $26k · revenue +144%
Funded once
- TSTHE SIOUX FALLS MINISTRY CENTERone grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue +10%
- EOEmily Ordaz and Jorge Chaviraone grant, 2022 · $70k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $13k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Siloam shares the love of christ by providing affordable, whole-person care to the uninsured & underserved that addresses the physical, emotional, spiritual, & social determinants of health.
To eliminate hunger in south dakota.
Our purpose is to evangelize boys and girls with the gospel of the lord jesus christ, disciple them in the word of god, and establish them in a bible believing church for christian living.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Guided by our values, Catholic Charities North Dakota serves people in need and advocates for the common good of all.
To provide youth ministry services to youth in the siouxland area.
To share christ's love as we serve the spiritual, physical, intellectual and emotional needs of people entrusted to our care and others whose lives we touch.
Corporate Care strategizes with workplace leadership to foster an environment of mutual care and service both inside and outside the workplace. Corporate Care provides short-term, on-site pastoral counseling to employees who wish to use…
Grand forks area youth for christ reaches young people everywhere, working together with the local church and other like-minded partners to raise up lifelong followers of jesus who lead by their godliness in lifestyle, devotion to prayer…
Ecumenical not-for-profit transitional living facility for the homeless in sioux falls, south dakota. purpose is to offer hospitality, fellowship and support to those who have nowhere to sleep.
To provide high-quality, comprehensive, community-sensitive health care utilizing christ-oriented principles. rooted in our faith-driven values, sichc serves as a pillar for accessible, comprehensive care of the whole person and a catalyst…
Through christian love and excellence, we are dedicated to providing a fulfilling lifestyle and promoting independence to those we serve.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Washed Clean Addiction & Recovery Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
43 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 43 of the 99 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SIOUX FALLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds MISSION HAITI ↗
- Who funds THE SIOUX FALLS MINISTRY CENTER ↗
- Who funds COLLISION MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds LIFELINE CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Emilys Hope ↗
- Who funds DORDT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SIOUX FALLS AREA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Washed Clean Addiction & Recovery Ministries ↗
- Who funds VETERANS COMMUNITY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOME SOCIETY OF SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
- Who funds WORLD SHOE FUND INC ↗
- Who funds CALL TO FREEDOM ↗
- Who funds COMPASSION CHILD CARE ↗
- Who funds THE COMPASS CENTER ↗
- Who funds FURNITURE MISSION OF SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SIOUX FALLS ↗
- Who funds SIOUX FALLS AREA HUMANE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN LIFE MINISTRIES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sioux Falls Area Community Foundation Inc · Midcontinent Foundation · South Dakota Community Foundation · Sanford Group Return · Avera Health · The Robert and Rita Elmen Foundation · The Mike Cindy and Kylie Huether Family Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Levo Cares Foundation · Larson Foundation · Sioux Empire United Way Inc · The Graco Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Tenfold Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.