· Private foundation
Sad Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PARK CITY MUSEUM | $7,000 |
| ARC OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| AMERICARES | $2,500 |
| EGYPTIAN THEATER | $2,500 |
| MACULAR DEGENERATION RESEARCH | $2,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BOARDERS | $2,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY | $2,000 |
| PARK CITY SENIOR CENTER | $2,000 |
| JORDYN'S JOY | $2,000 |
| MORRISTOWN BEARD SCHOOL | $2,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL TENNIS HALL OF FAME | $2,000 |
| TRUST FOR PUBLIC LANDS | $2,000 |
| POINT O WOODS COMMUNITY FUND | $2,000 |
| HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $46k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 66% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
283 repeat relationships — 119 still active in FY2025, 164 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TATHE ARC OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTYINC6× · 2020–2025 · $15k · revenue +24%
- MSMORRISTOWN-BEARD SCHOOL5× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +39%
- SCSUMMIT COMMUNITY GARDENS AND EATS6× · 2020–2025 · $9k · revenue +325%
Funded once
- MBMORRISTOWN- BEARD SCHOOL 58 PLEDGEone grant, 2020 · $5k
MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCone grant, 2023 · $2k · revenue +1%- POPOINT O'WOODS FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2024 · $2k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
To sustain, restore, and enhance the nation's fish, wildlife, plants, and habitats.
Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.
To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.
To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.
Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.
To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Petsmart Charities Inc and the most unlike its peers is Jake Owen Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
208 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 208 of the 448 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE ARC OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTYINC ↗
- Who funds PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PARK CITY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds MORRISTOWN-BEARD SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SUMMIT COMMUNITY GARDENS AND EATS ↗
- Who funds Community Wireless of Park City ↗
- Who funds Summit Land Conservancy ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN CENTER OF PARK CITY ↗
- Who funds OLD VERO ICE AGE SITES COMMITTEE INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds BERGEN FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS MANOR OF VERO BEACHINC ↗
- Who funds PARK CITY FILM COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds People's Health Clicnic ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds OXFAM-AMERICA INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds RIVERSIDE THEATRE INC ↗
- Who funds PROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Senior Resource Association Inc ↗
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Indian River Community Foundation Inc · The John's Island Foundation Inc · Ssir Cares Inc · Park City Community Foundation · John's Island Community Service League Inc · Bernard a Egan Foundation Inc · Promontory Foundation · Olivia Delacruz Foundation Inc · Grand Harbor Community Outreach Program Inc · The Kahle Foundation Inc · Archie S Wingfield Jr Charitable Trust U/A/D 5/15/1995 · United Way of Indian River County Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Sad Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Redlands Christian Migrant Association Inc — 51% of income from government
- Christopher Reeve Foundation — 49% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Safespace Inc — 25% of income from government
- Bergen Family Center — 25% of income from government
- Guardians for New Futures Inc — 11% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc — 2% of income from government
- The National Federation of the Blind — 2% of income from government
- United Way of Indian River County Inc — 1% of income from government
- Archaeological Institute of America — 1% of income from government
- Indian River Land Trust Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wheaton College — 0% of income from government
- Friends After Diagnosis Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pequot Library Association — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- The Learning Alliance Inc — 0% of income from government
- Whole Family Health Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
- Morristown-Beard School — 0% of income from government
- South Florida Pbs Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.