· Private foundation
Ssir Cares Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GRAND COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $7,300 |
| PARK CITY EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $7,000 |
| HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION | $6,500 |
| HEARSEE | $6,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF UTAH | $6,000 |
| WASATCH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $5,500 |
| GOLFHER | $4,500 |
| BREAKTHROUGH T1D | $4,000 |
| SUMMIT LAND CONSERVANCY | $3,500 |
| NUZZLES & CO | $3,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,500 |
| KPCW | $3,500 |
| PARK CITY HISTORICAL SOCIETY & MUSEUM | $3,500 |
| UTAH OLYMPIC LEGACY FOUNDATION | $3,500 |
| PEOPLE'S HEALTH CLINIC | $3,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $137k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 20% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +49% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.
114 repeat relationships — 63 still active in FY2025, 51 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $31k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPark City Education Foundation9× · 2017–2025 · $134k · revenue +70%
- BWBALLET WEST5× · 2018–2024 · $59k · revenue +71%
- HCHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $53k · revenue +63%
Funded once
- TATEXAS ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS DISASTER RELIEF FUNDone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue -97%
- NSNEW STORY INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $7k · revenue +87%
- KGKEN GARFF FOR GOODgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue +124%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Stimulate local business establishment, growth, and development by facilitating business to business and business to community relationships throughout Utah County.
The Utah Sports Commission Foundation is a charitable organization governed by an all-volunteer board of trustees consisting of statewide sports, business, and community leaders, and was created to foster national and international sports…
Provide support to the University of Utah Growth Capital Partners Foundation in Charitable, Educational and Scientific purposes.
We are utah's partner in philanthropy, pioneering innovation and collaboration to invest in our community today for a brighter tomorrow.
To serve as a catalyst for quality job growth and increased capital investment in the state.
The mission of the Utah Safety Council is to save lives by promoting safety and health through education, services, and products.
Middle and high school MT bike team
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Utah Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bill White Holistic Land Management. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
124 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 124 of the 173 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Park City Education Foundation ↗
- Who funds PARK CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BALLET WEST ↗
- Who funds HUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WEILENMANN SCHOOL OF DISCOVERY ↗
- Who funds Summit Land Conservancy ↗
- Who funds Kimball Art Center ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds UTAH ATHLETIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Peace House Inc ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds Wasatch Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds UTAH OPEN LANDS CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Holy Cross Ministries of Utah ↗
- Who funds Community Wireless of Park City ↗
- Who funds People's Health Clicnic ↗
- Who funds OUR RESCUE ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN TRAILS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PARK CITY TOTS INC ↗
- Who funds Nuzzles & Co ↗
- Who funds EATS Park City ↗
- Who funds TEE IT UP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHRISTMAS BOX INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds TAYLOR HAGEN MEMORIAL INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF UTAH INC ↗
- Who funds Mountain Town Stages ↗
- Who funds PARK CITY READS ↗
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF SUMMIT & WASATCH COUNTIES UTAH INC ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAINLANDS COMMUNITY HOUSING ASSOCIAT ↗
- Who funds United States Ski Team Foundation ↗
- Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
- Who funds PAWS FOR LIFE ↗
- Who funds TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS DISASTER RELIEF FUND ↗
- Who funds UTAH VETERANS ALLIANCE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sorenson Legacy Foundation · The Community Foundation of Utah · George S and Dolores Dore Eccles Foundation · Park City Community Foundation · Lawrence & Janet Dee Foundation · Pacificorp Foundation Aka Pacific Power Foundation Aka Rocky Mountain Power Foundati · Ihc Health Services Inc · Larry H Miller and Gail Miller Family Foundation · Sad Foundation Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Kennecott Utah Copper Visitors Center Charitable Foundation · David Kelby Johnson Memorial Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Ssir Cares Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.