· Private foundation
Olivia Delacruz Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k22 grants · $97k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $90k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WHOLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER | $20,000 |
| INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST | $10,000 |
| COASTAL CONNECTIONS INC | $10,000 |
| INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| THE LEARNING ALLIANCE | $10,000 |
| HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER INC | $10,000 |
| MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN | $10,000 |
| THE GRC RENEWED FOOD PANTRY | $10,000 |
| VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION | $6,000 |
| GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER | $5,000 |
| MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| OCEAN RESEARCH & CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA | $5,000 |
| REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $154k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +74% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.
43 repeat relationships — 24 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ELENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC9× · 2017–2025 · $72k · revenue +101%
- MBMCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC9× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +36%
- UAUNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC9× · 2017–2025 · $65k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA ARTS AND SCIENCES FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $30k
- AFAdventHealth Foundation Incone grant, 2024 · $15k · revenue 0%
- DDRLTone grant, 2023 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Partnering with parents, providers and communities to ensure quality early learning experiences through programmatic and financial support.
The indian river county chamber of commerce, inc. is a county-wide organization representing the business community by providing services, benefits, and leadership for positive economic growth and change.
The mission of the marine resources council (mrc) is to maintain and enhance the quality of marine systems for the economic, recreational, aesthetic, and environmental use for the people of florida
To identify solutions that will protect and enhance the lives of indian river county children, individuals, families, and seniors.
Florida community health centers, inc. (fchc) is a federally qualified health center serving medically needy populations in south florida, with an emphasis on serving rural and farm worker communities.
The institute for child and family health is committed to empowering the children, youth and families of miami-dade county, florida by providing services that enhance their emotional, physical and educational well-being.
Icic drives inclusive economic prosperity in under-resourced communities through innovative research and programs to create jobs, income, and wealth for local residents.
To preserve america's everglades and florida bay as natural resources.
UF Health's mission is to promote health through outstanding and high-quality patient care, innovative and rigorous education in the health professions and biomedical sciences, and high-impact research across the spectrum of basic,…
To champion a collaborative campaign to permanently connect, protect and restore the Florida Wildlife Corridor, a statewide network of lands and waters that supports wildlife and people. We combine conservation science with compelling…
Our mission is to encourage, honor and support the human-animal bond in the suncoast region of florida. our vision is to celebrate a community whose pets are safe and loved. suncoast humane society provides sheltering, prevention and…
Our mission is to provide exceptional dialysis care and services to individuals with end-stage kidney disease throughout central florida. we are dedicated to expanding access to treatment and ensuring all those in need receive quality…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Arc of Indian River Countyinc and the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 11. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 30% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 20% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL LEARNING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MCKEE BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED AGAINST POVERTY INC ↗
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Coastal Connections Inc ↗
- Who funds SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds THE LEARNING ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds WHOLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GIFFORD YOUTH ACHIEVEMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds OCEAN RESEARCH & CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTYINC ↗
- Who funds TREASURE COAST FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH GUIDANCE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Senior Resource Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MURPHY-HARPST CHILDREN'S CENTERS INC ↗
- Who funds ELKIN VALLEY TRAILS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds HELPING ANIMALS LIVE & OVERCOME IN ↗
- Who funds AdventHealth Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds REDLANDS CHRISTIAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds DOGS FOR LIFE INC ↗
- Who funds INDIAN RIVER VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE INC ↗
- Who funds OPERATION HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds Indian River County Habitat for Humanity Inc ↗
- Who funds THE HOPE FOR FAMILIES CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds FLOAT HOPE OF INDIAN RIVER COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds BLUE AND GOLD ALUMNI SCHOLARSHIP ↗
- Who funds Atlanta Speech School Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Indian River Community Foundation Inc · John's Island Community Service League Inc · The John's Island Foundation Inc · United Way of Indian River County Inc · Bernard a Egan Foundation Inc · Grand Harbor Community Outreach Program Inc · Sad Foundation Inc · Quail Valley Charities Inc · Archie S Wingfield Jr Charitable Trust U/A/D 5/15/1995 · Minotty Family Foundation · Impact 100 of Indian River County · Jake Owen Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Olivia Delacruz Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Economic Opportunities Council of I — 82% of income from government
- Redlands Christian Migrant Association Inc — 51% of income from government
- Safespace Inc — 25% of income from government
- Treasure Coast Food Bank Inc — 2% of income from government
- Indian River Land Trust Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Learning Alliance Inc — 0% of income from government
- Whole Family Health Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.