Loading…
Loading…
California · Nonprofit
Last Chance for Animals (California) is funded by 105 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $4,110,593 in grants to it, the largest being SAM SIMON CHARITABLE GIVING FOUNDATION INC ($1,150,000). 62 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
Last Chance for Animals's revenue fell 30% between 2017 and 2024.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,477 animals nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
76% of Last Chance for Animals’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (74% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$10k from 3 funders in 2025, up from $87k and 19 in 2017.
11 of 105 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 14% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of Last Chance for Animals’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 105 funders by total. Association, not causation.
Last Chance for Animals leans on a few funders — its largest provides 28% of grant income and the top three 61%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 29% · 2018 33% · 2019 57% · 2020 56% · 2021 47% · 2022 41% · 2023 40% · 2024 14% · 2025 68% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
35% of Last Chance for Animals's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 59% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
Last Chance for Animals is locally rooted: 66% of its grant income comes from California funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 105 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
87% of spending goes to programs.
83%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Operates in 39 states
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 105funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing