Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

Ross Stores Foundation

Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4.2M
Granted FY2026still arriving
140
Grants FY2026still arriving
33
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2026.

Youth Development$9.9MEducation$4.4MPublic Safety & Disaster$1.9MPhilanthropy$1.4MHuman Services$557kFood & Nutrition$556kInternational$468kCivil Rights$452kOther$0
02FY2026 · 140 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2026

  • Under $10k70 grants · $108k
  • $10k–50k63 grants · $1.6M
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $574k
  • $250k+2 grants · $2.0M
$10,000
Median grant
33
States reached
$10M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA$1,603,333
FIRST BOOK$366,700
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF THE PENINSULA$210,000
AMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC$153,558
GOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$100,000
EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE$60,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY$50,000
ALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER$30,000
HEART OF LOS ANGELES INC$30,000
DEV MISSION$30,000
ENLIGHTENED MENTOR CORPORATION$30,000
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY$30,000
HACK THE HOOD$30,000
SCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCE TEAM$30,000
OAKLAND CAREER TRAINING DEPOT CORP$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–26, $2.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WINGS FOR KIDS: $20k → 12%OURBRIDGE FOR KIDS: $30k → 10%YMCA OF GRAYS HARBOR: $6k → 18%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $30k → 9%WINGS FOR KIDS: $20k → 12%YMCA OF SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON: $5k → 13%YMCA OF GRAYS HARBOR: $5k → 18%MY NEW RED SHOES: $5k → 7%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $30k → 10%WINGS FOR KIDS: $10k → 12%OURBRIDGE INC: $20k → 10%YMCA OF GRAYS HARBOR: $5k → 18%YMCA OF GRAYS HARBOR: $5k → 18%THE CIRCUIT EPA: $20k → 8%YMCA OF GRAYS HARBOR: $4k → 18%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $800k → 14%PARA LOS NINOS: $30k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $400k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $400k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $200k → 14%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $100k → 14%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $30k → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $20k → 14%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $30k → 10%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $30k → 10%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $30k → 10%LARKIN STREET YOUTH SERVICES: $20k → 10%ALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER: $30k → 14%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $30k → 10%HILLSIDES: $30k → 14%HILLSIDES: $30k → 14%URBAN ANGELS SF: $30k → 10%YOUNG EISNER SCHOLARS: $30k → 14%UNIVERSITY YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION BERKELEY CALIFORNIA: $20k → 10%HIVELY: $30k → 10%YOUNG EISNER SCHOLARS: $30k → 14%YOUNG EISNER SCHOLARS: $30k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $30k → 14%BRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC: $30k → 14%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $30k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $30k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $30k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $30k → 10%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $20k → 10%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $10k → 10%FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES: $10k → 10%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $20k → 10%LIGHTHOUSE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NH
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16M · 143 repeat orgs$2.9M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.

143 repeat relationships — 83 still active in FY2026, 60 since wound down; 54 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

143
304

Total granted

$16M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
+7%

Still filing today

72%
61%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2026, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $643k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25’26
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25’26
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentArts & CultureHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA
    6× · 2021–2026 · $6.6M · revenue +5%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    6× · 2021–2026 · $1.9M · revenue +27%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA
    6× · 2021–2026 · $395k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2025 · $350k · revenue 0%
  • DIRECT RELIEF
    one grant, 2021 · $250k · revenue +24%
  • NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC
    one grant, 2021 · $175k · revenue -61%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Stem Advantage

Talent is equally distributed, but opportunity is not. STEM Advantage mentors, prepares, and inspires first-generation, low-income, and underserved college students for careers in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). We level…

Youth Development
2
California School-Age Consortium Inc

The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…

—
3
Institute for Applied Tinkering

Institute for Applied Tinkering IAT develops, practices and shares educational methods that challenge and support all children to engage deeply in their learning via real interests and real tools.

Youth Development
4
Berkeley Community Scholars Dba Berkeley Community Fund

Berkeley Community Scholars empowers Berkeley youth who face racial, economic, and other barriers to achieving their college dreams by providing a unique experience of scholarships, advising, mentoring, and a community of support.

Philanthropy
5
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
6
Equal Opportunity Schools

Equal opportunity schools' mission is to strengthen educator and system leader capacity to break down barriers to increase access, belonging, and success in rigorous college and career-prep secondary school courses for students of color…

Education
7
Cincinnati Youth Collaborative

Cincinnati Youth Collaborative ("CYC") empowers young people to overcome barriers and excel in education, career, and life.

Education
8
Friends of the Children - San Francisco Bay Area

Impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what.

Education
9
Youthbuild Global Inc

With love and respect, we partner with opportunity youth to build the skillsets and mindsets that lead to lifelong learning, livelihood, and leadership. youthbuild strives to create a world where all young people are seen for their…

Employment
10
Springboard Collaborative

Springboard collaborative combines targeted student instruction with parent training in an incentivized system that closes the literacy gap, by transferring the summer from a barrier into a springboard for financially disadvantaged…

Human Services
11
Junior Achievement of Sacramento Inc

Provide in school programs that educate and inspire young people to value free enterprise, understand business, economics and improve the quality of their lives.

International
12
Community Youth Center of San Francisco

Our mission is to encourage a diverse population of high-need young people to explore their full potential through academic, career, family, and community life. Every year, CYC impacts over 8,000 San Francisco youth and their families,…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Read and Feed and the most unlike its peers is Bbp Gem Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyElementary Literacy TutoringYouth Development CentersPolicy Research and AdvocacyEnvironmental Conservation …Christian Youth CampsLgbtq+ Community SupportCancer Support ServicesImmigrant Worker SupportCommunity FoundationsSchool Parent OrganizationsFaith-Based Social ServicesJewish Community Organizati…Public Library OperationsLocal Food System Organizat…Community Food PantriesChristian Missionary Organi…Developmental Disabilities …Ymca Youth DevelopmentAffordable Housing Developm…Health Access Advocacy and …Community College Foundatio…Youth Development ServicesSchool District FoundationsLocal History MuseumsDomestic Violence ServicesYouth Mentoring ProgramsIndependent K-12 SchoolsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Community Arts CentersYouth Sports ProgramsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Community FoundationsFood Banks and Pantries
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%3%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%18%10–20yr16%27%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%18%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%1%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%12%10–20yr16%57%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%21%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%7/379
the rest of the field
13%
240,389/1,819,186

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

345 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 345 of the 510 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
90
Early backer (in before they grew)
334/345
Grantees still filing
205/345
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $6,619,166 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICABOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $394,960 · Youth Development+18 more — $924,100 · Youth Development+18 moreFIRST BOOK — $1,984,150 · EducationFIRST BOOKAIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL — $120,000 · EducationSCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC (SMART) — $120,000 · Education+34 more — $1,162,044 · Education+34 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,920,000 · Human ServicesAmerican Nationa…BEYOND EMANCIPATION — $120,000 · Human Services+28 more — $866,037 · Human Services+28 moreTHE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC — $261,525 · OtherTHE EDUCATIONAL ALLI…LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $250,000 · OtherLOS ANGELES REGIONAL…ALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $150,000 · OtherBABY BUGGY AKA GOOD FOUNDATION — $145,000 · OtherA PLACE CALLED HOME — $140,300 · OtherNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $175,000 · OtherNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $175,000 · OtherCITY HARVEST INC — $150,000 · Other+91 more — $2,352,208 · Other+91 moreAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $781,006 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY INC — $350,000 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE — $120,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF THE TEXAS HILL COUNTRY INC — $50,000 · PhilanthropyKRISTI YAMAGUCHI'S ALWAYS DREAM — $50,000 · PhilanthropyGOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $600,000 · Recreation & SportsPORTLAND TENNIS & EDUCATION — $65,000 · Recreation & Sports+2 more — $40,000 · Recreation & SportsDIRECT RELIEF — $250,000 · InternationalJunior Achievement of Northern California — $70,300 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH CENTRAL PA — $70,000 · InternationalGOOD360 — $15,000 · International
Youth Development$7,938,226Education$3,386,194Human Services$2,906,037Other$3,799,033Philanthropy$1,401,006Recreation & Sports$705,000International$405,300

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $6,619,166 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetFIRST BOOK — $1,984,150 over 6y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $1,920,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $781,006 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $600,000 over 4y, 8.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE PENINSULA — $394,960 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED WAY INC — $350,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetTHE EDUCATIONAL ALLIANCE INC — $261,525 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $250,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNAACP LEGAL DEFENSE & EDUC FUND INC — $175,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNAACP EMPOWERMENT PROGRAMS INC — $175,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetScientific Adventures dba Scientific Adventures for Girls — $150,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME — $140,300 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetAIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL — $120,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetBEYOND EMANCIPATION — $120,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetSCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC (SMART) — $120,000 over 4y, 1.3% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR STUDENTS RISING ABOVE — $120,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetLOS ANGELES URBAN FOUDATION — $110,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA — $110,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetNETWORK FOR TEACHING ENTREPRENEURSHIP — $93,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetJUMPSTART FOR YOUNG CHILDREN INC — $90,400 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetSUMMER PROGRAM FOR YOUTH — $90,400 over 3y, 12% of budgetPS Science — $90,000 over 3y, 3.5% of budgetTHE BELL FOUNDATION INC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHINK TOGETHER — $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCASA YOUTH SHELTER — $90,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetNEW DOOR VENTURES FKA GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY INC — $90,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY — $90,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetYoung Eisner Scholars — $90,000 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetLarkin Street Youth Services — $80,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLAVENDER YOUTH RECREATION & INFORMATION CENTER INC LYRIC — $80,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetENTERPRISE FOR YOUTH — $80,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetBayview-Hunters Point Center for Arts and Technology DBA BAYCAT — $80,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetREADING PARTNERS — $80,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetJunior Achievement of Northern California — $70,300 over 5y, 0.7% of budget826 Valencia — $70,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTH CENTRAL PA — $70,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetPORTLAND TENNIS & EDUCATION — $65,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetMission Bit — $60,800 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FRIENDS SCHOOL — $60,400 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetELEVATE TUTORING INC — $60,400 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetHILLSIDES — $60,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetREAD TO A CHILD INC — $60,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetLOS ANGELES LGBT CENTER — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBRAILLE INSTITUTE OF AMERICA INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Golden State Communit…The Morris Stulsaft F…Quest FoundationEast Bay Community Fo…Bothin FoundationThe Barrios TrustThe San Francisco Fou…Crankstart FoundationBernard E & Alba Witk…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Tipping Point Communi…Atkinson Foundation
Golden State Community FoundationCA48.4× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Golden State Community Foundation · The Morris Stulsaft Foundation · Quest Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · Bothin Foundation · The Barrios Trust · The San Francisco Foundation · Crankstart Foundation · Bernard E & Alba Witkin Charitable Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Tipping Point Community · Atkinson Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Ross Stores Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • Integral Youth Services — 29% of income from government
  • Helping Advance and Nurture the Development of Youth Inc (Handy Inc) — 21% of income from government
  • City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
  • The Arc of Cape May County Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Uaspire Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
90report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Ross Stores Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Ross Stores Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 510 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines