· Private foundation
The Barrios Trust
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $39k
- $10k–50k37 grants · $378k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Piedmont East Bay Childrens Choir | $15,000 |
| Oakland Museum of California | $12,500 |
| Camps in Common | $10,000 |
| Martin Luther King Jr Freedom Cente | $10,000 |
| Earth Island Institute | $10,000 |
| Oakland Soccer Club | $10,000 |
| Running for Better Oakland | $10,000 |
| Things That Creep | $10,000 |
| College Prep Partners Program | $10,000 |
| Vida Verde Nature Education | $10,000 |
| Hack the Hood | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| BORP | $10,000 |
| Oakland Interfaith Gospel Choir | $10,000 |
| Aim High | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $85k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +34% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
64 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 37 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $138k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Earth Island Institute Inc4× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +271%- OLOakland Leaf Foundation5× · 2017–2023 · $40k · revenue +79%
- DADestiny Arts Center5× · 2018–2022 · $38k · revenue +109%
Funded once
- UOUniversity of California Cal Perforone grant, 2023 · $10k
- CACOMMUNITY ALLIANCE FOR LEARNING DBA WRITERCOACH CONNECTIONone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -17%
- CFCenter for Popular Researchone grant, 2017 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of Oakland Kids First is to increase youth voice, leadership and power to create engaging and equitable public schools where all students learn and lead.
To advance arts justice by ensuring that all students in under-resourced oakland public schools receive a comprehensive arts education in order to improve learning and promote achievement.
Through coaching and group facilitation, leaders of color heal from racism, develop skills to identify & interrupt racism in personal leadership, organizational practices & policies, and produce antiracist solutions in partnership with…
The California School-Age Consortium (CalSAC) builds professional networks that provide training, leadership development and advocacy to ensure that all young people have access to high quality out-of-school time programs and to create a…
Institute for Applied Tinkering IAT develops, practices and shares educational methods that challenge and support all children to engage deeply in their learning via real interests and real tools.
BRIDGEGOOD increases opportunity and digital literacy for under-resourced students with a focus on Black Indigenous and Women People of Color. We prepare first-generation college students for careers in UX UI and Visual Design while…
To prepare its students for admission to and success in college and career,and to become happy and productive members of society.
Youth in Arts builds visual and performing arts skills through innovative and in-depth programs that foster confidence, compassion and resilience in students of all abilities. We develop capacity among educators and teaching artists,…
A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…
Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.
The Bay Area Creative Foundation celebrates, cultivates, and inspires creativity in youth and young adults. We believe in fostering a society that embodies creative spirit, art, and innovation.
Bay area creative supports positive change through creative and expressive arts that uphold cultures, provide therapeutic benefits, and to enhance communication skills primarily in underrepresented communities. We are driven by our…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Oakland Public Education Fund and the most unlike its peers is Aim High. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
90 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 90 of the 114 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds Earth Island Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds Oakland Leaf Foundation ↗
- Who funds CAMP PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds THE PEOPLES CONSERVATORY ↗
- Who funds Destiny Arts Center ↗
- Who funds WATERSIDE WORKSHOPS ↗
- Who funds OAKLAND SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds THE CRUCIBLE ↗
- Who funds BEYOND EMANCIPATION ↗
- Who funds Community Resources for Science ↗
- Who funds Piedmont Choirs dba Piedmont East Bay Childrens Choir ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN RISING INC ↗
- Who funds Mindful Life Project ↗
- Who funds Family Paths Inc ↗
- Who funds CANTARE CON VIVO ↗
- Who funds Chapter 510 Ink ↗
- Who funds HEALTH INITIATIVES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds OAKLAND MUSEUM OF CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds Oakland Childrens Fairyland Inc ↗
- Who funds EAST BAY CHILDRENS LAW OFFICES INC ↗
- Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds Lincoln ↗
- Who funds BAY AREA GIRLS ROCK CAMP ↗
- Who funds East Bay Agency for Children ↗
- Who funds AIM HIGH ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY INITIATIVES ↗
- Who funds YOUTH ALIVE ↗
- Who funds FRESH LIFELINES FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds ASPIRE EDUCATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds BAY AREA SCORES ↗
- Who funds Battle Tested Kids INC ↗
- Who funds THE MENTORING CENTER ↗
- Who funds Prescott Circus Theatre ↗
- Who funds Alliance for Global Justice Corp ↗
- Who funds East Oakland Youth Development Center ↗
- Who funds Camps in Common ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · The Morris Stulsaft Foundation · Quest Foundation · Bernard E & Alba Witkin Charitable Foundation · Lowell Berry Foundation · T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Private Family Foundation · The Joseph and Vera Long Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Oakland Public Education Fund · Silicon Valley Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Barrios Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.