Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Phillies Charities Inc

Established exclusively for charitable purposes particularly raising contributions and payment of contributions to organizations described as exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code.

$4.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
73
Grants FY2024still arriving
14
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.

Health$2.7MHuman Services$1.7MHousing & Shelter$1.6MYouth Development$835kEducation$616kFood & Nutrition$562kCommunity Improvement$515kPhilanthropy$472kOther$0
02FY2024 · 73 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 73 grants below total $4,040,927 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,163,810 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $122,883 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k6 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k60 grants · $1.9M
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $597k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.5M
$40,000
Median grant
14
States reached
$891k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PROJECT HOME$1,000,000
CLEARWATER AMPLIFY$500,000
ALS UNITED MID ATLANTIC$249,927
SCHWARBER FAMILY FOUNDATION$160,000
PHILABUNDANCE$87,278
FRESH ARTISTS$50,000
V FOUNDATION FOR CANCER RESEARCH$50,000
BLACK WOMEN IN SPORT FOUNDATION$40,000
VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE$40,000
LT DENNIS W ZILINSKI II$40,000
INTERCOMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK$40,000
FOR PETE'S SAKE CANCER RESPITE$40,000
ANGELS IN MOTION$40,000
MOTHERS' HOME INC$40,000
BELIEVE AND ACHIEVE FOUNDATION$40,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $2.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 75% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LUTHERAN COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $40k → 10%CRADLES TO CRAYONS INC: $50k → 8%Shanthi Project: $15k → 11%DUSTINS ADVENTURELAND: $35k → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS WIRE (MAUI WILDFIRE RELIEF): $25k → 14%High Socks for Hope: $105k → 17%Twilight Wish: $15k → 6%Equil-Librium INC: $15k → 11%American Red Cross SEPA Chapter: $20k → 14%HELP US GATHER: $40k → 12%HIGH SOCKS FOR HOPE: $46k → 17%VALLEY YOUTH HOUSE: $40k → 11%Valley Youth House: $15k → 11%SIGHTS FOR HOPE: $35k → 11%DUNEDIN CARES INC: $35k → 12%TOMS RIVER FIELD OF DREAMS: $25k → 11%TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $31k → 22%MOTHERS' HOME INC: $40k → 10%SURREY SERVICES FOR SENIORS INC: $20k → 6%PETTAWAY PURSUIT FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%FRANKIE'S WORLD: $35k → 22%CANINE PARTNERS FOR LIFE: $25k → 6%DAVIDS DRIVE 831 INC: $20k → 6%GRANDS STEPPING UP: $20k → 10%Drueding Center: $50k → 22%BELIEVE AND ACHIEVE FOUNDATION: $40k → 6%Believe and Achieve Foundation: $15k → 6%RYAN'S CASE FOR SMILES: $40k → 6%ONE HOUSE AT A TIME: $25k → 7%Ryan S Case for Smiles: $15k → 6%FAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICE: $35k → 10%WEST CHESTER AREA SENIOR CENTER: $35k → 6%FOR INFINITY AND BEYOND FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%Garden of Health Inc: $15k → 7%FATHER BILL ATKINSON CENTER: $35k → 10%PROJECT HOME: $1.0M → 22%B INSPIRED PHILADELPHIA: $25k → 22%ACLAMO: $25k → 7%CASA OF PHILADELPHIA COUNTY: $25k → 22%FAMILIES BEHIND THE BADGE: $25k → 7%GREATER PHILADELPHIA YMCA: $20k → 7%PAWS AND AFFECTION INC: $35k → 7%FOREVER CAPTAIN POODAMAN THE AHMAD BUTLER FOUNDATION: $20k → 22%INTERCOMMUNITY ACTION NETWORK: $40k → 22%GARCES FOUNDATION: $35k → 22%TURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN: $30k → 22%SUNDAY BREAKFAST RESCUE MISSION: $25k → 22%WOMEN IN TRANSITION: $25k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OR
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
NE
KY
MD
DE
AZ
NC
DC
LA
AL
GA
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 100% of Phillies Charities Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 76% of the giving stays in PA; read by stated purpose it is 0% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

Phillies Charities Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

35%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.8M · 53 repeat orgs$7.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

53 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 43 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
191

Total granted

$3.8M
$4.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+17%

Still filing today

94%
85%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 27% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.9M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Philabundance
    4× · 2019–2024 · $177k · revenue +83%
  • HS
    High Socks for Hope Inc
    2× · 2019–2020 · $151k · revenue +80%
  • BP
    BETHESDA PROJECT
    6× · 2019–2024 · $145k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • MA
    MARIAN ANDERSON HISTORICAL SOCIETYgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $70k · revenue +62%
  • DC
    DRUEDING CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue -10%
  • CY
    CAST YOUR CARES INC
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +16% · 44% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
2
Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services
3
Ch Pennsylvania Under - 21

Our mission is to serve children and youth facing homelessness and human trafficking, and to protect and safeguard all children. we provide trauma-informed interventions for youth who are in need.covenant house pennsylvania (chpa) remains…

Housing & Shelter
4
Parent Education and Advocacy Leadership Center

The mission of the peal center is to educate and empower families to ensure that children, youth and young adults with disabilities and special health care needs lead rich, active lives as full members of their schools and communities.

Education
5
Pennsylvania Organization for Women in Early Recovery

See schedule o.power's mission is to help women reclaim their lives from addiction and related emotional health issues and improve the well-being of future generations. we provide a range of gender-responsive, trauma-informed drug and…

Health
6
Philhaven

Philhaven promotes hope, healing and wholeness through the provision of behavioral resources.

Health
7
Accessmatters

Accessmatters' mission is to protect, expand, and enhance access to sexual and reproductive health care and information for all people. accessmatters fulfills its mission by providing services and information directly to people, by…

Health
8
Women's Law Project

Women's law project creates a more just and equitable society by advancing the rights and status of all women throughout their lives. to this end, we engage in high-impact litigation, advocacy, and education. the core values of women's law…

Civil Rights
9
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
10
Public Health Management Corporation

Public health management corporation (phmc) is a nonprofit public health institute that creates and sustains healthier communities. phmc uses best practices to improve community health through direct service, partnership, innovation,…

Health
11
Elwyn of Pennsylvania and Delaware

Elwyn makes life better for people with developmental and behavioral health challenges.

Human Services
12
The Children's Institute of Pittsburgh

To heal. to teach. to empower. to amaze.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Homeless Emergency Project Inc and the most unlike its peers is Alec Bohm Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr13%13%5–10yr19%30%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr15%20%35–55yr17%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%13%<5yr13%13%5–10yr19%22%10–20yr17%13%20–35yr15%25%35–55yr17%14%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 13% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%5/289
the rest of the field
9%
7,127/77,873

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

261 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 261 of the 289 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

19
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
57
Early backer (in before they grew)
253/261
Grantees still filing
172/261
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

PROJECT HOME — $1,000,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOMEHigh Socks for Hope Inc — $150,741 · Human ServicesHigh Socks for Hope Inc+38 more — $1,341,482 · Human Services+38 moreALS UNITED MID-ATLANTIC — $991,868 · HealthALS UNITED MID-ATLANTICTHE V FOUNDATION — $100,000 · HealthTHE NEMOURS FOUNDATION — $70,188 · Health+25 more — $890,903 · Health+25 moreBETHESDA PROJECT — $145,001 · OtherPhilabundance — $176,732 · Other+92 more — $3,054,310 · Other+92 morePolice Athletic League Of Philadelphia — $144,991 · Youth DevelopmentNEED IN DEED — $54,540 · Youth DevelopmentCAMELOT FOR CHILDREN — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentMINDS MATTER OF PHILADELPHIA INC — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentCLEARWATER FOR YOUTH INC — $40,000 · Youth DevelopmentESF DREAM CAMP FOUNDATION — $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentNEIGHBORHOOD BIKE WORKS — $35,000 · Youth DevelopmentSHANE VICTORINO FOUNDATION — $32,668 · Youth DevelopmentDREAMCHASERS UNITED NFP — $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentJUNGLE NON PROFIT INC — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOMMUNITIES THAT CARE OF GREATER DOWNINGTOWN — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentOPEN DOOR ABUSE AWARENESS PREVENTION — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS SPARK — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentSIMPLY POSITIVE KIDS — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentLUCY OUTREACH A NJ NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $25,000 · Youth Development+1 more — $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentAMPLIFY CLEARWATER CHAMBER FOUNDATION — $500,000 · Community ImprovementUrban Resources Development Corporation — $40,000 · Community ImprovementCEIBA INC — $20,000 · Community ImprovementSCHWARBER FAMILY FOUNDATION — $160,000 · PhilanthropyBruce Montgomery Foundation For the Arts — $40,000 · PhilanthropyIM ABLE FOUNDATION — $40,000 · PhilanthropyLT DENNIS W ZILINSKI II MEMORIAL FUND — $40,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GIVING TREE — $40,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BREATHING ROOM FOUNDATION INC — $35,000 · PhilanthropyKEVIN FROM HEAVEN FOUNDATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropySHERIFF FRANK REYNOLDS CHARITIES INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE TUG MCGRAW FOUNDATION — $20,000 · PhilanthropyPLAYERS PHILANTHROPY FUND INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyHEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA — $57,500 · EducationSWARTHMORE COLLEGE — $55,000 · EducationFOLDS OF HONOR EASTERN-PA-NJ-CHAPTER — $53,358 · EducationSTRAWBERRY MANSION LEARNING CENTER — $50,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $35,000 · EducationTemple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education — $33,588 · EducationMIKAYLAS VOICE — $25,000 · EducationMIGHTY WRITERS — $25,000 · EducationTEAM UP PHILLY — $20,000 · Education
Human Services$2,492,223Health$2,052,959Other$3,376,043Youth Development$622,199Community Improvement$560,000Philanthropy$440,000Education$354,446

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPROJECT HOME — $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetALS UNITED MID-ATLANTIC — $991,868 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetPhilabundance — $176,732 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSCHWARBER FAMILY FOUNDATION — $160,000 over 1y, 93% of budgetHigh Socks for Hope Inc — $150,741 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetBETHESDA PROJECT — $145,001 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetPolice Athletic League Of Philadelphia — $144,991 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetPennsylvania Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals — $102,453 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFRESH ARTISTS — $96,250 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetAMERICAN GOLD STAR MOTHERS INC — $73,748 over 3y, 13% of budgetTHE NEMOURS FOUNDATION — $70,188 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMARIAN ANDERSON HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $70,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetPHILADELPHIA ANIMAL WELFARE SOCIETY — $67,597 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $65,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetALS ASSOCIATION LOUISIANA-MISSISSIPPI CH — $65,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetAUTISM SPEAKS INC — $63,756 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTURNING POINTS FOR CHILDREN — $61,482 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPENNSYLVANIA COALITION AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $60,551 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCharity Navigator — $60,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetHEIGHTS PHILADELPHIA — $57,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetRYAN'S CASE FOR SMILES — $55,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetVALLEY YOUTH HOUSE COMMITTEE INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBELIEVE & ACHIEVE FOUNDATION — $55,000 over 2y, 28% of budgetHosts for Hospitals — $55,000 over 2y, 14% of budgetSWARTHMORE COLLEGE — $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEED IN DEED — $54,540 over 3y, 5.1% of budgetBRINGING HOPE HOME — $53,889 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR EASTERN-PA-NJ-CHAPTER — $53,358 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetRICHARD DAVID KANN MELANOMA TASK FORCE INC — $52,420 over 4y, 3.5% of budgetDRUEDING CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCAST YOUR CARES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetSTRAWBERRY MANSION LEARNING CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 68% of budgetPHOTOGRAPHY WITHOUT BORDERS INC — $46,250 over 2y, 10% of budgetTRANSPLANT HOUSE — $45,838 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMINDING YOUR MIND — $45,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMen Who Care of Germantown Inc — $40,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetWORTHWHILE WEAR INC — $40,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetBETTER DAYS AHEAD OUTREACH INC — $40,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetTHE RUBEN AMARO SR FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetSaint John's Hospice — $40,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetThe Helping Project Corp — $40,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetBruce Montgomery Foundation For the Arts — $40,000 over 1y, 37% of budgetPotter's House Mission Inc — $40,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetIM ABLE FOUNDATION — $40,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetCAMELOT FOR CHILDREN — $40,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetTREDYFFRIN & EASTTOWN CARE — $40,000 over 1y, 6.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Philadelphia Foun…W W Smith Charitable …Connelly FoundationHenry Dolfinger 2 Tru…The Gordon Charter Fo…United Way of Greater…Wsfs Cares FoundationThe Cigna Group Found…The William Penn Foun…The Barra Foundation …The Patricia Kind Fam…Union Benevolent Asso…
The Philadelphia FoundationPA104.9× affinity89 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Philadelphia Foundation · W W Smith Charitable Trust · Connelly Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · The Gordon Charter Foundation · United Way of Greater Philadelphia and Southern New Jersey · Wsfs Cares Foundation · The Cigna Group Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · The Barra Foundation Inc · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · Union Benevolent Association

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Phillies Charities Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 15%
  • Countryside Cares Inc — 80% of income from government
  • Alice Paul Institute Inc — 43% of income from government
  • Homeless Emergency Project Inc — 15% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
  • The Nemours Foundation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 289 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home