Skip to content

Pennsylvania · Nonprofit

MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS

MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 17 organizations whose IRS filings report $629,313 to it, the largest being DREXEL UNIVERSITY ($130,375). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$16M
Funders on record
17
Grants received
$629k
Net assets
$4.2M
12/17 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 1%
01What it does

What Mental Health Partnerships does

Mission

Mental Health Partnerships (mhp) is one the largest mental health associations in the united states. Continued on schedule o.operating approximately thirty-five (35) services, which provide an array of advocacy, direct support service, and training and education services in pennsylvania (pa) with direct services concentrated in southeast pa including in philadelphia, delaware, montgomery, chester and bucks counties; and advocacy state-wide and nationally. Mhp is at the forefront in the development of wellness self-management approaches for individuals in recovery from major mental health and co-occuring conditions and support for family members.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

On its FY2024 return the organization reported a significant change in how it conducts a program.

The agency closed its two delaware state recovery learning centers after the loss of the delaware state contract at the end of fy2024.

Its own explanation, from Schedule O of that return (Part III, line 3).

  1. Residential treatment: mhp offers safe, supportive transitional housing for individuals experiencing homelessness and living with mental health or co-occurring conditions. Through intensive case management, we connect people to housing, healthcare, and community resources - helping them move from crisis toward stability and independence. Our drop-in centers provide welcoming spaces where people can meet basic needs and begin to rebuild their lives. In addition to the program revenue reported above, the program is also supported by government grants and contracts.

    $6,446,086 spent$2,356,538 earned by the program
    51% of program spending
  2. Community and mobile services: our mobile peer teams show individuals and families that recovery is possible. Certified peer specialists use their lived experience to inspire hope, encourage independence, and walk alongside people on their journey.outreach teams: our outreach teams meet people where they are, establishing relationships with people experiencing homelessness in order to help connect them to safe housing and services to rebuild their lives. Outreach teams also provide people with essential needs, including food, water, clothing, hygiene items, and more.continued on schedule o.representative payee: mhp's representative payee program helps individuals manage their finances with dignity and accountability. By ensuring bills are paid and teaching budgeting skills, we give people the stability and confidence to focus on their recovery and independence.compeer: compeer fosters one-to-one friendships that reduce isolation, boost self-esteem, and help adults with mental health challenges feel part of a caring community.healthy minds chatline: the healthy minds chatline provides free, confidential, and immediate peer support for anyone seeking help with life's challenges.…

    $4,169,296 spent$2,824,560 earned by the program
    33% of program spending
  3. Training and education: the institute@mhp is a national leader in peer training, pioneering certified peer specialist certification and practicum programs. We equip individuals and organizations with the skills, tools, and knowledge to build trauma-informed, recovery-focused systems at the local, state, and federal level.continued on schedule o.the individual coalition action network (ican): ican equips people in recovery with the knowledge and skills to become powerful advocates. Through workshops and education, participants learn to engage in policy and legislative issues, ensuring that the voices of those with lived experience are heard in shaping mental health policy.in addition to the program revenue reported above, the program is also supported by government grants and contracts.

    $1,188,634 spent$730,907 earned by the program
    9% of program spending
  4. Advocacy: mhp's advocacy team ensures that people living with mental health conditions and their families are treated with dignity and respect. We support individuals navigating service challenges, protect their rights, and amplify their voices in decision-making processes.in addition to the program revenue reported above, the program is also supported by government grants and contracts.

    $513,940 spent$76,667 earned by the program
    4% of program spending
  5. Family and youth services:the training and education center (tec) provides a range of supportive services, training, and education to families and individuals with a loved one who has a mental health diagnosis. Tec also provides seminars, continuing education classes, and technical assistance for professionals in the mental health field. Parenting plus: is a series of twelve two-hour parenting sessions for parents with mental health diagnoses or mental health issues. Topics are presented in a trauma-informed environment by a highly trained, certified parenting educator.family peer support: mental health crisis court provides individualized and recovery-oriented support, information, and resources to family members, partners, and friends who attend mental health crisis court proceedings that involve their loved one. In addition, to the program revenue reported above, the program is also supported by government grants and contracts.

    $263,569 spent
    2% of program spending

The 5 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $12,581,525.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($20M) Expenses 100 ($19M) Net assets 100 ($1.8M)2018 Revenue 101 ($20M) Expenses 101 ($19M) Net assets 125 ($2.3M)2019 Revenue 100 ($19M) Expenses 101 ($19M) Net assets 131 ($2.4M)2020 Revenue 88 ($17M) Expenses 94 ($18M) Net assets 78 ($1.4M)2021 Revenue 82 ($16M) Expenses 82 ($16M) Net assets 109 ($2.0M)2022 Revenue 80 ($16M) Expenses 71 ($14M) Net assets 204 ($3.7M)2023 Revenue 74 ($14M) Expenses 75 ($14M) Net assets 218 ($3.9M)2024 Revenue 75 ($15M) Expenses 77 ($15M) Net assets 218 ($3.9M)2025 Revenue 80 ($16M) Expenses 79 ($15M) Net assets 231 ($4.2M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (80)Expenses (79)Net assets (231)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2022 to 2023, from $8.9M to $14M (+59%).

$5.7M
$5.1M
$6.4M
$7.5M
$7.8M
$8.9M
$14M
$15M
$16M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 67% · 2018 63% · 2019 66% · 2020 67% · 2021 66% · 2022 55% · 2023 61% · 2024 69% · 2025 59%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

59% of MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (7% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 4,743 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$394k
’17
$423k
’18
$133k
’19
−$795k
’20
$276k
’21
$2.0M
’22
$126k
’23
−$7k
’24
$380k
’25
1.8
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Jeannine L Lisitski

Chief executive officer

Board chair

Irene Hurford

Chair

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed212522171618171119
Joined·+5+3+3+2+3+4+2+10
No longer listed·16831582
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base narrowed from 6 funders to 3 funders, grant income fell $110k → $88k.

6 of 17 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 19% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 21% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

80% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS.

21%
largest funder
50%
top three
~8
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 42% · 2018 32% · 2019 32% · 2020 50% · 2021 99% · 2022 54% · 2023 77% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

18% of MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 71% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

89% of MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS's grant income comes from Pennsylvania funders.

NY
PA
VA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Pennsylvania out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $117k arriving through sponsors registered in 4 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS is better cushioned than half of the 2,843 health nonprofits its size.

Operating margin2% · below the median
Months of reserve1.8mo · above the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−3% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,843 health nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2025

Government funding MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $5.0M on record — $2.1M federal, $2.8M state.

Federal$2.1M
grants $2.1Mcontracts $8k
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top agencies
  • Department of Housing and Urban Development$2.1M
  • Department of Health and Human Services$8k
State$2.8M
22
23
24
25
Top programs
  • MEDICAL SERVICES$2.2M
  • HEALTH CARE SERVICES$511k
  • FED GRANT SUB RECIPIENT$100k
  • CLIENT ASSISTANCE$2k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Pennsylvania

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

83% of spending goes to programs.

Program 83%Management 17%Fundraising 1%

Governance

14
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

PA

Part of a family of 1 related entity

  • Mental Health Association in Southwestern New Jersey · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS?
MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 17 organizations whose IRS filings report $629,313 to it, the largest being DREXEL UNIVERSITY ($130,375). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS have?
IRS filings report 17 organizations giving $629,313 in grants to MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS?
DREXEL UNIVERSITY is the largest funder on record, with $130,375 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like MENTAL HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Mental Health Partnerships →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 17 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing