· Public charity
Mgm Resorts Foundation
The MGM RESORTS FOUNDATION brings the best of our employee volunteer and charitable efforts together with greater impact and greater choice.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 145 grants below total $3,730,083 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,657,256 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $927,173 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k22 grants · $160k
- $10k–50k96 grants · $1.5M
- $50k–250k27 grants · $2.1M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UCLA FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVA | $98,161 |
| HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA | $86,858 |
| SAFE NEST TEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR | $85,008 |
| NEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION | $82,857 |
| NEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOU | $82,362 |
| ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF LAS VEGAS | $80,746 |
| VMSN INC | $80,720 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEVADA | $80,230 |
| RAISE THE FUTURE | $80,052 |
| HOOKERS FOR JESUS | $80,008 |
| JUST ONE PROJECT | $80,005 |
| COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER | $80,000 |
| JEREMIAH PROGRAM | $80,000 |
| TEACH FOR AMERICA INC | $80,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $7.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
180 repeat relationships — 84 still active in FY2024, 96 since wound down; 57 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.0M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NPNEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH8× · 2017–2024 · $669k · revenue +145%
- TSTHREE SQUARE8× · 2017–2024 · $663k · revenue +9%
- SNSAFE NESTTEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR8× · 2017–2024 · $658k · revenue +231%
Funded once
- LVLAS VEGAS VICTIMS' FUNDone grant, 2018 · $4.0M
- U5UNDER 5000one grant, 2020 · $505k
- UFUMC FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2018 · $318k · revenue -10%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…
Provides person-centered and inclusive services to children and adults with and without disabilities that includes securing employment, connecting to necessary supportive services, accessing housing and participating fully as contributing…
Helping people move to a better life through hope-filled care, services, and advocacy; calling all those of goodwill to join us
Cultivating inclusive communities through relationships, innovation and high-quality services.
Compass family services helps homeless families and those at imminent risk to achieve housing stability, economic self-sufficiency, and well-being.
To empower neighborhood residents to build a vision of their community's future and to actively engage in solving local problems.
Valle del sol inspires positive change by investing in health and human services to strengthen families with tools and skills for self-sufficiency and by building the next generation of latino and diverse leaders.
The mission of the eddy house is to provide at-risk youth the opportunity to reach their full potential as healthy individuals through a continuum of programs and services in northern nevada.
Provide services in response to individual need
Lifeworks' mission is to partner with people with disabilities to drive change by increasing opportunity and access in the community.
Thrive dc works to prevent and end homelessness by providing vulnerable individuals with a comprehensive range of services to help stabilize their lives.
To strengthen youth and families while enhancing systems and communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Nevada and the most unlike its peers is Andre Agassi Foundation for Education. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 9. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 35% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 21% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
331 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 331 of the 381 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CONSUMER CREDIT COUNSELING SERVICE OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds NEVADA PARTNERSHIP FOR HOMELESS YOUTH ↗
- Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
- Who funds SAFE NESTTEMPORARY ASSISTANCE FOR ↗
- Who funds NEVADA CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds NEVADA BLIND CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds RAISE THE FUTURE ↗
- Who funds ST ROSE DOMINICAN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds TECH IMPACT ↗
- Who funds OLIVE CREST ↗
- Who funds CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES VETERANS INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds THE SHADE TREE INC ↗
- Who funds VMSN INC ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN NEVADA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR AN INDEPENDENT TOMORROW ↗
- Who funds UMC FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Las Vegas Metropolitan PD Foundation ↗
- Who funds FUTURE SMILES ↗
- Who funds ASSISTING LIVES IN LAS VEGAS ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF GREATER LAS VEGAS ↗
- Who funds NEVADA SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds SPREAD THE WORD NEVADA ↗
- Who funds LEND A HAND OF BOULDER CITY ↗
- Who funds DRESS FOR SUCCESS SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF NEVADA ↗
- Who funds HOOKERS FOR JESUS ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds LAS VEGAS RESCUE MISSION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Southern Nevada · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · NV Energy Charitable Foundation · Wynn Resorts Foundation · Canarelli Family Foundation · Vegas Golden Knights Foundation Inc · Engelstad Family Foundation · Three Square · Speedway Children's Charities · The Mel & Ruth Wolzinger Foundation · Mondays Dark · Raiders Foundation Nv
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Mgm Resorts Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Empower Her Network Inc Dba Empowered Network — 47% of income from government
- Covenant House New Jersey Inc — 34% of income from government
- Community Advocates for Family and Youth — 23% of income from government
- Casaprince George's County Inc — 17% of income from government
- Prince George's Child Resource Centerinc — 17% of income from government
- United Communities Against Poverty Inc — 17% of income from government
- Living Classrooms Foundation — 7% of income from government
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
- A Wider Circle Inc — 6% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- A Place for Us Atlantic County Womens Center — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Mgm Resorts Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Mgm Resorts Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.