· Private foundation
NV Energy Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k108 grants · $206k
- $10k–50k75 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k21 grants · $1.7M
- $250k+3 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| United Way of Southern Nevada | $500,000 |
| United Way of Northern Nevada & the Sierra | $448,442 |
| University of Nevada Reno Foundation | $250,000 |
| United Way of Southern Nevada | $243,484 |
| Three Square | $125,000 |
| The Public Education Foundation | $100,000 |
| Community Foundation of Northern Nevada | $100,000 |
| Food Bank of Northern Nevada | $100,000 |
| Rebuilding Together So Nevada | $100,000 |
| Friends of the Marzen House | $75,000 |
| Three Square | $75,000 |
| The Nature Conservancy | $75,000 |
| Serving Our Kids Foundation | $75,000 |
| Walker River Paiute Tribe | $75,000 |
| HELP of Southern Nevada | $70,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 95% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
232 repeat relationships — 104 still active in FY2025, 128 since wound down; 69 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $336k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UOUNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION6× · 2020–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +32%
- CCCLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC6× · 2020–2025 · $790k · revenue +13%
- UWUNITED WAY OF NORTHERN NEVADA AND THE SIERRA5× · 2020–2025 · $637k · revenue +170%
Funded once
- UWUnited Way of Southern Nevada- Proj REACHone grant, 2021 · $500k
- UWUNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN NEVADA - PROJECT REACHone grant, 2020 · $500k
- FPFallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribeone grant, 2024 · $250k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Our membership is united in pursuit of immediate and continuous improvements to the state's education system. we support an ambitious, agressive and comprehensive reform agenda to dramatically increase the college and workforce readiness…
To promote fair government practices and for all other legal purposes
To uplift the indigenous community by building political power.
CSNV is engaged in comprehensive community development projects that promote neighborhood revitalization and economic development, community education and civic action, housing, development; cultural awareness, equity and
The nevada council on problem gambling is a non-profit information and referral agency whose efforts are focused on reducing the impact of problem gambling on individuals, families and communities in nevada. it is the mission of the nevada…
The nevada state parks foundation is dedicated to enhancing and preserving the natural beauty, cultural heritage and recreational opportunities within the nevada division of state parks. the foundation is committed to supporting the…
Wild horse protection, preservation, rescue and care work.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Chest Inc and the most unlike its peers is Fallon 1908 Fastpitch. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 8. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 38% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 22% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
286 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 286 of the 501 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA LAS VEGAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds CLARK COUNTY PUBLIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF NORTHERN NEVADA AND THE SIERRA ↗
- Who funds THREE SQUARE ↗
- Who funds University of Nevada Reno Foundation ↗
- Who funds TAHOE FUND ↗
- Who funds Community Foundation of Northern Nevada ↗
- Who funds LEGAL AID CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds Food Bank of Northern Nevada Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF NEVADA INC ↗
- Who funds NEVADA STATE COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HELP OF SOUTHERN NEVADA ↗
- Who funds OPPORTUNITY VILLAGE ↗
- Who funds Las Vegas Metropolitan PD Foundation ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE OF SOUTHERN NEVADA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds WESTERN NEVADA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds KEEP TRUCKEE MEADOWS BEAUTIFUL ↗
- Who funds Nevada Outdoor School ↗
- Who funds NEVADA CLEAN ENERGY FUND ↗
- Who funds WESTERN FOLKLIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds SERVING OUR KIDS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of Northern Nevada ↗
- Who funds THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE ENVIROLUTION INC ↗
- Who funds TECH IMPACT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Southern Nevada · Community Foundation of Northern Nevada · Nevada Community Foundation Inc · Mgm Resorts Foundation · The E L Cord Foundation · Dermody Properties Foundation · Canarelli Family Foundation · The Nell J Redfield Foundation · Wynn Resorts Foundation · Robert Z Hawkins Foundation · Renown Health · Engelstad Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization NV Energy Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to NV Energy Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to NV Energy Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.