Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

THRIVE WASHINGTON

THRIVE WASHINGTON (Washington) receives grants from 13 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,346,263 to it, the largest being GATES FOUNDATION ($695,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2019
$2.5M
Funders on record
13
Grants received
$1.3M
Net assets
$3.5M
1/13 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 50%
01What it does

What Thrive Washington does

Mission

Thrive Washington advances high-quality early learning - with a commitment to innovation and equity - throughout washington state. We work with partners to activate communities, advocate for young children and families, and influence public and private investment.

As stated on its FY2019 Form 990.

Program

Family engagementincludes: home visiting services account (hvsa)in 2011, thrive & several stakeholders & community partners worked together to develop a washington state home visiting plan that articulates high-level goals & prioritized objectives for infrastructure-building & implementation of a home visiting system. The hvsa was established by the state legislature. The department of children, youth, and families oversees hvsa grants and contracts; thrive supports programs and help communities expand ongoing availability of services, service delivery & access, and quality & accountability. Thrive continues to make great progress in ensuring that washington's vulnerable families have access to high-quality, evidence-based home visiting services.1. Serving families - the hvsa serves about 2,500 children statewide with a variety of home visiting models that meet the needs of diverse populations.2. Developing the field - funds work to increase the state's capacity to not only serve more families, but also serve them with the highest quality. Thrive hv team helps make sure programs have what they need to deliver on their model's promise to children and families. 3. Centralizing…

The first program described on its most recent Form 990, which lists programs largest first by expense.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($15M) Expenses 100 ($17M) Net assets 100 ($7.3M)2018 Revenue 15 ($2.2M) Expenses 29 ($4.8M) Net assets 64 ($4.7M)2019 Revenue 17 ($2.5M) Expenses 22 ($3.7M) Net assets 48 ($3.5M)
201720182019
Revenue (17)Expenses (22)Net assets (48)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2017 to 2018, from $9.8M to $5.3M (−46%).

$9.8M
$5.3M
$3.7M
201720182019
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 78% · 2018 10% · 2019 19%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.

−$2.3M
’17
−$2.6M
’18
−$1.2M
’19
2.5
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

201720182019
Listed282421
Joined·+2+8
No longer listed·611
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2020: the base narrowed from 6 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $68k → $13.

2 of 13 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 1% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THRIVE WASHINGTON’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THRIVE WASHINGTON leans on a few funders — its largest provides 52% of grant income and the top three 93%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

52%
largest funder
93%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 37% · 2018 53% · 2019 63% · 2020 100% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

0% of THRIVE WASHINGTON's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 8% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2020, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

62% of THRIVE WASHINGTON's grant income comes from Washington funders.

WA
MI

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $16k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like THRIVE WASHINGTON

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

72% of spending goes to programs.

Program 72%Management 24%Fundraising 5%

Governance

12
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

91%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THRIVE WASHINGTON: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THRIVE WASHINGTON?
THRIVE WASHINGTON (Washington) receives grants from 13 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,346,263 to it, the largest being GATES FOUNDATION ($695,000). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THRIVE WASHINGTON have?
IRS filings report 13 organizations giving $1,346,263 in grants to THRIVE WASHINGTON, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THRIVE WASHINGTON?
GATES FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $695,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THRIVE WASHINGTON find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2019 (financials across 2017–2019), and the filings of 13 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing