Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

JF Maddox Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
159
Grants FY2024still arriving
20
States reached
$516k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Education$9.6MHealth$7.9MPhilanthropy$7.6MArts & Culture$2.4MHousing & Shelter$1.6MYouth Development$939kHuman Services$710kReligion$690kOther$0
02FY2024 · 159 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k98 grants · $386k
  • $10k–50k45 grants · $938k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $949k
  • $250k+5 grants · $1.9M
$5,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$247M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Habitat for Humanity International Inc$515,500
Individual grant recipient$400,000
United Way of Lea County Inc$386,221
Golden Apple Foundation For Excellence In Teaching$300,000
Southwest Foundation for Osteopathic Education and Research$286,125
Hobbs Hispano Chamber of Commerce Foundation$146,719
New Mexico Junior College$124,197
Encore Entertainment Inc$121,000
Boys Club of Hobbs Inc$116,155
Lovington Mainstreet Corporation$95,878
Sacramento Camp and Conference Center Inc$81,000
Lea County Commission for the Arts Inc$64,000
University of the Southwest$50,250
God First Ministries$50,000
Sheri's House of Hope Inc$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $584k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Jones Center for Families Inc: $1k → 14%YouthBridge Community Foundation: $25k → 11%New Mexico Christian Children's Home: $12k → 18%YouthBridge Community Foundation: $13k → 11%Ferguson Youth Initiative: $5k → 11%YMCA of the North Shore Inc: $15k → 10%Women's Economic Self-Sufficiency Team: $27k → 14%Women's Economic Self-Sufficiency Team: $24k → 14%Women's Economic Self-Sufficiency Team: $6k → 20%Women's Economic Self-Sufficiency Team: $11k → 14%Freedom 5 One Ministries Inc: $2k → 14%Women's Economic Self-Sufficiency Team: $11k → 14%Chaves County Casa Program: $500 → 20%Freedom 5one Ministries: $1k → 14%Covenant Village Inc: $30k → 12%Covenant Village Inc: $25k → 12%Covenant Village Inc: $25k → 12%All Faiths Children's Advocacy Center: $250 → 14%Covenant Village Inc: $25k → 12%Covenant Village Inc: $1k → 12%charity water: $5k → 17%Covenant Village Inc: $1k → 12%New Mexico Ramp Project: $21k → 14%New Mexico Ramp Project: $11k → 14%New Mexico Ramp Project: $10k → 14%Connecting Point of Park Cities: $5k → 14%MyPower Inc: $78k → 19%Option Inc: $50k → 19%Opportunity House Inc: $50k → 19%WHI Hobbs: $37k → 19%Justice House: $10k → 19%LEADERS Industries Inc: $8k → 19%Project 40 31 Inc: $7k → 19%Project 40 31 Inc: $7k → 19%Project 40 31: $7k → 19%Project 40 31 Inc: $7k → 19%Project 40 31 Inc: $7k → 19%Cissy Food Ministry: $3k → 19%Justice House: $3k → 19%Option Inc: $1k → 19%Option Inc: $1k → 19%Option Inc: $750 → 19%Cissy Food Ministry: $500 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$20M · 178 repeat orgs$13M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

178 repeat relationships — 96 still active in FY2024, 82 since wound down; 58 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

178
164

Total granted

$20M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+17%

Still filing today

54%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $804k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF LEA COUNTY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +32% · 47% of their budget
  • GA
    GOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING
    3× · 2022–2024 · $600k · revenue +77%
  • LM
    LOVINGTON MAINSTREET CORP
    5× · 2020–2024 · $497k · revenue +93% · 55% of their budget

Funded once

  • CH
    COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM
    one grant, 2023 · $5.8M · revenue +12%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY TRUST
    one grant, 2021 · $5.0M · revenue +3% · 99% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $278k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce

The greater albuquerque chamber of commerce works every day to make our community a place where businesses can grow and prosper, where people want to raise their families and where tourists want to visit. as the voice of business since…

—
2
New Mexico Community Development Loan Fund Inc

See schedule othe loan fund was formed to encourage and facilitate the investment of capital in low-income new mexico communities through individuals, religious and community organizations, foundations, government entities, lending…

—
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
5
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
6
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
Gallup Community Health

Gallup community health's mission is to provide excellent and accessible medical care to our community, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
9
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
10
Northern New Mexicans Protecting Land Water and Rights Inc

Northern new mexicans protecting land water and rights strives to lessen the stress of neighborhood tensions due to lack of information and fair representation. by providing an organization whose main goal is to unite and empower the…

—
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
New Mexico Perinatal Collaborative

The mission of the new mexico perinatal collaborative is to convene stakeholders to achieve health equity through the promotion of evidence- based reproductive and perinatal health practices that: increase collaboration with communities…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Taos Community Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Melrose Youth Trap Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsLocal History MuseumsHealth Access Advocacy and …Community FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesFood Banks and PantriesAddiction Recovery ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Youth Development CentersElementary Literacy TutoringWomen & Girls Leadership De…Animal Rescue and ShelterYouth Mentoring ProgramsMilitary Veterans SupportEnvironmental Conservation …Policy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Arts CentersChristian Youth CampsYouth Sports ProgramsChristian Missionary Organi…Independent K-12 SchoolsCancer Support ServicesYmca Youth DevelopmentChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…United Way AffiliatesAffordable Housing Construc…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%3%<5yr12%6%5–10yr19%17%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr16%25%35–55yr18%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%1%<5yr12%26%5–10yr19%6%10–20yr17%39%20–35yr16%10%35–55yr18%19%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.4%1/244
the rest of the field
12%
1,110/9,396

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

207 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 207 of the 413 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
45
Early backer (in before they grew)
201/207
Grantees still filing
137/207
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HOBBS MUNICIPAL SCHOOLS — $5,077,141 · OtherHOBBS MUNICIPAL SCHOOLSNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY TRUST — $5,000,000 · OtherNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY TRUSTUNITED WAY OF LEA COUNTY INC — $1,954,309 · OtherUNITED WAY OF LEA COUNTY INCIndividual grant recipient — $1,179,139 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHabitat for Humanity International Inc — $846,838 · Other+118 more — $7,994,399 · Other+118 moreCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM — $5,800,000 · HealthCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM+13 more — $1,007,529 · Health+13 moreWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $150,000 · EducationHOBBS HISPANO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDA — $146,719 · EducationSALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE — $123,750 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHWEST — $122,250 · EducationHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION — $108,250 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC — $92,500 · EducationBridges Project for Education — $80,000 · EducationTHE MCCALLIE SCHOOL — $45,000 · Education+21 more — $416,850 · EducationLOVINGTON MAINSTREET CORP — $497,136 · Arts & CultureLEA COUNTY MUSEUM INC — $127,426 · Arts & CultureLEA COUNTY COMMISSION FOR THE ARTS INC — $83,850 · Arts & CultureThe Paseo Project Inc — $70,000 · Arts & CultureLEADERSHIP NEW MEXICO — $57,500 · Arts & CultureDallas Museum of Art — $50,000 · Arts & Culture+8 more — $168,600 · Arts & CultureMYPOWER INC — $279,000 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INC — $115,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT VILLAGE INC — $107,000 · Human ServicesCISSY FOOD MINISTRY — $82,450 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP — $77,875 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY HOUSE INC — $57,500 · Human ServicesOPTION INC — $54,250 · Human ServicesNew Mexico Ramp Project — $41,000 · Human ServicesYOUTHBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $37,500 · Human ServicesWHI HOBBS INC — $37,270 · Human ServicesPROJECT 40 31 INC — $32,500 · Human Services+3 more — $39,500 · Human ServicesHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HOBBS NM — $513,995 · Housing & ShelterHEARTS DESIRE INC — $87,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more — $10,500 · Housing & ShelterSACRAMENTO CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC — $389,000 · ReligionISAIAH'S SOUP KITCHEN — $87,905 · ReligionROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS — $75,000 · Religion
Other$22,051,826Health$6,807,529Education$1,285,319Arts & Culture$1,054,512Human Services$960,845Housing & Shelter$611,495Religion$551,905

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM — $5,800,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY TRUST — $5,000,000 over 1y, 99% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LEA COUNTY INC — $1,954,309 over 5y, 47% of budgetGOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING — $600,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetENCORE ENTERTAINMENT INC — $567,625 over 5y, 74% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HOBBS NM — $513,995 over 2y, 57% of budgetLOVINGTON MAINSTREET CORP — $497,136 over 5y, 55% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HOBBS INC — $405,573 over 5y, 9.5% of budgetSACRAMENTO CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC — $389,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetMYPOWER INC — $279,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetWEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE — $200,167 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER — $200,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION — $178,750 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGUIDANCE CENTER OF LEA COUNTY INC — $163,312 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $158,912 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $150,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican College of Cardiology Foundation — $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATIONS INC — $150,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC — $148,300 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOBBS HISPANO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDA — $146,719 over 1y, 63% of budgetLEA COUNTY MUSEUM INC — $127,426 over 4y, 47% of budgetSALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE — $123,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHWEST — $122,250 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC — $115,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION — $108,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT VILLAGE INC — $107,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC — $92,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetISAIAH'S SOUP KITCHEN — $87,905 over 4y, 21% of budgetHEARTS DESIRE INC — $87,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetLEA COUNTY COMMISSION FOR THE ARTS INC — $83,850 over 4y, 32% of budgetCISSY FOOD MINISTRY — $82,450 over 5y, 32% of budgetBridges Project for Education — $80,000 over 5y, 9.9% of budgetONE LOVE WORLDWIDE — $79,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetWOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP — $77,875 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTexas 2036 — $75,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS — $75,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetThe Phoenix House Sexual Assault & Domestic Violence Resource Center — $74,010 over 5y, 11% of budgetCASA of Lea County — $72,250 over 3y, 14% of budgetThe Paseo Project Inc — $70,000 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $68,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSheris House of Hope Inc — $68,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetColorado Outdoor Education Center Inc — $65,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTEEN COURT OF LEA COUNTY INC — $60,000 over 2y, 80% of budgetPALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM OF LEA COUNTY INC — $57,600 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetLEADERSHIP NEW MEXICO — $57,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetOPPORTUNITY HOUSE INC — $57,500 over 3y, 10% of budgetOPTION INC — $54,250 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetDallas Museum of Art — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LEA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING ↗
  • Who funds ENCORE ENTERTAINMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HOBBS NM ↗
  • Who funds LOVINGTON MAINSTREET CORP ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HOBBS INC ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MYPOWER INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE ↗
  • Who funds ST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GUIDANCE CENTER OF LEA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds American College of Cardiology Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOBBS HISPANO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDA ↗
  • Who funds LEA COUNTY MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds SALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Lea Cou…The Taos Community Fo…Santa Fe Community Fo…Pnm Tnmp FoundationCon Alma Health Found…Los Alamos National L…Albuquerque Community…Smith & Watson Founda…New Mexico Community …Marshall L and Perrin…Xcel Energy FoundationNusenda Foundation
United Way of Lea County IncNM38.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Lea County Inc · The Taos Community Foundation Inc · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Smith & Watson Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Xcel Energy Foundation · Nusenda Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization JF Maddox Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
  • United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc — 9% of income from government
  • Ymca of the North Shore Inc — 6% of income from government
  • Essex County Community Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
49report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 413 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines