Skip to content
JF Maddox Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

JF Maddox Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$4.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
159
Grants FY2024still arriving
20
States reached
$516k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Education$9.6MHealth$7.9MPhilanthropy$7.6MArts & Culture$2.4MHousing & Shelter$1.6MYouth Development$939kHuman Services$710kReligion$690kOther$0
02FY2024 · 159 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k98 grants · $386k
  • $10k–50k45 grants · $938k
  • $50k–250k11 grants · $949k
  • $250k+5 grants · $1.9M
$5,000
Median grant
20
States reached
$247M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Habitat for Humanity International Inc$515,500
Individual grant recipient$400,000
United Way of Lea County Inc$386,221
Golden Apple Foundation For Excellence In Teaching$300,000
Southwest Foundation for Osteopathic Education and Research$286,125
Hobbs Hispano Chamber of Commerce Foundation$146,719
New Mexico Junior College$124,197
Encore Entertainment Inc$121,000
Boys Club of Hobbs Inc$116,155
Lovington Mainstreet Corporation$95,878
Sacramento Camp and Conference Center Inc$81,000
Lea County Commission for the Arts Inc$64,000
University of the Southwest$50,250
Sheri's House of Hope Inc$50,000
God First Ministries$50,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $584k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Jones Center for Families Inc: $1k → 14%YouthBridge Community Foundation: $25k → 11%New Mexico Christian Children's Home: $12k → 18%YouthBridge Community Foundation: $13k → 11%Ferguson Youth Initiative: $5k → 11%YMCA of the North Shore Inc: $15k → 10%Women's Economic Self-Sufficiency Team: $27k → 14%Women's Economic Self-Sufficiency Team: $24k → 14%Women's Economic Self-Sufficiency Team: $6k → 20%Women's Economic Self-Sufficiency Team: $11k → 14%Freedom 5 One Ministries Inc: $2k → 14%Women's Economic Self-Sufficiency Team: $11k → 14%Chaves County Casa Program: $500 → 20%Freedom 5one Ministries: $1k → 14%Covenant Village Inc: $30k → 12%Covenant Village Inc: $25k → 12%Covenant Village Inc: $25k → 12%All Faiths Children's Advocacy Center: $250 → 14%Covenant Village Inc: $25k → 12%Covenant Village Inc: $1k → 12%charity water: $5k → 17%Covenant Village Inc: $1k → 12%New Mexico Ramp Project: $21k → 14%New Mexico Ramp Project: $11k → 14%New Mexico Ramp Project: $10k → 14%Connecting Point of Park Cities: $5k → 14%MyPower Inc: $78k → 19%Opportunity House Inc: $50k → 19%Option Inc: $50k → 19%WHI Hobbs: $37k → 19%Justice House: $10k → 19%LEADERS Industries Inc: $8k → 19%Project 40 31 Inc: $7k → 19%Project 40 31 Inc: $7k → 19%Project 40 31 Inc: $7k → 19%Project 40 31 Inc: $7k → 19%Project 40 31: $7k → 19%Justice House: $3k → 19%Cissy Food Ministry: $3k → 19%Option Inc: $1k → 19%Option Inc: $1k → 19%Option Inc: $750 → 19%Cissy Food Ministry: $500 → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$20M · 178 repeat orgs$13M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +32% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

178 repeat relationships: 96 still active in FY2024, 82 since wound down; 58 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

178
164

Total granted

$20M
$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+18%

Still filing today

54%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $804k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UW
    UNITED WAY OF LEA COUNTY INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +32% · 47% of their budget
  • GA
    GOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING
    3× · 2022–2024 · $600k · revenue +77%
  • LM
    LOVINGTON MAINSTREET CORP
    5× · 2020–2024 · $497k · revenue +93% · 55% of their budget

Funded once

  • CH
    COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM
    one grant, 2023 · $5.8M · revenue +12%
  • NM
    NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY TRUST
    one grant, 2021 · $5.0M · revenue +3% · 99% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $278k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce

The greater albuquerque chamber of commerce works every day to make our community a place where businesses can grow and prosper, where people want to raise their families and where tourists want to visit. as the voice of business since…

—
2
New Mexico Community Development Loan Fund Inc

See schedule othe loan fund was formed to encourage and facilitate the investment of capital in low-income new mexico communities through individuals, religious and community organizations, foundations, government entities, lending…

—
3
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
4
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
5
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
6
American Gas Association

American gas association's (the association) mission is to develop and advocate for informed, innovative, and durable policy that fulfills our nation's energy needs, environmental aspirations and economic potential. we are committed to…

—
7
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
8
Gallup Community Health

Gallup community health's mission is to provide excellent and accessible medical care to our community, regardless of ability to pay.

Health
9
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
10
Northern New Mexicans Protecting Land Water and Rights Inc

Northern new mexicans protecting land water and rights strives to lessen the stress of neighborhood tensions due to lack of information and fair representation. by providing an organization whose main goal is to unite and empower the…

—
11
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
12
New Mexico Perinatal Collaborative

The mission of the new mexico perinatal collaborative is to convene stakeholders to achieve health equity through the promotion of evidence- based reproductive and perinatal health practices that: increase collaboration with communities…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Taos Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Melrose Youth Trap Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

207 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 207 of the 413 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
46
Early backer (in before they grew)
201/207
Grantees still filing
137/207
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

HOBBS MUNICIPAL SCHOOLS: $5,077,141 · OtherHOBBS MUNICIPAL SCHOOLSNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY TRUST: $5,000,000 · OtherNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY TRUSTUNITED WAY OF LEA COUNTY INC: $1,954,309 · OtherUNITED WAY OF LEA COUNTY INCIndividual grant recipient: $1,179,139 · OtherIndividual grant recipientHabitat for Humanity International Inc: $846,838 · Other+119 more: $8,004,399 · Other+119 moreCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM: $5,800,000 · HealthCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM+13 more: $1,007,529 · Health+13 moreWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $150,000 · EducationHOBBS HISPANO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDA: $146,719 · EducationSALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE: $123,750 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHWEST: $122,250 · EducationHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $108,250 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $92,500 · EducationBridges Project for Education: $80,000 · EducationTHE MCCALLIE SCHOOL: $45,000 · Education+20 more: $406,850 · EducationLOVINGTON MAINSTREET CORP: $497,136 · Arts & CultureLEA COUNTY MUSEUM INC: $127,426 · Arts & CultureLEA COUNTY COMMISSION FOR THE ARTS INC: $83,850 · Arts & CultureThe Paseo Project Inc: $70,000 · Arts & CultureLEADERSHIP NEW MEXICO: $57,500 · Arts & CultureDallas Museum of Art: $50,000 · Arts & Culture+8 more: $168,600 · Arts & CultureMYPOWER INC: $279,000 · Human ServicesCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $115,000 · Human ServicesCOVENANT VILLAGE INC: $107,000 · Human ServicesCISSY FOOD MINISTRY: $82,450 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP: $77,875 · Human ServicesOPPORTUNITY HOUSE INC: $57,500 · Human ServicesOPTION INC: $54,250 · Human ServicesNew Mexico Ramp Project: $41,000 · Human ServicesYOUTHBRIDGE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $37,500 · Human ServicesWHI HOBBS INC: $37,270 · Human ServicesPROJECT 40 31 INC: $32,500 · Human Services+3 more: $39,500 · Human ServicesHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HOBBS NM: $513,995 · Housing & ShelterHEARTS DESIRE INC: $87,000 · Housing & Shelter+1 more: $10,500 · Housing & ShelterSACRAMENTO CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC: $389,000 · ReligionISAIAH'S SOUP KITCHEN: $87,905 · ReligionROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS: $75,000 · Religion
Other$22,061,826Health$6,807,529Education$1,275,319Arts & Culture$1,054,512Human Services$960,845Housing & Shelter$611,495Religion$551,905

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM: $5,800,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetNEW MEXICO COMMUNITY TRUST: $5,000,000 over 1y, 99% of budgetUNITED WAY OF LEA COUNTY INC: $1,954,309 over 5y, 47% of budgetGOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING: $600,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetENCORE ENTERTAINMENT INC: $567,625 over 5y, 74% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HOBBS NM: $513,995 over 2y, 57% of budgetLOVINGTON MAINSTREET CORP: $497,136 over 5y, 55% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HOBBS INC: $405,573 over 5y, 9.5% of budgetSACRAMENTO CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC: $389,000 over 4y, 6.4% of budgetMYPOWER INC: $279,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetWEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE: $200,167 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER: $200,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetCOVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION: $178,750 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGUIDANCE CENTER OF LEA COUNTY INC: $163,312 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $158,912 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAmerican College of Cardiology Foundation: $150,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATIONS INC: $150,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY: $150,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC: $148,300 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHOBBS HISPANO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDA: $146,719 over 1y, 63% of budgetLEA COUNTY MUSEUM INC: $127,426 over 4y, 47% of budgetSALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE: $123,750 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHWEST: $122,250 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $115,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION: $108,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOVENANT VILLAGE INC: $107,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO FOUNDATION INC: $92,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetISAIAH'S SOUP KITCHEN: $87,905 over 4y, 21% of budgetHEARTS DESIRE INC: $87,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetLEA COUNTY COMMISSION FOR THE ARTS INC: $83,850 over 4y, 32% of budgetCISSY FOOD MINISTRY: $82,450 over 5y, 32% of budgetBridges Project for Education: $80,000 over 5y, 9.9% of budgetONE LOVE WORLDWIDE: $79,000 over 5y, 14% of budgetWOMEN'S ECONOMIC SELF-SUFFICIENCY TEAM CORP: $77,875 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN YOUTH CORPS: $75,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTexas 2036: $75,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe Phoenix House Sexual Assault & Domestic Violence Resource Center: $74,010 over 5y, 11% of budgetCASA of Lea County: $72,250 over 3y, 14% of budgetThe Paseo Project Inc: $70,000 over 4y, 9.5% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $68,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSheris House of Hope Inc: $68,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetColorado Outdoor Education Center Inc: $65,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTEEN COURT OF LEA COUNTY INC: $60,000 over 2y, 80% of budgetPALMER DRUG ABUSE PROGRAM OF LEA COUNTY INC: $57,600 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetLEADERSHIP NEW MEXICO: $57,500 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetOPPORTUNITY HOUSE INC: $57,500 over 3y, 10% of budgetOPTION INC: $54,250 over 4y, 8.0% of budgetDallas Museum of Art: $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO COMMUNITY TRUST ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF LEA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds GOLDEN APPLE FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING ↗
  • Who funds ENCORE ENTERTAINMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF HOBBS NM ↗
  • Who funds LOVINGTON MAINSTREET CORP ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HOBBS INC ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO CAMP AND CONFERENCE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds MYPOWER INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST TEXAS COUNSELING AND GUIDANCE ↗
  • Who funds ST PHILIPS SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HEALTH SYSTEM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GUIDANCE CENTER OF LEA COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds ESSEX COUNTY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds American College of Cardiology Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FOUNDATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF GREATER ST LOUIS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOBBS HISPANO CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOUNDA ↗
  • Who funds LEA COUNTY MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds SALEM ACADEMY AND COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF THE SOUTHWEST ↗
  • Who funds CHARITY GLOBAL INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLLINS UNIVERSITY CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Lea Cou…The Taos Community Fo…Santa Fe Community Fo…Pnm Tnmp FoundationCon Alma Health Found…Los Alamos National L…Albuquerque Community…Smith & Watson Founda…New Mexico Community …Marshall L and Perrin…Xcel Energy FoundationNusenda Foundation
United Way of Lea County IncNM38.7× affinity16 shared granteesties to 6 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Lea County Inc · The Taos Community Foundation Inc · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Los Alamos National Laboratory Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Smith & Watson Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Xcel Energy Foundation · Nusenda Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization JF Maddox Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from JF Maddox Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 9%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology: 35% of income from government
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc: 23% of income from government
  • Reach Out and Read Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Ymca of the North Shore Inc: 6% of income from government
  • Essex County Community Foundation Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Global Empowerment Mission Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
49report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 413 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on JF Maddox’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home