Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

California Immigrant Policy Center

The CALIFORNIA IMMIGRANT POLICY CENTER upholds the humanity of immigrant communities in california by transforming systems to achieve racial, social, and economic justice.

$1.5M
Granted FY2024still arriving
54
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$88k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.

Health$749kCivil Rights$651kCommunity Improvement$445kHuman Services$209kCrime & Legal$208kEmployment$114kEducation$95kArts & Culture$88kOther$0
02FY2024 · 54 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k46 grants · $1.0M
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $500k
$20,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CAIR-LA (COUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS)$88,392
COMMUNITY ACTION BOARD OF SANTA CRUZ CO INC$83,592
SERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS & EDUCATION NETWORK (SIREN)$81,960
CARECEN (CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER OF CALIFORNIA)$81,960
SAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER INC$81,960
EDUCATION AND LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION$81,960
MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH ACCESS$29,000
TODEC LEGAL CENTER (PERRIS)$28,000
SURVIVORS OF TORTURE INTERNATIONAL$28,000
ASIAN RESOURCES INC$28,000
ORALE (ORGANIZING ROOTED IN ABOLITION LIBERATION & EMPOWERMENT)$28,000
FILIPINO MIGRANT CENTER$28,000
INLAND COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE$28,000
CENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION COLLABORATIVE$28,000
CLINICA MONS OSCAR A ROMERO$28,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $589k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS & EDUCATION NETWORK (SIREN): $82k → 8%UPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY: $20k → 9%INLAND EMPIRE IMMIGRANT YOUTH COLLECTIVE: $20k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF STOCKTON: $10k → 12%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 10%TODEC LEGAL CENTER (PERRIS): $28k → 11%CENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION COLLABORATIVE: $10k → 19%IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER: $10k → 10%JAKARA MOVEMENT: $20k → 19%VILLAGE COMMUNITY RESOURCE CENTER: $22k → 9%LA FAMILIA COUNSELING CENTER INC: $20k → 12%SAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER INC: $82k → 14%CENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION COLLABORATIVE: $45k → 19%CENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION COLLABORATIVE: $10k → 19%SOUTH ASIAN NETWORK: $22k → 14%SOUTH ASIAN NETWORK: $12k → 14%MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH ACCESS: $29k → 14%MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH ACCESS: $25k → 14%GARMENT WORKER CENTER: $20k → 14%CARECEN (CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER OF CALIFORNIA): $82k → 14%THE CHILDREN'S PARTNERSHIP: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

38%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.0M · 16 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +117% since the first grant, against +31% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
22

Total granted

$1.0M
$361k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+117%
+31%

Still filing today

100%
86%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 15% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesCivil RightsCommunity ImprovementHealthEducationCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERS
    6× · 2018–2024 · $112k · revenue +216%
  • TI
    TENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION
    2× · 2019–2020 · $108k · revenue +149%
  • EA
    Education and Leadership Foundation
    2× · 2019–2024 · $97k · revenue +121%

Funded once

  • FAITH IN THE VALLEY
    one grant, 2018 · $75k · revenue -2%
  • MA
    MOVEMENT ADVANCEMENT PROJECTgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +118%
  • CALIFORNIA IMMIGRANT POLICY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue +112%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights

To advance the human & civil rights of immigrants & refugees in los angeles; promote harmonious multi-ethnic human relations.

Civil Rights
2
California Collaborative for Immigrant Justice

Ccij utilizes coordination, advocacy, and legal services to fight for the liberationof immigrants in detention in california. we seek to empower immigrants in detentionand their communities through technical assistance, education, and…

—
3
Southern California Immigration Project

Southern California Immigration Project is a public interest nonprofit organization dedicated to providing pro bono legal services to survivors of human and civil rights violations.

International
4
Asian Law Caucus

The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…

Crime & Legal
5
La Raza Centro Legal - San Francisco

La Raza Centro Legal San Francisco provides high quality, highly trusted, free legal services to low-income or immigrant clients in the San Francisco Bay Area.

—
6
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates Inc

Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.

Human Services
7
Community Legal Services in East Palo Alto Inc

To provide transformative legal services that enable diverse communities in East Palo Alto and beyond to achieve a secure and thriving future.

Crime & Legal
8
Centro Legal De La Raza

Centro Legal De La Raza is a comprehensive legal services agency protecting and advancing the rights of low-income immigrant communities throguh culturally competent bilingual legal representation, education, and advocacy.

Crime & Legal
9
California Center for Movement Legal Services

The California Center for Movement Legal Services (Movement Legal) provides legal services in the pursuit of improving the lives of California's traditionally underserved residents, carrying out legal work that fosters community led policy…

Crime & Legal
10
Valley Immigrant Advocates

Valley immigrant advocates (via) provides primarily immigration legal services, which include: consultation with clients and prospective clients on immigration laws and regulations, and available immigration benefits, etc

Crime & Legal
11
Legal Link

Legal Link removes legal barriers that prolong poverty by adding critically needed capacity to the legal ecosystem.

Crime & Legal
12
Immigrant Defenders Law Center

Immigrant Defenders Law Center (ImmDef) is a next-generation social justice law firm that defends our immigrant communities against injustices in the immigration system.

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Services Immigrant Rights and Education Network (Siren) and the most unlike its peers is United Taxi Workers of San Diego. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%5%<5yr15%15%5–10yr20%12%10–20yr17%37%20–35yr11%22%35–55yr12%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%3%<5yr15%11%5–10yr20%15%10–20yr17%44%20–35yr11%26%35–55yr12%2%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/81
the rest of the field
14%
18,873/131,867

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

62 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 62 of the 83 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
14
Early backer (in before they grew)
62/62
Grantees still filing
39/62
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Central American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California — $81,960 · Human ServicesCentral American Resource…SAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER INC — $81,960 · Human ServicesSAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY …SERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND EDUCATION NETWORK (SIREN) — $81,960 · Human ServicesSERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS…Central Valley Immigrant Integration Collaborative — $65,000 · Human ServicesCentral Valley Immigrant …Maternal and Child Health Access — $54,000 · Human ServicesMaternal and Child Health…SOUTH ASIAN NETWORK INC — $34,000 · Human ServicesSOUTH ASIAN NETWORK INCTodec Legal Center Perris — $28,000 · Human ServicesVillage Community Resource Center — $22,000 · Human Services+9 more — $155,000 · Human Services+9 moreInland Congregations United for Change Sponsoring Committee Inc — $90,500 · OtherInland Congregations United for Ch…SURVIVORS OF TORTURE INTERNATIONAL — $28,000 · OtherCalifornia Rural Legal Assistance Foundation — $28,000 · OtherCENTRAL VALLEY IMMIGRANT INTEGRATION COLLABORATIVE — $28,000 · OtherFILIPINO MIGRANT CENTER — $28,000 · OtherCOUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS CALIFORNIA — $88,392 · OtherCOUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATI…Pangea Legal Services — $40,000 · OtherEast Bay Alliance For A Sustainable Economy — $39,000 · OtherCentro Binacional Para El Desarrollo Indigena Oaxaqueno — $28,000 · Other+23 more — $408,000 · Other+23 moreCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $112,150 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERSORANGE COUNTY CONGREGATION COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION — $82,500 · Community ImprovementORANGE COUNTY CONGR…Central Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy — $79,000 · Community ImprovementCentral Coast Allia…FAITH IN THE VALLEY — $75,000 · Community ImprovementFAITH IN THE VALLEYPILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN — $28,000 · Community ImprovementPILIPINO WORKERS CE…ALLIANCE FOR AFRICAN ASSISTANCE — $22,000 · Community ImprovementSalva — $20,000 · Community Improvement+3 more — $29,000 · Community Improvement+3 moreTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION — $107,500 · Civil RightsTENNESSEE IMMIGR…EQUALITY ALLIANCE OF SAN DIEGO — $66,000 · Civil RightsEQUALITY ALLIANC…MOVEMENT ADVANCEMENT PROJECT — $50,000 · Civil RightsMOVEMENT ADVANCE…AMERICA'S VOICE EDUCATION FUND — $43,500 · Civil RightsAMERICA'S VOICE …UNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC — $36,000 · Civil RightsUNITED WE DREAM …CALIFORNIA IMMIGRANT POLICY CENTER — $30,000 · Civil RightsCALIFORNIA IMMIG…NATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC — $14,000 · Civil Rights+5 more — $44,549 · Civil Rights+5 moreEducation and Leadership Foundation — $96,960 · EducationINLAND COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE — $28,000 · EducationVISION Y COMPROMISO — $25,000 · EducationCENTRAL VALLEY RESOURCE CENTER SERVICES CORP — $20,000 · EducationASIAN RESOURCES INC — $58,000 · HealthCLINICA MSR OSCAR A ROMERO — $28,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCILS INC — $25,000 · HealthVIDA MOBILE CLINIC — $20,000 · HealthCHINESE PROGRESSIVE ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · HealthCALIFORNIA PRIMARY CARE ASSOCIATION — $10,000 · HealthCommunity Action Board — $83,592 · EmploymentMONUMENT IMPACT — $11,250 · Employment
Human Services$603,880Other$805,892Community Improvement$447,650Civil Rights$391,549Education$169,960Health$151,000Employment$94,842

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $112,150 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTENNESSEE IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS COALITION — $107,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetEducation and Leadership Foundation — $96,960 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetInland Congregations United for Change Sponsoring Committee Inc — $90,500 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AMERICAN-ISLAMIC RELATIONS CALIFORNIA — $88,392 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCommunity Action Board — $83,592 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetORANGE COUNTY CONGREGATION COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION — $82,500 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetCentral American Resource Center - CARECEN - of California — $81,960 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSAN BERNARDINO COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER INC — $81,960 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetSERVICES IMMIGRANT RIGHTS AND EDUCATION NETWORK (SIREN) — $81,960 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCentral Coast Alliance United for a Sustainable Economy — $79,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetFAITH IN THE VALLEY — $75,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetEQUALITY ALLIANCE OF SAN DIEGO — $66,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetCentral Valley Immigrant Integration Collaborative — $65,000 over 3y, 4.8% of budgetASIAN RESOURCES INC — $58,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetMaternal and Child Health Access — $54,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMOVEMENT ADVANCEMENT PROJECT — $50,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetAMERICA'S VOICE EDUCATION FUND — $43,500 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetPangea Legal Services — $40,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetEast Bay Alliance For A Sustainable Economy — $39,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetUNITED WE DREAM NETWORK INC — $36,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTH ASIAN NETWORK INC — $34,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA IMMIGRANT POLICY CENTER — $30,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPILIPINO WORKERS CENTER OF SOUTHERN — $28,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCentro Binacional Para El Desarrollo Indigena Oaxaqueno — $28,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTodec Legal Center Perris — $28,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCLINICA MSR OSCAR A ROMERO — $28,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINLAND COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT JUSTICE — $28,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCalifornia Rural Legal Assistance Foundation — $28,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetVISION Y COMPROMISO — $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCILS INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALLIANCE FOR AFRICAN ASSISTANCE — $22,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRichmond Community Foundation — $22,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetVillage Community Resource Center — $22,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetUNITED TAXI WORKERS OF SAN DIEGO — $22,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetCENTRAL VALLEY RESOURCE CENTER SERVICES CORP — $20,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetIMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCE CENTER — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGarment Worker Center — $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity Health Partnership Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetUPVALLEY FAMILY CENTERS OF NAPA COUNTY — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSalva — $20,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetLa Familia Counseling Center Inc — $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJAKARA MOVEMENT — $20,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetVIDA MOBILE CLINIC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetINLAND EMPIRE IMMIGRANT YOUTH COLLECTIVE — $20,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetMIXTECO INDIGENA COMMUNITY ORGANIZING PROJECT — $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH MAIN STREET FUND — $14,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC — $14,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Immigrant Legal Resou…The California Endowm…The California Wellne…Kaiser Foundation Hos…Weingart FoundationThe James Irvine Foun…Sierra Health Foundat…Latino Community Foun…Grantmakers Concerned…Tides FoundationPublic Health Institu…Tides Center
Immigrant Legal Resource CenterCA58.7× affinity26 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Immigrant Legal Resource Center · The California Endowment · The California Wellness Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Weingart Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Sierra Health Foundation Center for Health Program Management · Latino Community Foundation · Grantmakers Concerned With Immigrants and Refugees · Tides Foundation · Public Health Institute · Tides Center

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization California Immigrant Policy Center funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    27report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 83 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines