Skip to content

Illinois · Nonprofit

COALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCAC

COALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCAC (Illinois) receives grants from 17 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,065,530 to it, the largest being JOHN D AND CATHERINE T MACARTHUR FOUNDATION ($800,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$1.7M
Funders on record
17
Grants received
$2.1M
Net assets
$1.5M
9/17 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 78%
01What it does

What Coalition for a Better Chinese American Community Cbcac does

Mission

The coalition for a better chinese american community (cbcac) unites the resources of member organizations and indivdual members to empower chinese american communities in greater chicago. As a coalition member organizations and individuals cbcac carries out its mission through civic eucation, issue advocacy, communication with policy makers, and community mobilization.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Community planning - the organization works towards a sustainable future by leading chinatown's urban planning and development, building on the framework developed in the award-winning chinatown community vision plan.

    $412,609 spent$4,301 earned by the program
    54% of program spending
  2. Civic engagement - the organization aims to amplify the community's voices through civic engagement. The organization have registered thousands of new voters since 2008 and helped voters navigate through language and cultural barriersto cast their barriers.

    $128,309 spent
    17% of program spending
  3. Civic leadership - the organization works to provide a connection with the community to support each other and become stronger. The organization has phone banked to provide covid-19 support, emergency rental application assistance, and other services.

    $122,425 spent
    16% of program spending
  4. Other programs - the organization works with aapi youth in chicago to create positive change by learning about identity, building leadership skills, and engaging in communitiies.

    $105,268 spent
    14% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $768,611.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2018, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2018, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20182018 Revenue 100 ($196k) Expenses 100 ($131k) Net assets 100 ($65k)2019 Revenue 105 ($206k) Expenses 112 ($147k) Net assets 192 ($125k)2020 Revenue 162 ($318k) Expenses 233 ($305k) Net assets 212 ($138k)2021 Revenue 207 ($406k) Expenses 311 ($406k) Net assets 289 ($188k)2022 Revenue 332 ($649k) Expenses 405 ($529k) Net assets 473 ($308k)2023 Revenue 544 ($1.1M) Expenses 446 ($583k) Net assets 1214 ($790k)2024 Revenue 467 ($913k) Expenses 652 ($851k) Net assets 1308 ($851k)2025 Revenue 875 ($1.7M) Expenses 819 ($1.1M) Net assets 2296 ($1.5M)
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (875)Expenses (819)Net assets (2296)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $891k to $1.6M (+76%).

$65k
$161k
$256k
$212k
$337k
$836k
$891k
$1.6M
'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2019 21% · 2020 36% · 2021 16% · 2022 6% · 2023 2% · 2024 44% · 2025 22%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 1 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$65k
’18
$60k
’19
$13k
’20
−$48
’21
$120k
’22
$482k
’23
$62k
’24
$643k
’25
11
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

2019202020212022202320242025
Listed58911121413
Joined·+4+4+2+3+4+2
No longer listed·130223
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2018 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 6 funders, grant income rose $77k → $409k.

4 of 17 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 18% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of COALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCAC’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 16 of 17 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

COALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCAC leans on a few funders — its largest provides 39% of grant income and the top three 75%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

41% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund COALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCAC.

39%
largest funder
75%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2018 100% · 2020 43% · 2021 37% · 2022 56% · 2023 67% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

75% of COALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCAC's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 53% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

92% of COALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCAC's grant income comes from Illinois funders.

IL
NY
CA
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’20
’21
’22
’23
Illinois out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $374k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like COALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCAC

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Illinois

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

72% of spending goes to programs.

Program 72%Management 26%Fundraising 2%

Governance

13
board members
92%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

60%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

IL

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for COALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCAC: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds COALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCAC?
COALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCAC (Illinois) receives grants from 17 organizations whose IRS filings report $2,065,530 to it, the largest being JOHN D AND CATHERINE T MACARTHUR FOUNDATION ($800,000). 9 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does COALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCAC have?
IRS filings report 17 organizations giving $2,065,530 in grants to COALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCAC, 9 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of COALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCAC?
JOHN D AND CATHERINE T MACARTHUR FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $800,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like COALITION FOR A BETTER CHINESE AMERICAN COMMUNITY CBCAC find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Illinois. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2018–2025), and the filings of 17 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing