· Private foundation
Woods Fund of Chicago
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k5 grants · $22k
- $10k–50k35 grants · $800k
- $50k–250k80 grants · $4.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CROSSROADS FUND | $170,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $150,000 |
| HANA CENTER | $120,000 |
| SOUTHSIDE TOGETHER ORGANIZING FOR POWER | $120,000 |
| KENWOOD OAKLAND COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION | $100,000 |
| CHICAGO COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS | $90,000 |
| BLACK ROOTS ALLIANCE | $90,000 |
| THE CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL | $60,000 |
| CHICAGO COMMUNITY AND WORKERS RIGHTS | $60,000 |
| WESTSIDE RISING | $60,000 |
| ORGANIZING NEIGHBORHOODS FOR EQUALITY NORTHSIDE | $60,000 |
| SOUTHSIDERS ORGANIZED FOR UNITY AND LIBERATION | $60,000 |
| GOODKIDS MADCITY ENGLEWOOD | $60,000 |
| LATINO UNION INC AKA LATINO UNION OF CHICAGO | $60,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.1M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.
113 repeat relationships — 79 still active in FY2024, 34 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CFCROSSROADS FUND INC5× · 2020–2024 · $524k · revenue +167%
- KOKenwood Oakland Community Organization5× · 2020–2024 · $436k · revenue +88%
- STSouthside Together Organizing For Power5× · 2020–2024 · $330k · revenue +261% · 26% of their budget
Funded once
- JCJUST CHICAGO COLLECTIVE (FS BYP100 EDUCATION FUND)one grant, 2021 · $250k
- OCOPEN COLLECTIVE FOUNDATION AKA PATHS (FISCAL SPONSOR THE PRAXIS PROJECT)one grant, 2023 · $100k
Center for Third World Organizinggraduatedone grant, 2022 · $70k · revenue +34%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Chicago Refugee Coalition is a 501c3 non-profit organization dedicated ot the alleviation of human suffering through innovative partnerships, advocacy and community empowerment.
Chicago Votes is a non-partisan, non-profit organization building a more inclusive democracy by putting power in the hands of young Chicagoans. We're engaging and developing a new generation of leaders by opening the doors of government,…
The Network is a group of 40+ member organizations dedicated to improving the lives of those impacted by gender-based violence through education, public policy and advocacy, and connecting community members with direct service providers.…
Serving recently arrived migrants and asylum seekers in the Chicagoland area and is committed to upholding the dignity and human rights of immigrants.
The Alliance of the SouthEast (ASE) builds the capacity of leaders, organizers, and associations that carry out community and social change. We envision a powerful grassroots base that impacts decision makers and wins real improvements in…
The Jewish Council on Urban Affair's (JCUA) longstanding mission is to combat poverty, racism and antisemitism working in partnership with diverse communities. JCUA uses a community organizing model to engage the Jewish community in the…
To achieve parity in economic opportunity for people of color by advancing multiracial leadership in corporate governance, expanding the talent pipline for executive-level management, and growing minority businesses.
At legal aid chicago, we work together to provide high quality civil legal aid to people living in poverty and other vulnerable groups.through advocacy, education, collaboration, and litigation we empower individuals, protect fundamental…
PILI engages, inspires and empowers those advancing equal access to justice.
Champion equitable responses and recovery efforts for the Latinx community impacted by COVID-19
The chicago committee seeks racial and ethnic diversity in the legal profession by collaborating with its law firm and corporate membership to: drive sustainable institutional change at law firms and corporate legal departments; provide…
A grass roots civil rights activisim, community outreach and political empowerment to the community members.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United African Organization and the most unlike its peers is Marguerite Casey Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
135 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 135 of the 254 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CROSSROADS FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Kenwood Oakland Community Organization ↗
- Who funds BYP100 Education Fund ↗
- Who funds Southside Together Organizing For Power ↗
- Who funds THE HANA CENTER ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
- Who funds Lugenia Burns Hope Center ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST ORGANIZING PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ILLINOIS COALITION FOR IMMIGRANT AND REFUGEE RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds The Chicago Community Trust ↗
- Who funds Organizing Neighborhoods For Equality Northside ↗
- Who funds Grassroots Collaborative ↗
- Who funds Latino Union of Chicago ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES UNITED ↗
- Who funds Alliance of Filipinos for Immigrant Rights and Empowerment ↗
- Who funds Workers Center For Racial Just NFP ↗
- Who funds Chicago Workers' Collaborative NFP ↗
- Who funds CENTRO DE TRABAJADORES UNIDOS ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO COMMUNITY BOND FUND ↗
- Who funds Arab American Action Network ↗
- Who funds SOUTHSIDERS ORGANIZED FOR UNITY AND LIBERATION ↗
- Who funds BLOCKS TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds RAISE YOUR HAND FOR ILLINOIS PUBLIC EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds Woodstock Institute ↗
- Who funds BRIGHTON PARK NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds LATINO POLICY FORUM ↗
- Who funds PILSEN ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds SHRIVER CENTER ON POVERTY LAW ↗
- Who funds Enlace Chicago ↗
- Who funds CABRINI GREEN LEGAL AID ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ORGANIZING AND FAMILY ISSUES ↗
- Who funds PASO- WEST SUBURBAN ACTION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO COMMUNITY AND WORKERS RIGHTSNFP ↗
- Who funds First Defense Legal Aid ↗
- Who funds The Juvenile Justice Initiative Attn Elizabeth Clarke ↗
- Who funds Housing Action Illinois ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Polk Bros Foundation Inc · Crossroads Fund Inc · Field Foundation of Illinois · John D and Catherine T Macarthur Foundation · United Way of Metropolitan Chicago Inc · Chicago Foundation for Women · Forefront · The Chicago Community Trust · Lloyd a Fry Foundation · Grand Victoria Foundation · Conant Family Foundation · Julian Grace Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Woods Fund of Chicago funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.