Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

THE RIPPLE EFFECT

THE RIPPLE EFFECT (Washington) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $188,277 to it, the largest being CARSON FOUNDATION ($50,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$41k
Funders on record
12
Grants received
$188k
Net assets
$224k
5/12 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 30%
01What it does

What The Ripple Effect does

Mission

Provide self-sustaining aid to the ixil

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ.

Programs

  1. Eden ixil educational farm. Provides education and sustinence for 20 local communities

    $28,823 spent
    36% of program spending
  2. Model families. Educates local community with best home building and maintenance practices, as well as efficient home improvements

    $19,677 spent
    25% of program spending
  3. Village water projects. Provides services to improve local water conditions and accessibility

    $31,500 spent
    39% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $80,000.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($115k) Expenses 100 ($89k) Net assets 100 ($185k)2018 Revenue 100 ($115k) Expenses 139 ($123k) Net assets 96 ($177k)2019 Revenue 164 ($188k) Expenses 245 ($219k) Net assets 79 ($146k)2020 Revenue 150 ($172k) Expenses 142 ($126k) Net assets 104 ($192k)2021 Revenue 120 ($138k) Expenses 138 ($123k) Net assets 112 ($207k)2022 Revenue 121 ($139k) Expenses 109 ($97k) Net assets 135 ($249k)2023 Revenue 121 ($139k) Expenses 138 ($123k) Net assets 143 ($265k)2024 Revenue 35 ($41k) Expenses 91 ($81k) Net assets 121 ($224k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (35)Expenses (91)Net assets (121)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $146k to $192k (+31%).

$185k
$177k
$146k
$192k
$207k
$249k
$265k
$224k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

100% of THE RIPPLE EFFECT’s revenue is contributions — more reliant on donations than three-quarters of its peers (77% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 10,274 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$26k
’17
−$8k
’18
−$31k
’19
$46k
’20
$15k
’21
$42k
’22
$15k
’23
−$40k
’24

Leadership and staff

Board chair

Teresa Farrell

Chair at large

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990-EZ.

03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 4 funders, grant income rose $18k → $25k.

2 of 12 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 18% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of THE RIPPLE EFFECT’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 11 of 12 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE RIPPLE EFFECT has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 27% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

27%
largest funder
65%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 86% · 2018 92% · 2019 71% · 2020 48% · 2021 38% · 2022 58% · 2023 49% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

50% of THE RIPPLE EFFECT's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 42% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

THE RIPPLE EFFECT draws 97% of its grant income from funders outside Washington, across 9 states in all.

ME
WA
MA
IN
CT
CA
VA
TX
FL

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Washington out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $34k arriving through sponsors registered in 2 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

THE RIPPLE EFFECT's funding base is broadening — from 3 funders to 4 as grant income climbed.

Operating margin−100% · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)−14% · below the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 9,397 community improvement nonprofits under $100k, FY2024

Organizations like THE RIPPLE EFFECT

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

95%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE RIPPLE EFFECT: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE RIPPLE EFFECT?
THE RIPPLE EFFECT (Washington) receives grants from 12 organizations whose IRS filings report $188,277 to it, the largest being CARSON FOUNDATION ($50,000). 5 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE RIPPLE EFFECT have?
IRS filings report 12 organizations giving $188,277 in grants to THE RIPPLE EFFECT, 5 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE RIPPLE EFFECT?
CARSON FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $50,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE RIPPLE EFFECT find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Ripple Effect →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 12 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing