Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Public charity

Donatestock Charitable Inc

Help nonprofits diversify and grow sources of funding by facilitating charitable stock gifting.

$11M
Granted FY2024still arriving
215
Grants FY2024still arriving
35
States reached
$1.9M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.

Public Safety & Disaster$9.6MHealth$3.6MEducation$1.9MReligion$1.3MAnimals$1.1MEnvironment$727kArts & Culture$672kPhilanthropy$653kOther$0
02FY2024 · 215 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 215 grants below total $10,065,427 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $10,585,357 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $519,930 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k87 grants · $627k
  • $10k–50k99 grants · $2.0M
  • $50k–250k24 grants · $2.3M
  • $250k+5 grants · $5.1M
$12,211
Median grant
35
States reached
$2.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
World Central Kitchen$1,944,777
Shriners Hospitals for Chil$1,647,330
Nashville Christian School$832,021
Pledgeling Foundation$382,231
Village Health Works$326,583
Fight for the Future Educ$192,876
Rebecca Bender Initiative$139,430
Sellwood Baptist Church$136,471
Caroga Arts Collective Inc$128,030
Lighthouse Christian Academy$125,894
Southern Bible Institute$120,733
Bellevue Hindu Temple and$110,567
Sunflower Seeds Ukraine - Ukr$101,316
Mission MSA$100,780
Whole Family Health Center In$100,140
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $485k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Hope for Hypothalamic Hamartomas: $7k → 11%Housing Families Inc: $9k → 8%Hope for Hypothalamic Hamarto: $8k → 8%Youth Advocates Program: $10k → 12%Wells of Life Inc: $24k → 10%Homeless Childrens Network: $7k → 10%Womens Nonprofit Alliance: $10k → 5%Jewish Family Community Ser: $10k → 14%Health in the Hood Inc: $10k → 15%Christian Service Mission: $9k → 16%Project Rescue Foundation: $15k → 15%Life Choices Medical Center: $9k → 13%Crisis Assistance Ministry: $32k → 10%Lutheran Life Villages: $28k → 12%The Refugee Response: $10k → 17%Bridge Receiving Center: $5k → 9%Chamber of Mothers Inc: $11k → 10%He Opens Paths to Everyone In: $6k → 6%Hope for Hypothalamic Hamartomas: $7k → 11%WISEPlace: $29k → 10%The Citizens Foundation USA: $9k → 16%Alices Kids Inc: $6k → 6%Junglekeepers: $6k → 9%Wesley Community Center: $27k → 16%Dress for Success Charlotte: $6k → 10%Brooke Owens Fellowship: $106k → 12%PTA of PS154 Brooklyn Inc: $5k → 20%Bradley Angle: $15k → 12%Play for Peace: $26k → 14%Summerhouse Houston: $10k → 16%American Red Cross: $7k → 14%Restore NYC: $7k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
DE
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$16M · 64 repeat orgs$5.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

64 repeat relationships — 60 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 154 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

64
76

Total granted

$16M
$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+11%

Still filing today

92%
87%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.8M went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesInternationalEducationArts & CultureHealthAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +67%
  • NC
    NASHVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $883k · revenue +23%
  • K9S FOR WARRIORS INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $435k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • BC
    Baylor College of Medicine
    one grant, 2023 · $313k · revenue +17%
  • SF
    SPACE FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2022 · $123k · revenue -5%
  • BO
    Brooke Owens Fellowship
    one grant, 2022 · $106k · revenue -44%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Allosource

Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.

Health
2
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
3
Fajr Scientific

To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

Science & Tech
4
American Flood Coalition Inc

To drive transformational adaptation to protect communities across the country from higher seas, stronger storms, and more frequent flooding.

Environment
5
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
6
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
7
Us Digital Response

U.s. digital response is a nonprofit, nonpartisan organization that helps governments, nonprofits, and public entities respond quickly to critical public needs. the organization serves the public by leveraging a network of pro bono…

Public Safety & Disaster
8
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
9
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
10
Common Future

Common future is a network of pioneering leaders across the u.s. and canada who work deeply within their communities to create alternative approaches to business, philanthropy, and investing. we envision an economy that has transitioned…

Community Improvement
11
World Privacy Forum

The world privacy forum is dedicated to reimaging privacy in a digital era through ground-breaking, in-depth privacy research and consumer education of the highest quality. our vision is to empower people with the knowledge, rights, and…

Public Benefit
12
Future 500

See attached statementprimary missionfuture 500 builds trust between corporations, advocates, investors, and philanthropists to advance business as a force for good. we are experts in stakeholder engagement with over 25 years of experience…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Action Against Hunger - Usa and the most unlike its peers is Mindshift Recovery Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyHealth Access Advocacy and …Independent K-12 SchoolsAnimal Rescue and ShelterPolicy Research and AdvocacyChristian Missionary Organi…Community Arts CentersDomestic Violence ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Food Banks and PantriesFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Youth Development CentersWomen & Girls Leadership De…School Parent OrganizationsJewish Community Organizati…Immigrant Worker SupportPregnancy Support ServicesCancer Support ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportYouth Sports ProgramsPublic Library OperationsChristian Youth CampsCommunity College Foundatio…Ymca Youth DevelopmentOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Local History MuseumsSchool District FoundationsUnited Way AffiliatesYouth Development ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Military Veterans SupportYouth Mentoring ProgramsCommunity Food PantriesVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Affordable Housing Developm…Senior Support ServicesCommunity Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 21 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%8%<5yr14%11%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%24%20–35yr13%15%35–55yr16%15%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%2%<5yr14%4%5–10yr19%61%10–20yr16%9%20–35yr13%9%35–55yr16%15%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/295
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,270

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

258 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 258 of the 295 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
256/258
Grantees still filing
137/258
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $9,564,545 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC+14 more — $809,312 · International+14 moreSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $1,845,920 · HealthSHRINERS HOSPI…CHARLESTOWN COMMUNITY INC — $276,522 · HealthCHARLESTOWN CO…WHOLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC — $201,791 · HealthWHOLE FAMILY H…MISSION MSA — $152,300 · HealthMISSION MSAINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR PREMENSTRUAL DISORDERS — $93,649 · Health+9 more — $159,823 · Health+9 moreNASHVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $882,744 · OtherNASHVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOL…REDEMPTION CHURCH SEATTLE — $304,834 · OtherREDEMPTION CHURCH SEATTLEFIGHT FOR THE FUTURE EDUCATION FUND — $192,876 · Other+118 more — $3,601,301 · Other+118 moreBaylor College of Medicine — $312,630 · EducationLIGHTHOUSE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $125,894 · EducationFoster College — $120,733 · EducationNORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $84,312 · EducationSCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC (SMART) — $80,979 · EducationSHINING HOPE FOR COMMUNITIES INC — $67,455 · EducationETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL — $52,905 · Education+10 more — $214,584 · EducationK9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $434,989 · AnimalsHOUSTON PETSET — $337,424 · AnimalsRESCUED PETS MOVEMENT INC — $51,630 · AnimalsHUMANE SOCIETY OF SHELBY COUNTY — $42,710 · Animals+10 more — $186,232 · AnimalsPLEDGELING FOUNDATION — $382,231 · PhilanthropyGVNGorg — $186,233 · PhilanthropyTAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN OF MANATEE COUNTY INC — $51,625 · PhilanthropyCAPITALISTS FOR SHARED INCOME — $48,499 · PhilanthropyLIBERTY UKRAINE FOUNDATION — $41,120 · PhilanthropyLIVE2540 INC — $34,822 · Philanthropy+4 more — $44,278 · PhilanthropyBUILDING DECARBONIZATION COALITION — $278,022 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $217,396 · EnvironmentHOWARD T ODUM FLORIDA SPRINGS INSTITUTE — $98,852 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE — $23,434 · Environment+5 more — $58,447 · Environment
International$10,373,857Health$2,730,005Other$4,981,755Education$1,059,492Animals$1,052,985Philanthropy$788,808Environment$676,151

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $9,564,545 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSHRINERS HOSPITALS FOR CHILDREN — $1,845,920 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetNASHVILLE CHRISTIAN SCHOOLS INC — $882,744 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetK9S FOR WARRIORS INC — $434,989 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetPLEDGELING FOUNDATION — $382,231 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHOUSTON PETSET — $337,424 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetVILLAGE HEALTH WORKS — $326,583 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetBaylor College of Medicine — $312,630 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBUILDING DECARBONIZATION COALITION — $278,022 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetCHARLESTOWN COMMUNITY INC — $276,522 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $217,396 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetWHOLE FAMILY HEALTH CENTER INC — $201,791 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFIGHT FOR THE FUTURE EDUCATION FUND — $192,876 over 1y, 10% of budgetGVNGorg — $186,233 over 3y, 6.1% of budgetMISSION MSA — $152,300 over 2y, 16% of budgetREBECCA BENDER INITIATIVE — $139,430 over 1y, 20% of budgetCAROGA ARTS COLLECTIVE INC — $128,030 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetLIGHTHOUSE CHRISTIAN ACADEMY — $125,894 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetSPACE FOR HUMANITY — $122,803 over 1y, 13% of budgetFoster College — $120,733 over 1y, 15% of budgetBrooke Owens Fellowship — $105,970 over 1y, 17% of budgetHOWARD T ODUM FLORIDA SPRINGS INSTITUTE — $98,852 over 1y, 18% of budgetINTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR PREMENSTRUAL DISORDERS — $93,649 over 1y, 48% of budgetEASTER SEALS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $93,183 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY IN ATLANTA INC — $89,039 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetNORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $84,312 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetSCHOOLS MENTORING AND RESOURCES TEAM INC (SMART) — $80,979 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetMETROPOLIS ENSEMBLE INC — $74,764 over 3y, 7.0% of budgetRAZOM INC — $74,472 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $70,226 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHEARTSUPPORT INC — $70,173 over 1y, 11% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $68,402 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetSHINING HOPE FOR COMMUNITIES INC — $67,455 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF TOPEKA — $65,698 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetGIRL EFFECT INC — $58,567 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL — $52,905 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUED PETS MOVEMENT INC — $51,630 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTAKE STOCK IN CHILDREN OF MANATEE COUNTY INC — $51,625 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetProject Row Houses — $51,405 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetREFUGEE & IMMIGRANT CENTER FOR EDUCATION & LEGAL SERVICES — $51,343 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCAPITALISTS FOR SHARED INCOME — $48,499 over 3y, 20% of budgetKC BLIND ALL-STARS FOUNDATION — $47,845 over 1y, 16% of budgetKIRKLAND CENTER OF THE PERFORMING ARTS DBA KIRKLAND PERFORMANCE CENTER — $46,819 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetALPHA TAU OMEGA FOUNDATION INC — $46,204 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetTHE SENTENCING PROJECT — $44,984 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF SHELBY COUNTY — $42,710 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetLIBERTY UKRAINE FOUNDATION — $41,120 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSan Francisco Playhouse — $37,385 over 3y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Brown Foundation …Endaoment IncThe Powell FoundationMar Vista Investment …MD Anderson FoundationAlbert & Ethel Herzst…Jewish Community Fede…Houston Endowment IncDovetail Impact Found…American Muslim Commu…The Prentice Foundati…Petco Love
The Brown Foundation IncTX17.1× affinity8 shared granteesties to 9 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Brown Foundation Inc · Endaoment Inc · The Powell Foundation · Mar Vista Investment Partners Charitable Foundation · MD Anderson Foundation · Albert & Ethel Herzstein Charitable Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma · Houston Endowment Inc · Dovetail Impact Foundation (Fka David Weekley Family Foundation) · American Muslim Community Foundation · The Prentice Foundation Inc · Petco Love

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Donatestock Charitable Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 160%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
  • Housing Families Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Bradley Angle — 10% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa — 5% of income from government
  • Health in the Hood Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Charlestown Community Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Chapman Partnership Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Shriners Hospitals for Children — 0% of income from government
  • Whole Family Health Center Inc — 0% of income from government
  • K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
16get no government money at all
48report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Donatestock Charitable Inc?

Find your warmest path to Donatestock Charitable Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 295 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home