How much did The Prentice Foundation Inc grant in FY2024?

Civil Rights$2.6MEducation$1.3MHealth$1.2MEnvironment$1.1MPhilanthropy$977kHuman Services$552kYouth Development$453kArts & Culture$414kAnimals$413kOther$4.1M

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

abortion postpost abortionabortion larcssocialmarialatinocommon ground

2021

abortion educationvoting rightsabortion advocacyprotect votingcrossing linepodcast seriesseries accompanying

2022

protect abortionlawyeringtideslibertyaccess reproductiverebuildstudents

2023

beyondkeep abortionbiological sciencesleague womenwomen votersukraineblue

2024

collectors filmlighthouse foundation'slater caremovevoteriderswingbeatreprohub

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 213 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k109 grants · $476k
$10k–50k100 grants · $1.8M
$50k–250k4 grants · $414k

$8,913

Median grant

States reached

$36M

Total assets

Largest grants

ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$150,000
MARGARET BYRD RAWSON INSTITUTE INC$130,000
INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSOCIATION$80,000
AS YOU SOW$54,245
PENNSYLVANIA VOICE$45,000
CLIMATE DEMOCRACY INITIATIVE$45,000
ONE ARIZONA$45,000
NATIONAL WOMENS HEALTH NETWORK INC$40,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC$40,000
THE JEMICY SCHOOL INC$40,000
PROGRESSNOW COLORADO EDUCATION$40,000
THE ALLIANCE FOR COLLECTIVE ACTION$38,000
RURAL ARIZONA ENGAGEMENT$35,000
MSI US$33,555
IRIE FOUNDATION INC$30,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $511k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 11%. 70% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$11M · 275 repeat orgs$2.3M to everyone else

275 repeat relationships — 151 still active in FY2024, 124 since wound down; 44 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

275

159

Total granted

$11M

$1.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%

+65%

Still filing today

79%

80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $623k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Civil RightsEnvironmentHealthEducationHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

MB
MARGARET BYRD RAWSON INSTITUTE INC
5× · 2020–2024 · $547k · revenue +78% · 100% of their budget
AC
ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
5× · 2020–2024 · $533k · revenue +118%
ONE ARIZONA
5× · 2020–2024 · $350k · revenue +416%

Funded once

MC
MAINE CITIZENS FOR CLEAN ELECTIONS
one grant, 2020 · $120k · revenue -25%
A4
ACTIVATE 48 EDUCATION FUNDgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $60k · revenue +1080%
PM
POPULATION MEDIA CENTER INC
one grant, 2021 · $59k · revenue -11%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Planned Parenthood Votes Ct

To protect women's health and reproductive choice through advocacy in connecticut.

—

Blue Ridge Abortion Fund Inc

Financial assistance for people choosing abortion care.

Health

Cobalt Advocates

Cobalt advocates actualizes policies, structures and attitudes that secure unassailable reproductive autonomy and abortion access utilizing the political process and civic engagement.

—

Women's Reproductive Rights Assistance

WRRAP's mission is to ensure that individuals from all walks of life are afforded the equal opportunity to gain access to safe and legal abortion services.

Health

Women Winning

We are changing the face of power by activating pro-choice campaign operatives, candidates, and elected officials who are committed to reproductive health, rights and justice, and working to protect the safety, dignity and bodily autonomy…

Public Benefit

Planned Parenthood Votes Ri

To protect women's health and reproductive choice through advocacy in Rhode Island.

—

American Flood Coalition Inc

Empowering a nonpartisan coalition to advance solutions to flooding.

Environment

Pregnancy Justice Inc

Pregnancy justice fights to protect pregnant people's rights by defending those who have been criminalized or who face other rights violations because of pregnancy, focusing on those most likely to be targeted for state control based on…

Civil Rights

Witness Inc

Witness helps people use video and technology to protect and defend human rights. the organization operates globally. witness' global team designs solutions, provides guidance, and co-develops strategies that enable human rights defenders…

International

Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues.

Environment

CureCervicalCancer

Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.

International

Advocates for the Environment Inc

Public education concerning law and the environment, low-cost legal services to the public and other nonprofit organizations and litigation to advance public interest.

Civil Rights

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is As You Sow and the most unlike its peers is Nova Ukraine. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.8%3/394

the rest of the field

11%

206,161/1,819,171

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

381 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

135

Early backer (in before they grew)

378/381

Grantees still filing

314/381

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$5,403,209Civil Rights$2,618,112Education$1,341,277Health$1,209,192Environment$1,136,269Philanthropy$976,833Human Services$551,811

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Educational Foundation of AmericaMD100.1× affinity51 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Educational Foundation of America · Hopewell Fund · The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation · National Network of Abortion Funds Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Women Donors Network · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · New Venture Fund · Triangle Community Foundation Inc · Telescope Fund · Voter Registration Project · United States Energy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation The Prentice Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

38get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: MARGARET BYRD RAWSON INSTITUTE INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +78% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 522353974 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on MARGARET BYRD RAWSON INSTITUTE INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Prentice Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Prentice Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

The Prentice Foundation Inc

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

381 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Prentice Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

The Prentice Foundation Inc

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

381 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Prentice Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph