· Private foundation
Cleveland H Dodge Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k231 grants · $375k
- $10k–50k52 grants · $922k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $843k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INTERNATIONAL HOUSE | $142,857 |
| TEACHERS COLLEGE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $125,000 |
| AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT | $100,000 |
| NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN | $100,000 |
| READWORKS INC | $75,000 |
| NEAR EAST FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| BANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION | $75,000 |
| TEACHING MATTERS INC | $50,000 |
| BRONX LACROSSE INC | $50,000 |
| THE CHILDRENS AID SOCIETY | $50,000 |
| LITERACY PARTNERS INC | $35,365 |
| YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK | $35,000 |
| UNDER 21 - COVENANT HOUSE NEW YORK | $35,000 |
| NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN | $25,000 |
| WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY | $25,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 89% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +36% since the first grant, against +26% for the ones you funded once.
251 repeat relationships — 162 still active in FY2024, 89 since wound down; 40 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $204k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AUAMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT6× · 2019–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +3%
- YMYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK6× · 2019–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +19%
BANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION6× · 2019–2024 · $820k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- CACHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY SOUTHERN PA DISTRICT - CHURCH OF THE BRETHRENgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $210k · revenue +107%
- PCPRESYTERIAN CHURCH OF CAPE CODone grant, 2023 · $34k
- TOTHE ORTHODOX PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHone grant, 2022 · $32k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Saint anselm is a catholic, benedictine college providing all of its students a distinctive liberal arts education that incorporates opportunities for professional and career preparation. it does so in a learning community that encourages…
Wilson college empowers students to be confident and critical thinkers, creative visionaries, effective communicators, honorable leaders, and agents of justice.
Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…
At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riverdale Neighborhood House Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Fragment Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 48 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
362 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 362 of the 466 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds BANK STREET COLLEGE OF EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds American Museum of Natural History ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds Teachers College Columbia University ↗
- Who funds WAVE HILL INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF GREATER NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL HOUSE ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds Wildlife Conservation Society ↗
- Who funds READWORKSINC ↗
- Who funds NEAR EAST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EAST HARLEM TUTORIAL PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S AID SOCIETY SOUTHERN PA DISTRICT - CHURCH OF THE BRETHREN ↗
- Who funds RIVERDALE NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE - BEIRUT ↗
- Who funds Madison Square Boys & Girls Club ↗
- Who funds THE ANTIQUE BOAT MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
- Who funds BRONX LACROSSE INC CO OTA ↗
- Who funds TEACHING MATTERS INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY INC ↗
- Who funds HERITAGE MUSEUMS AND GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds ORCHARD FRIENDS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds WESTPORT LAND CONSERVATION TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds THE WHITE MOUNTAIN SCHOOL ST MARY'S IN THE MOUNTAINS ↗
- Who funds BRIDGERCARE ↗
- Who funds SONOMA COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THE WILD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN CAIRO ↗
- Who funds THOUSAND ISLANDS LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN ALLEGHENIES MUSEUM OF ART ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The New York Community Trust · Maine Community Foundation Inc · Pinkerton Foundation · Davis Conservation Foundation · Fields Pond Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Ibm International Foundation · Wyoming Community Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Natrona Collective Health Trust · May and Samuel Rudin Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Cleveland H Dodge Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution — 63% of income from government
- Parks and People Inc — 43% of income from government
- Vermont Land Trust Inc — 42% of income from government
- Upper Valley Haven — 38% of income from government
- Connecticut Institute for Refugees and Immigrants Inc — 37% of income from government
- Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation — 16% of income from government
- Solomon Wright Public Library — 14% of income from government
- Vermont Foodbank — 13% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Cape Cod Young Men's Christian Association Inc — 11% of income from government
- Music On the Hill Inc — 3% of income from government
- Planned Parenthood of Northern New England Inc — 2% of income from government
- Springfield College — 1% of income from government
- New England Public Media Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wheaton College — 0% of income from government
- Pine Cobble School Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- Animal Rescue League of Boston — 0% of income from government
- Williams College — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Cleveland H Dodge Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Cleveland H Dodge Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.