· Private foundation
Natrona Collective Health Trust
OUR MISSION IS TO SUPPORT THE DELIVERY AND ACCESSIBILITY OF HIGH-QUALITY, EFFICIENT HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF RESIDENTS OF NATRONA COUNTY, WYOMING, AND THE OVERALL PHYSICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF RESIDENTS OF NATRONA COUNTY, WYOMING.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k22 grants · $98k
- $10k–50k42 grants · $904k
- $50k–250k34 grants · $2.9M
- $250k+3 grants · $9.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BANNER WYOMING MEDICAL CENTER | $8,752,370 |
| CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER OF NATRONA COUNTY | $560,000 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF NATRONA COUNTY | $261,100 |
| Individual grant recipient | $164,049 |
| CHILDRENS ADVOCACY PROJECT INC | $151,500 |
| CASPER HOUSING AUTHORITY CARES | $146,000 |
| CENTRAL WYOMING COUNSELING CENTER | $131,000 |
| WYOMING HOUSING NETWORK INC | $120,000 |
| IRIS CLUBHOUSE INC | $101,199 |
| MOTHER SETON HOUSING INC | $100,054 |
| NATRONA COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT #1 | $100,000 |
| UNACCOMPANIED STUDENTS INITIATIVE | $85,675 |
| MERCER FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC | $81,161 |
| CASPER CHILDRENS THEATER INC | $81,000 |
| 12-24 CLUB INC | $80,108 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $993k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +8% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
58 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 43 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.2M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WMWYOMING MEDICAL CENTER INC6× · 2017–2022 · $22M · revenue +12%
- CDChild Development Center of Natrona County2× · 2023–2024 · $647k · revenue +11%
- WCWYOMING CHILD & FAMILY DEVELOPMENT INC3× · 2022–2024 · $280k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- BHBANNER HEALTH FOUNDATION WYOMING MEDICAL CENTERone grant, 2021 · $305k
- EPE Plus Foundationone grant, 2017 · $277k
- PAPARENTS AS TEACHERSone grant, 2021 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
None
WYCRP is committed to supporting the safety, permanence, and well-being of children through systematic reviews, education, prevention, and early intervention efforts. As a federally mandated entity, the Citizen Review Panel evaluates the…
The Wyoming Nonprofit Network represents the collective voice of the Wyoming charitable nonprofit sector and brings best practices, resources, and support to the nonprofit community.
The mission of recover wyoming is to advocate for persons in recovery and mobilize resources to aid them, their families and allies, to increase the occurence and quality of long-term recovery from addiction. through recovery promotion and…
To improve and enhance rural health services and promote healthier individuals and communities in wyoming.
Help families and caregivers of those with Alzheimers and Dementia related illnesses care for their loved ones. Direct services provide: support, encouragement, access to community resources & techniques to help meet challenges of caring…
To provide professional counseling services related primarily to mental health and substance abuse to the residents of Carbon County, Wyoming.
The mission and purpose of the wyoming early childhood partnership is to lead a public-private partnership in the development of an accessible and sustainable, high quality, early childhood system that supports communities and families.
Focus on individual and family identified priorities and strengths and success. collaborate by including community partner supports and resources families choose themselves so people can thrive. support people where they are. empower them…
The wyoming donor alliance supports a network of statewide organizations focused on increasing civic participation.
The strengthen Wyoming communities by fostering a spirit of service and volunteerism among citizens of all ages and carry out a national service program as authorized by the National and Community Service Act of 1990.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Volunteers of America Northern Rockies and the most unlike its peers is E Plus Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 28% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
89 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 89 of the 141 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WYOMING MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Child Development Center of Natrona County ↗
- Who funds Childrens Advocacy Project ↗
- Who funds MERCER FAMILY RESOURCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNACCOMPANIED STUDENTS INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds WYOMING CHILD & FAMILY DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds Casper Family YMCA INC ↗
- Who funds THE SCIENCE ZONE ↗
- Who funds Self Help Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CLIMB DBA CLIMB WYOMING ↗
- Who funds 12-24 CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds CASPER PRIDE ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER OF CENTRAL WYOMING INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL WYOMING HOSPICE & TRANSITIONS ↗
- Who funds MOTHER SETON HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds CASPER FAMILY CONNECTIONS ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL WYOMING COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds Interfaith of Natrona County Inc ↗
- Who funds CASPER HOUSING AUTHORITY CARES ↗
- Who funds CASPER CHILDREN'S THEATRE ↗
- Who funds WYOMING HOUSING NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds Iris House Inc ↗
- Who funds YOUTH CRISIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE ↗
- Who funds GIRL SCOUTS OF MONTANA AND WYOMING ↗
- Who funds OLIVIA CALDWELL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Central Wyoming ↗
- Who funds CHILD DEVELOPMENT CENTER - REGION II INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Wyoming Community Foundation · The McMurry Foundation · United Way of Natrona County · Zimmerman Family Foundation · Wold Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Double 4 Foundation · Central Wyoming Chapter of the American Petroleum Institute · The John P Ellbogen Foundation · The Goodstein Foundation · Skelton Myra F Foundation · Blue Envelope Health Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Natrona Collective Health Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.