Skip to content

· Public charity

City of Albuquerque Foundation

The organization has been established for the benefit of, to perform the functions of, or to carry out the purposes of the city of albuquerque.

$636k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$528k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Public Benefit$1.8MCommunity Improvement$863kHuman Services$170kHealth$145kHousing & Shelter$141kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kFood & Nutrition$40kEducation$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $66k
  • $250k+1 grant · $528k
$66,358
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF NEW$528,166
CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE$66,358
THREE SISTERS KITCHEN$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 14%A NEW DAY INC: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 5 repeat orgs$621k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +116% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
20

Total granted

$2.7M
$581k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+116%
+14%

Still filing today

60%
35%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $40k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthCommunity ImprovementEducationRecreation & SportsHousing & ShelterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BC
    BLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF NEW MEXICO
    2× · 2021–2024 · $553k · revenue +213% · 99% of their budget
  • CL
    CUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC
    3× · 2021–2023 · $95k · revenue +116%
  • AP
    ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2023 · $24k · revenue +90%

Funded once

  • OF
    OHFI FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $150k
  • HH
    HEADING HOME
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +7%
  • FA
    FAITH AMERICAN LUTHERAN CHURCH
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership New Mexico

Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.

Arts & Culture
2
Alianza of New Mexico

Alianza's mission is to empower hard-to-reach, vulnerable, and underserved populations through education and supportive services aimed at working with everyone we serve to achieve better outcomes and higher quality of life.

Human Services
3
New Mexico Voices for Children

To improve the status, well-being and racial/ethnic equity of new mexicos children, families, and communities in the areas of health, education, and economic security by promoting public policies through credible research and effective…

Civil Rights
4
Community Power New Mexico
Community Improvement
5
University of New Mexico Alumni Association

The alumni association is a vital partner in the continued excellence of the university of new mexico through the significant engagement of alumni. the alumni association's mission is to serve as a bridge between alumni and the university…

Education
6
New Mexico Alliance of Health Councils

The mission of the new mexico alliance of health councils, as chartered in nm law and policy by hb 137, is: to improve the health of all new mexicans by supporting and strengthening county and tribal health councils, advocating for health…

Health
7
La Vida Felicidad Inc

Life quality of children and families, adults, and seniors, through advocacy and individualized services in collaboration with community partnerships.

—
8
Mi Casa Resource Center

Advancing economic prosperity of the latino community.

Human Services
9
Growing Up New Mexicoinc

The mission of growing up new mexico is to engage the whole community, bringing together people and resources to create increased opportunities for young children and the adults in their lives to achieve their dreams and aspirations.

Philanthropy
10
Cplc New Mexico Inc

Cplc new mexico, inc. is dedicated to improving the economic well-being and quality of life for low-income residents of northern new mexico, while seeking to preserve the area's unique cultural, historical and social traditions and way of…

Community Improvement
11
Unica

We empower and support our community by providing trauma-informed comprehensive care across the lifespan.

Human Services
12
Association of Chinese-American Engineers and Scientists of New Mexico
Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership for Community Action; the most unlike its peers is Alameda Little League Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
11/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF ALBUQUERQUE: $1,874,499 · OtherCITY OF ALBUQUERQUEOHFI FOUNDATION: $150,000 · OtherOHFI FOUNDATIONFAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES-HEALTH: $145,000 · OtherFAMILY & COMMUNITY SERVICES-HEALTH+14 more: $307,676 · Other+14 moreBLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF NEW MEXICO: $553,166 · Community ImprovementBLACK CHAMBER OF CO…+1 more: $10,000 · Community ImprovementCUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC: $95,000 · Human ServicesA NEW DAY INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesNEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER: $8,333 · Human ServicesHEADING HOME: $50,000 · Housing & ShelterTHE SAVILA COLLABORATIVE: $25,000 · HealthFIRST NATIONS COMMUNITY HEALTHSOURCE: $25,000 · HealthTHREE SISTERS KITCHEN: $40,000 · Food & NutritionALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $24,009 · Education
Other$2,477,175Community Improvement$563,166Human Services$128,333Housing & Shelter$50,000Health$50,000Food & Nutrition$40,000Education$24,009

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF NEW MEXICO: $553,166 over 2y, 99% of budgetCUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC: $95,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetHEADING HOME: $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHREE SISTERS KITCHEN: $40,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetTHE SAVILA COLLABORATIVE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetA NEW DAY INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetFIRST NATIONS COMMUNITY HEALTHSOURCE: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $24,009 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY ACTION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER: $8,333 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BLACK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF NEW MEXICO ↗
  • Who funds CUIDANDO LOS NIOS INC ↗
  • Who funds HEADING HOME ↗
  • Who funds THREE SISTERS KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds THE SAVILA COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds A NEW DAY INC ↗
  • Who funds FIRST NATIONS COMMUNITY HEALTHSOURCE ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR COMMUNITY ACTION ↗
  • Who funds NEW MEXICO IMMIGRANT LAW CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Alameda Little League Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community FoundationNM25.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Bob & Lamee Holscher Charitable Nka · Center for Educational Initiatives · New Mexico Community Trust · Thornburg Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization City of Albuquerque Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from City of Albuquerque Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to City of Albuquerque Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to City of Albuquerque Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on City of Albuquerque’s filings →

    More from the funding graph