· Private foundation
Center for Educational Initiatives
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k12 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $75k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES | $35,000 |
| MAYO CLINIC | $20,000 |
| FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH OF MCKINNEY TX | $10,000 |
| NM IMIGRANT LAW CENTER | $10,000 |
| ENCUENTRO | $5,000 |
| STANFORD UNIVERSITY | $5,000 |
| NM VETS FOR PETS | $5,000 |
| NM ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER | $5,000 |
| ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| THREE SISTERS KITCHEN | $5,000 |
| CENTER FOR INVESTIGATIVE REPORTING | $4,000 |
| NM CENTER ON LAW AND POVERTY | $4,000 |
| HORIZONS ALBUQUERQUE | $3,000 |
| HIGH COUNTRY NEWS | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 8% of Center for Educational Initiatives’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against +15% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $39k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- IFINSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES8× · 2017–2024 · $244k · revenue +14%
CENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC5× · 2017–2022 · $40k · revenue +537%- TSTHREE SISTERS KITCHEN5× · 2019–2024 · $22k · revenue +899%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2017 · $16k
- FBFIRST BAPTIST CHURCHone grant, 2019 · $15k
- TNTEATRO NUEVO MEXICO DBA AFROMUNDOone grant, 2022 · $7k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Strengthening new mexico by educating and connecting diverse leaders through experiential learning programs and activities.
To protect new mexico's water and acequias, grow healthy food for local families and communities, and to honor new mexico's cultural heritage.
Bold futures nm leads policy change, research, place-based organizing, and culture shift by and for women and people of color in new mexico. bold futures nm centers the lived experiences and expertise of those most impacted by an issue,…
Future focused education's mission is to co-create systems of equity to sustain healthier and more prosperous communities for those who need it the most. we envision schools as sites of innovation and opportunity, where young people become…
Uwncnm's mission is to connect people to opportunities and services to equitably improve lives and strengthen communities. that is done through direct service programs, community investment (grant making), community outreach (convening and…
The new mexico humanities council (nmhc) supports and conducts innovative and imaginative programs throughout the state that lead to a greater understanding of, and motivate interest in, the richness of our human experience and heritage.…
To cultivate enriching experiences for children and youth beyond the school day. vision: all children and youth in new mexico have access to high quality out-of-school time (ost) opportunities regardless of zip code and income. the new…
The alumni association is a vital partner in the continued excellence of the university of new mexico through the significant engagement of alumni. the alumni association's mission is to serve as a bridge between alumni and the university…
We demand health, dignity, and justice for our communities. We center and amplify Latine voices as we work to transform oppressive systems and narratives and to reclaim control over our bodies and lives. We build power by organizing our…
Aclu of nm foundation is the state affiliate of alcu, the nation's premier civil rights and civil liberties organization. our purpose is to protect and advance justice, liberty, and equity.
Groundworks new mexicos mission is to connect, strengthen, and advocate for new mexicos social sector while unleashing its full potential. our core values are racial equity, collaboration, community, and impact. groundworks new mexico…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership for Community Action and the most unlike its peers is Pnm Tnmp Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 6% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR POLICY STUDIES ↗
- Who funds CENTER OF SOUTHWEST CULTURE INC ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds THREE SISTERS KITCHEN ↗
- Who funds HIGH COUNTRY NEWS ↗
- Who funds ROADRUNNER FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR SOCIAL SUSTAINABLE SYSTEMS ↗
- Who funds Native Health Initiative ↗
- Who funds Southwest Educational Partners for Training ↗
- Who funds FAITH ROOTS REPRODUCTIVE ACTION ↗
- Who funds PROSPERITY WORKS ↗
- Who funds STOREHOUSE NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE HEALTH CARE FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
- Who funds International Media Project ↗
- Who funds PNM TNMP FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AFROMUNDO ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE MUSEUM FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds UNITED VOICES FOR NEWCOMER RIGHTS ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE INTERFAITH INC ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO VOICES FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds 516 Arts ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Santa Fe Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · Thornburg Foundation · The Simon Charitable Foundation · Lannan Foundation · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Center for Educational Initiatives funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Center for Educational Initiatives?
Find your warmest path to Center for Educational Initiatives through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.