· Private foundation
Catalina Marketing Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k93 grants · $129k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SCHOLARSHIP AMERICA | $20,000 |
| TO WRITE LOVE ON HER ARMS (TWLOHA) | $9,625 |
| CINCINNATI THERAPEUTIC RIDING HORSEMANSHIP | $5,000 |
| PINELLAS EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $5,000 |
| NORTH CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIVERSITY | $3,750 |
| FAMU FOUNDATION INC | $3,750 |
| TUSKEGEE UNIVERSITY | $3,750 |
| THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY | $3,750 |
| WHEELCHAIRS 4 KIDS | $3,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $3,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT | $3,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF TAMPA BAY | $3,000 |
| THE NO MORE FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER (NORTHWEST COOK COUNTY) | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +12% since the first grant, against +2% for the ones you funded once.
88 repeat relationships — 42 still active in FY2025, 46 since wound down; 39 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $56k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TITWLOHA INC4× · 2022–2025 · $21k · revenue +6%
- ECEckerd College2× · 2022–2023 · $10k · revenue +20%
Humane Society of Tampa Bay Inc4× · 2022–2025 · $9k · revenue +214%
Funded once
- SASCHOLARSHIP AMEIRCA INCone grant, 2024 · $26k
- FSFlorida Sheriffs Youth Ranchone grant, 2020 · $6k
- RMRONALD MCDONALD CHARITIES OF TBone grant, 2022 · $6k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…
Mission: together we advance the quality of life for people with disabilities. vision: people of all abilities thrive in the world. values: impact- generate solutions that make a difference. choice - create opportunities for people to lead…
Inspired by the gift of donation from our communities, allosource responsibly provides innovative cellular and tissue allografts to advance patient healing.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
The tampa bay partnership is a privately funded, ceo-driven regional advocacy organization, committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.
Central indiana corporate partnership (cicp) is an alliance of indiana's business and research university leaders coming together to foster long-term prosperity for the region. cicp's mission is to transform the economy of indiana in order…
See schedule onorc at the university of chicago conducts research and data science on critical societal issues to guide decision-making and the development of programs and public policy. our experts identify relationships and trends, and…
Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
We protect consumers of behavior analysis services by systematically establishing, promoting, and disseminating professional standards.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
People inc. provides health and human services that enrich lives and communities through innovation and supportive services. with a goal to help people achieve greater independence and quality of life, people inc. provides day,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Feed My Starving Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is East Orange Animal Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.4% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
237 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 237 of the 389 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PINELLAS COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds TWLOHA INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF PINELLAS INC ↗
- Who funds Eckerd College ↗
- Who funds Hillsborough Education Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Florida Agricultural & Mechanical Univ Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS TAMPA BAY FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds Humane Society of Tampa Bay Inc ↗
- Who funds PASCO EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Wheelchairs 4 Kids Inc ↗
- Who funds CINCINNATI THERAPEUTIC RIDING AND HORSEM HORSEMANSHIP ↗
- Who funds FRAMEWORKS OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds EQUALITY FLORIDA INSTITUTE INC ↗
- Who funds 1VOICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds Tuskegee University ↗
- Who funds Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc ↗
- Who funds Spelman College ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF SOUTHERN FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds TAMPA BAY WATCH INC ↗
- Who funds Owl's Nest Sanctuary for Wildlife Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds The LYN Fund Inc ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER OF NORTH & NORTHWEST COOK COUNTY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pinellas Community Foundation · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Rays Baseball Foundation Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Francis and Gertrude Levett Foundation · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · United Way Suncoast Inc · White Family Foundation · Dwayne Hawkins Family Foundation Inc D/B/A Crown Automotive Charities · The Spurlino Foundation · Westphal Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Catalina Marketing Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- The Spring of Tampa Bay Inc — 33% of income from government
- The No More Foundation — 33% of income from government
- Gulf Coast Jewish Family and Community Services Inc — 15% of income from government
- Champions for Children Inc — 14% of income from government
- Community Action Stops Abuse Inc — 13% of income from government
- Eckerd Youth Alternatives Inc — 12% of income from government
- National Center for Victims of Crime Inc — 10% of income from government
- The Crisis Center of Tampa Bay Inc — 6% of income from government
- Bethune-Cookman University — 6% of income from government
- Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
- Metropolitan Charities Inc — 4% of income from government
- Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
- Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Great Explorations Inc — 1% of income from government
- Eckerd College — 0% of income from government
- Friends of Hopewell Valley Open Space — 0% of income from government
- Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
- Southeastern Guide Dogs Inc — 0% of income from government
- The University of Tampa Incorporated — 0% of income from government
- Seaside Seabird Sanctuary — 0% of income from government
- The Kind Mouse Productions Inc — 0% of income from government
- Metropolitan Ministries Inc — 0% of income from government
- Pasco Education Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Junior Achievement of Tampa Bay Inc — 0% of income from government
- Children's Dream Fund Inc — 0% of income from government
- Creative Clay Inc — 0% of income from government
- K9S for Warriors Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Catalina Marketing Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Catalina Marketing Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.