How much did FRANCIS AND GERTRUDE LEVETT FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 66% of FRANCIS AND GERTRUDE LEVETT FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2019

sick childrenhousingmedical researchchildren carecounselingyouthmedical advancement

2020

religious advancementhungrygirls youngyoung womenwomen educationmedical researchabuse

2021

sheltercounselingfood needychildren educationeducation guidance

2022

education childrenplacing guideguide dogsdogs physicalphysical injuriesfood needycounseling

2023

transportationmedical equipmentupgradeseducationalacademicfacility educationlow-income

2024

purchase vehiclevehicle transporteducation enrichmentdevelopchildhood educationupgraderenovations

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 23 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k1 grant · $5k
$10k–50k4 grants · $112k
$50k–250k18 grants · $1.2M

$51,395

Median grant

States reached

$34M

Total assets

Largest grants

SALVADOR DALI MUSEUM INC$121,000
PARC CENTER FOR DISABILITIES$100,000
NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION$100,000
MENORAH LIFE$90,000
GREATER TAMPA BAY AREA COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA$85,000
YMCA OF GREATER ST PETERSBURG$83,333
GIVING FRIENDS$70,000
ST ANTHONY'S PRESCHOOL$69,797
ST PETERSBURG FREE CLINIC$65,000
R'CLUB CHILD CARE INC$57,375
TARPON SPRINGS SHEPHERD CENTER$52,000
VOLUNTEERS OF AMERICA OF FLORIDA INC$51,395
GREAT EXPLORATION INC$51,170
TAMPA BAY WATCH$50,000
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES TAMPA$50,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $619k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 11%. 98% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$4.1M · 32 repeat orgs$5.0M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$4.1M

$4.0M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%

+27%

Still filing today

63%

38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $955k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentAnimalsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

ST PETERSBURG FREE CLINIC
4× · 2018–2024 · $281k · revenue +113%
TB
TAMPA BAY WATCH
5× · 2018–2024 · $251k · revenue +62%
SR
STARTING RIGHT NOW
4× · 2018–2023 · $250k · revenue +12%

Funded once

PA
PEPIN ACADEMIES
one grant, 2022 · $274k · revenue +19%
FO
FRIENDS OF THE ISLAND PARKS
one grant, 2020 · $265k · revenue -52%
RW
R'CLUBHAPPY WORKER'S DAYCARE
one grant, 2018 · $150k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Hospice of the Florida Suncoast Inc

Provides health, human, & community services for the terminally ill and their families.

Human Services

Tampa Bay Partnership Inc

Committed to creating a unified, competitive and prosperous tampa bay.

—

Better Together Strengthening

Empowering people through better families and better jobs.

Human Services

The Arc Tampa Bay Foundation Inc

To secure the financial future of services for individuals served by the arc tampa bay, inc.

Human Services

Suncoast Partnership to End Homelessness

As lead agency for the sarasota/manatee continuum of care, suncoast partnership collaborates with providers of services and housing for those who are homeless and those at imminent risk of homelessness. we receive and distribute grants,…

Human Services

Lutheran Services Florida Inc

Lutheran services florida helps communities build healthier, happier, and hope-filled tomorrows by impacting the lives of 1 in 50 floridians through various services offered across the state.

Human Services

Suncoast Humane Societyinc

Our mission is to encourage, honor and support the human-animal bond in the suncoastregion of florida. our vision is to celebrate a community whose pets are safe andloved. suncoast humane society provides sheltering, prevention and…

Animals

Lighthouse Central Florida Inc

Charting a course for living, learning, and earning with vision loss.

Human Services

Goodwill Industries of Sw Florida Inc

Goodwill industries of southwest florida is committed to serving people with disabilities and disadvantages by offering life-changing opportunities to achieve independence.

Employment

The Florida Center for Early Childhood

The florida center supports the healthy development of young children, specializing in those with delays, disabilities or mental health challenges. our mission- "to help build and foster strong families and expand the potential of young…

Human Services

Boys & Girls Club of Pbc

The club is a voluntary organization which provides educational, athletic and social services to children and teens throughout palm beach county, florida.

Youth Development

Easter Seals South Florida Inc

Provide programs and services that support and strengthen families livingwith disability in miami dade and broward counties.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hospice Foundation of the Florida Suncoast Inc and the most unlike its peers is Eckerd College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/64

the rest of the field

12%

2,511/20,394

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

60 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

59/60

Grantees still filing

46/60

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$6,519,732Education$992,791Human Services$618,737Recreation & Sports$265,153Environment$251,000Health$246,630Arts & Culture$221,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of Tampa Bay IncFL66.1× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Pinellas Community Foundation · Rays Baseball Foundation Inc · Vinik Family Foundation · United Way Suncoast Inc · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · White Family Foundation · Copperhead Charities Inc · Alvah H & Wyline P Chapman Foundation · Top Jewish Foundation Inc · Duke Energy Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation FRANCIS AND GERTRUDE LEVETT FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

24get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: KIWANIS PEDIATRIC TRAUMA CENTER FOUNDATION INC.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~8 months of operating runway; revenue contracted over 4 filed years.

Track record & reputation

medium risk

4 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 113328062 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on KIWANIS PEDIATRIC TRAUMA CENTER FOUNDATION INC, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 8 months of cash on hand.
WatchSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue contracted over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 44% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Francis and Gertrude Levett Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Francis and Gertrude Levett Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

FRANCIS AND GERTRUDE LEVETT FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

60 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Francis and Gertrude Levett Foundation?

More from the funding graph

FRANCIS AND GERTRUDE LEVETT FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

60 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Francis and Gertrude Levett Foundation?

More from the funding graph