· Private foundation
The Spurlino Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k2 grants · $6k
- $10k–50k35 grants · $1.1M
- $50k–250k83 grants · $7.2M
- $250k+8 grants · $3.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES DIOCESE OF ST PE | $810,000 |
| ZOO TAMPA | $650,000 |
| TAMPA METROPOLITAN AREA YMCA | $500,000 |
| METROPOLITAN MINSTRIES | $400,000 |
| FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY | $300,000 |
| UNITED WAY SUNCOAST | $275,000 |
| AMERICAN RED CROSS | $250,000 |
| COMMUNITY CLOUD FOREST CONSERVATION | $250,000 |
| UNIVERSITY AREA COMMUNITY DEVELOPME | $200,000 |
| SAVE THE CHILDREN | $150,000 |
| CONSERVATION FLORIDA | $150,000 |
| BOYS GIRLS CLUBS OF TAMPA BAY | $150,000 |
| BOK TOWER GARDENS FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $150,000 |
| PARTNERS IN HEALTH | $150,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $7.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +52% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
138 repeat relationships — 120 still active in FY2022, 18 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $280k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TMTAMPA METROPOLITAN AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC4× · 2017–2022 · $3.0M · revenue +46%
METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC6× · 2017–2022 · $2.3M · revenue +131%- LPLowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc5× · 2017–2022 · $1.9M · revenue +102%
Funded once
- AAAMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ZOO VETERINone grant, 2020 · $40k
- GIGenYOUTH Incorporatedone grant, 2018 · $34k · revenue -20%
INTERNATIONAL PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION WESTERN HEMISPHERE REGIONone grant, 2019 · $25k · revenue -2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.
Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…
To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.
RA works at the intersection of business, agriculture & forests to improve lives & protect nature by transforming how land is used, production of goods & consumer choices.
To advocate for policy changes by governments and corporations in order to preserve ocean life and return the oceans to their former abundance.
In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…
To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.
Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.
Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.
The purpose of rainforest foundation us is to support indigenous peoples and forest communities in their efforts to secure their lands, protect their environment, and uphold their rights.
Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easter Seals Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.8% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
128 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 128 of the 157 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TAMPA METROPOLITAN AREA YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc ↗
- Who funds FEEDING AMERICA TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY SUNCOAST INC ↗
- Who funds THE CRISIS CENTER OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL FUND FOR ANIMAL WELFARE INC ↗
- Who funds ABE BROWN MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHAMPIONS FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE WORLD FOOD PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds THE SKILLS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds RAINFOREST TRUST ↗
- Who funds BEST FRIENDS ANIMAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds Florida Wildlife Corridor Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds TAMPA BAY PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds STARTING RIGHT NOW ↗
- Who funds ROOM TO READ ↗
- Who funds Hillsborough Education Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds WATER FOR PEOPLE ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds CONCERN WORLDWIDE (US) INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY AREA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION INC ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER GREATER FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Florida Aquarium Inc ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds THE SPRING OF TAMPA BAY INC ↗
- Who funds Humane World for Animals Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CLOUD FOREST CONSERVATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vinik Family Foundation · Community Foundation of Tampa Bay Inc · Suncoast Credit Union Foundation · Debartolo Family Foundation Inc · Pinellas Community Foundation · Rays Baseball Foundation Inc · United Way Suncoast Inc · New York Yankees Tampa Foundation Inc · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · The Saunders Foundation · Lightning Foundation · The Florida Medical Clinic Foundation of Caring Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Spurlino Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- University Area Community Development Corporation Inc — 100% of income from government
- North Florida Land Trust Inc — 81% of income from government
- Redlands Christian Migrant Association Inc — 51% of income from government
- Mercy Corps — 47% of income from government
- The Spring of Tampa Bay Inc — 33% of income from government
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Big Brothers Big Sisters of America — 21% of income from government
- Homeless Emergency Project Inc — 15% of income from government
- Champions for Children Inc — 14% of income from government
- Bay Area Legal Services Inc — 14% of income from government
- The Centre for Women Inc — 6% of income from government
- The Crisis Center of Tampa Bay Inc — 6% of income from government
- The Children's Home Society of Florida — 6% of income from government
- Tampa Metropolitan Area Young Men's Christian Association Inc — 4% of income from government
- Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
- Academy Prep Center of Tampa Inc — 3% of income from government
- Big Brothers Big Sisters of Tampa Bay Inc — 3% of income from government
- Feeding America Tampa Bay Inc — 2% of income from government
- United Way Suncoast Inc — 1% of income from government
- Dolphin Research Center Inc — 0% of income from government
- Lowry Park Zoological Society of Tampa Inc — 0% of income from government
- Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
- Metropolitan Ministries Inc — 0% of income from government
- Camelot Community Care Inc — 0% of income from government
- Bess the Book Bus Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Abe Brown Ministries Inc — 0% of income from government
- Cat Depot — 0% of income from government
- Oxfam-America Inc — 0% of income from government
- The Florida Aquarium Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Spurlino Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Spurlino Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.