Skip to content
Association of State and Territorial Health Officials at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

Association of State and Territorial Health Officials

To support, equip, and advocate for state and territorial health officials in their work of advancing the public's health and well-being.

$6.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
37
Grants FY2025still arriving
23
States reached
$806k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$29MPublic Safety & Disaster$9.9MEnvironment$2.9MScience & Tech$2.0MHuman Services$870kPublic Benefit$567kFood & Nutrition$558kPhilanthropy$124kOther$0
02FY2025 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k6 grants · $198k
  • $50k–250k22 grants · $3.0M
  • $250k+9 grants · $3.4M
$165,000
Median grant
23
States reached
$29M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHRONIC DISEASE DIRECTORS$806,262
NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTHY HOUSING INC$375,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL$365,000
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE$350,000
ORION HEATHCARE SERVICES INC DBA WANDERLY$341,626
WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH$327,841
NAT'L FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION$285,000
COMPTROLLER OF MARYLAND DBA MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH$250,000
STATE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH$250,000
GUIDEHOUSE INC$246,208
VA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH$224,999
CNMI COMMONWEALTH HEALTHCARE CORP$200,000
KENTUCKY DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH$197,493
NATIONAL NETWORK OF PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTES$188,878
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH$175,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 80% of grant dollars ($37M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 20% that went abroad ($9.2M) is mapped below.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $3.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN: $425k → 18%PALMETTO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHP: $425k → 12%COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM FOR CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $425k → 15%GRAND RAPIDS URBAN LEAGUE: $50k → 11%PICKENS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE AND CDC INC: $370k → 24%ENRICHMENT SERVICES PROGRAM: $415k → 18%INFORMED GREEN SOLUTIONS INC: $60k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN: $140k → 18%PALMETTO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $150k → 12%COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $150k → 15%GRAND RAPIDS URBAN LEAGUE: $50k → 11%PICKENS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE AND CDC INC: $40k → 24%ENRICHMENT SERVICES PROGRAM: $160k → 18%COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN: $105k → 18%PALMETTO COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $40k → 12%COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM FOR CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $100k → 15%PICKENS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE AND CDC INC: $205k → 24%ENRICHMENT SERVICES PROGRAM INC: $100k → 18%GLOBAL PERINATAL SERVICES: $50k → 9%COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM FOR CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $40k → 15%ENRICHMENT SERVICES PROGRAM INC: $40k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
HI
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

Beyond the US: 20% of all-years giving ($9.2M)

5 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Puerto Rico$8.5M · 4 grants
Guam$226k · 8 grants
Mauritius$213k · 5 grants
US Virgin Islands$179k · 6 grants
Bulgaria$88k · 1 grant
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 14% of Association of State and Territorial Health Officials’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

Association of State and Territorial Health Officialslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 24% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

85%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$40M · 94 repeat orgs$7.0M to everyone else

94 repeat relationships: 21 still active in FY2025, 73 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

94
52

Total granted

$40M
$3.8M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+6%
+14%

Still filing today

54%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementScience & TechEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RT
    Research Triangle Institute
    3× · 2021–2023 · $1.7M · revenue +16%
  • NA
    NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AND CITY HEALTH OFFICALS
    4× · 2021–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +85%
  • ES
    ENRICHMENT SERVICES PROGRAMINC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $715k · revenue +6%

Funded once

  • CA
    COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP
    one grant, 2023 · $641k · revenue -33%
  • NC
    NATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $281k · revenue +25%
  • PR
    PUERTO RICO DEPT OF HEALTH (EXECUSOURCE LLC)
    one grant, 2020 · $214k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association of State and Territorial Health Officials

To support, equip, and advocate for state and territorial health officials in their work of advancing the public's health and well-being.

Health
2
National Committee for Quality Assurance

Our mission: to improve the quality of health care.our vision: better health care. better choices. better health.

Health
3
American Public Health Association

To provide optimal, equitable health and well-being for all.

Health
4
Association of Academic Health Centers Inc

The association of academic health centers (aahc) seeks to improve the nation's health care system by mobilizing and enhancing the strengths and resources of the academic health center enterprise in health professions, education, patient…

—
5
Public Health Institute

Public health institute generates and promotes research, leadership and partnerships to build capacity for strong public health policy, programs, systems and practices.

Health
6
America's Health Insurance Plans Inc

Ahip is the national trade association representing the health insurance industry. ahip's members provide health care coverage, services and solutions to more than 200 million americans. we are committed to market-based solutions and…

Membership Benefit
7
National Nurse-Led Care Consortium

The national nurse-led care consortium (nncc) strives to advance nurse-led healthcare through policy, consultation, and programs to reduce health disparities and meet people's primary care and wellness needs.

Health
8
Arizona Hospital & Healthcare Association

Bringing together diverse voices to advance health and healthcare in arizona.

—
9
American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (Ashp)

The mission of pharmacists is to help people achieve optimal health outcomes. ashp helps its members achieve this mission by advocating and supporting the professional practice of pharmacists in hospitals, health systems, ambulatory care…

—
10
American Hospital Association

To advance the health of all individuals and communities. The AHA leads, represents and serves hospitals, health systems and other related organizations that are accountable to the community and committed to equitable care and health…

—
11
Altarum Institute

Altarum is focused on improving the health of individuals with fewer financial resources and populations disenfranchised by the health care system. we drive impactful changes in four domains: 1) transform health service delivery - we work…

Science & Tech
12
Virginia Hospital and Healthcare Association

Collaborating with our members and stakeholders, vhha works to ensure the sustainability of virginia's health care system and improve the health of all virginians.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Association of County and City Health Officals; the most unlike its peers is Mama Bird Doula Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

85 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 85 of the 164 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
84/85
Grantees still filing
48/85
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLORADO ENERGY OFFICE: $1,558,350 · OtherCOLORADO ENERGY OFFICENATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AND CITY HEALTH OFFICALS: $1,545,828 · OtherNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AND CITY HEALTH OF…UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK: $1,250,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARKTALUS ANALYTICS LLC (CDC): $1,247,032 · OtherTALUS ANALYTICS LLC (CDC)UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO: $773,855 · Other+102 more: $16,613,672 · Other+102 morePUERTO RICO SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH TRUST: $8,314,229 · Science & TechPUERTO RICO SCIENCE T…Research Triangle Institute: $1,693,575 · Science & TechResearch Triangle Ins…NATIONAL COALITION OF STD DIRECTORS: $1,043,045 · HealthNATIONAL COALITI…NATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH INFORMATION COALITION INC: $743,866 · HealthNATIONAL PUBLIC …Association of Immunization Managers: $697,916 · HealthAssociation of I…CIVITAS NETWORKS FOR HEALTH: $531,252 · HealthCIVITAS NETWORKS…WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH INFORMATION NETWORK INC: $509,038 · HealthWEST VIRGINIA HE…PACIFIC ISLAND HEALTH OFFICERS ASSOCIATION INC: $502,801 · HealthPACIFIC ISLAND H…HEALTH RESEARCH INC: $469,285 · HealthHEALTH RESEARCH …ACOG FOUNDATION: $454,166 · HealthACOG FOUNDATIONAmerican College of Preventive Medicine: $350,000 · HealthBIG CITIES HEALTH COALITION INC: $313,099 · HealthCOLORADO COMMUNITY MANAGED CARE NETWORK: $281,127 · Health+22 more: $1,648,915 · Health+22 morePresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,547,200 · EducationPresident and …AMERICAN IMMUNIZATION REGISTRY ASSOCIATION: $666,672 · EducationAMERICAN IMMUN…+8 more: $423,767 · Education+8 moreCOMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM FOR CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $715,000 · Human ServicesENRICHMENT SERVICES PROGRAMINC: $715,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN: $670,000 · Human ServicesCHARLESTON COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION INC: $615,000 · Human ServicesPICKENS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE & CDC INC: $615,000 · Human ServicesGUAMS ALTERNATIVE LIFESTYLE ASSOCIATION: $369,484 · Human Services+3 more: $210,001 · Human ServicesNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHRONIC DISEASE DIRECTORS: $806,262 · Crime & LegalHealthy Schools Campaign: $480,000 · EnvironmentASSOCIATION OF STATE DRINKING WATER ADMINISTRATORS: $30,000 · Environment
Other$22,988,737Science & Tech$10,007,804Health$7,544,510Education$6,637,639Human Services$3,909,485Crime & Legal$806,262Environment$510,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPUERTO RICO SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH TRUST: $8,314,229 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $5,547,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetResearch Triangle Institute: $1,693,575 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AND CITY HEALTH OFFICALS: $1,545,828 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetNATIONAL COALITION OF STD DIRECTORS: $1,043,045 over 3y, 17% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHRONIC DISEASE DIRECTORS: $806,262 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetNATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH INFORMATION COALITION INC: $743,866 over 5y, 30% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM FOR CENTRAL ARKANSAS: $715,000 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetENRICHMENT SERVICES PROGRAMINC: $715,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetAssociation of Immunization Managers: $697,916 over 4y, 5.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN: $670,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN IMMUNIZATION REGISTRY ASSOCIATION: $666,672 over 3y, 3.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP: $640,530 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetCHARLESTON COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION INC: $615,000 over 3y, 3.2% of budgetPICKENS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE & CDC INC: $615,000 over 3y, 7.2% of budgetCIVITAS NETWORKS FOR HEALTH: $531,252 over 3y, 12% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA HEALTH INFORMATION NETWORK INC: $509,038 over 2y, 8.5% of budgetPACIFIC ISLAND HEALTH OFFICERS ASSOCIATION INC: $502,801 over 4y, 9.1% of budgetNational Center for Healthy Housing Inc: $485,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetHealthy Schools Campaign: $480,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetHEALTH RESEARCH INC: $469,285 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetACOG FOUNDATION: $454,166 over 5y, 1.8% of budgetGUAMS ALTERNATIVE LIFESTYLE ASSOCIATION: $369,484 over 9y, 17% of budgetBIG CITIES HEALTH COALITION INC: $313,099 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetHEALTH RESOURCES IN ACTION INC: $299,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION INC: $285,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCOLORADO COMMUNITY MANAGED CARE NETWORK: $281,127 over 2y, 4.8% of budgetNATIONAL COMMUNITY ACTION FOUNDATION INC: $280,620 over 1y, 22% of budgetThe Research & Educational Foundation of the Ohio Hospital Association: $214,909 over 2y, 25% of budgetAMERICAN COLLEGE OF NURSE-MIDWIVES: $204,999 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetOHIO HEALTH INFORMATION PARTNERSHIP INC: $192,368 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetNATIONAL NETWORK OF PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTES INC: $188,878 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF STATE OFFICES OF MINORITY HEALTH: $187,500 over 2y, 91% of budgetNATIONAL HISPANIC MEDICAL ASSOCIATION: $176,729 over 3y, 3.6% of budgetBLUE RIDGE EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES COUNCIL INC: $150,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetThe George Washington University: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI: $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF MATERNAL AND CHILD HEALTH PROGRAMS: $145,997 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCIVITAS NETWORKS FOR HEALTH ASSOCIATION: $145,830 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH INSTITUTES INC: $144,620 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetPUBLIC HEALTH FOUNDATION ENTERPRISES INC: $130,625 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFINN CHURCH AID AMERICAS INC: $124,280 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN INDIAN PHYSICIANS INC: $120,500 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetIllinois Public Health Institute: $115,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetPublic Health Management Corporation: $112,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION OF PUBLIC HEALTH LABORATORIES INC: $101,585 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGRAND RAPIDS URBAN LEAGUE: $100,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetWORLD INSTITUTE ON DISABILITY: $100,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PUERTO RICO SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY AND RESEARCH TRUST ↗
  • Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
  • Who funds Research Triangle Institute ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY AND CITY HEALTH OFFICALS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL COALITION OF STD DIRECTORS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHRONIC DISEASE DIRECTORS ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL PUBLIC HEALTH INFORMATION COALITION INC ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PROGRAM FOR CENTRAL ARKANSAS ↗
  • Who funds ENRICHMENT SERVICES PROGRAMINC ↗
  • Who funds Association of Immunization Managers ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF KERN ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN IMMUNIZATION REGISTRY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP ↗
  • Who funds CHARLESTON COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds PICKENS COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION COMMITTEE & CDC INC ↗
  • Who funds CIVITAS NETWORKS FOR HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA HEALTH INFORMATION NETWORK INC ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC ISLAND HEALTH OFFICERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds National Center for Healthy Housing Inc ↗
  • Who funds Healthy Schools Campaign ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH RESEARCH INC ↗
  • Who funds ACOG FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GUAMS ALTERNATIVE LIFESTYLE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds American College of Preventive Medicine ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Council of State and …Association of Public…Association of Matern…Investor Protection T…North American Associ…National Foundation f…The Pew Charitable Tr…National Network of P…American Bar Associat…Recreational Boating …National Fish and Wil…Yale University
Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists IncGA67.3× affinity30 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists Inc · Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc · Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs · Investor Protection Trust · North American Association of Central Cancer Registries · National Foundation for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Inc · The Pew Charitable Trusts · National Network of Public Health Institutes Inc · American Bar Association · Recreational Boating and Fishing Foundation · National Fish and Wildlife Foundation · Yale University

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Association of State and Territorial Health Officials funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Association of State and Territorial Health Officials. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 20%
  • Big Cities Health Coalition Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Informed Green Solutions Inc: 100% of income from government
  • Association of Immunization Managers: 52% of income from government
  • Health Resources in Action Inc: 39% of income from government
  • National Center for Healthy Housing Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Medical Society of Delaware: 20% of income from government
  • Brandeis University: 9% of income from government
  • President and Fellows of Harvard College: 7% of income from government
  • Sky Lakes Medical Center Foundation: 2% of income from government
  • The University of Vermont Medical Center: 1% of income from government
  • Association of Public Health Laboratories Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
15report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
3rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 164 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Association of State and Territorial Health Officials’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home