· Public charity
American Academy of Pediatrics
The mission of the AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS is to obtain optimal physical, mental and social health for all infants, children, adolescents, and young adults.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 82 grants below total $1,868,165 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,224,671 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $356,506 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $73k
- $10k–50k65 grants · $1.3M
- $50k–250k7 grants · $483k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Puerto Rico Chapter - AAP | $127,327 |
| Florida Chapter - AAP | $70,850 |
| Colorado Chapter - AAP | $63,263 |
| Arizona Chapter - AAP | $59,400 |
| Washington Chapter - AAP | $56,929 |
| Texas Pediatric Society | $53,000 |
| Arkansas Chapter - AAP | $52,319 |
| New York Chapter I - AAP | $49,500 |
| Pennsylvania Chapter - AAP | $45,000 |
| California Chapter II - AAP | $45,000 |
| Northwestern University | $43,750 |
| Childrens Hospital of Philadelphia | $41,900 |
| Maryland Chapter - AAP | $39,040 |
| Nationwide Children's Hospital | $35,020 |
| Ohio Chapter AAP | $34,900 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $644k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $232k on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 4 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: IKMC Town Hall; Suicide Prevention · Early Childhood Development · ICATCH
Stated purpose: ICATCH
Stated purpose: support a developmental surveillance training for Indonesian pediatricians
Stated purpose: Disaster Relief
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
155 repeat relationships — 59 still active in FY2025, 96 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $232k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACARIZONA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS9× · 2017–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +46%
- FCFLORIDA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY PEDIATRICS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $668k · revenue +15%
- TPTEXAS PEDIATRIC SOCIETY CHAPTER OF AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS9× · 2017–2025 · $520k · revenue +169%
Funded once
- PEPEDIATRIC EDUCATION FOUNDATION OF VIRGINIA INCone grant, 2020 · $62k · revenue -100% · 51% of their budget
- PFPEDIATRIC FOUNDATION OF GEORGIA INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $53k · revenue ×16
- TCTHE COOPER HEALTH SYSTEM A NEW JERSEY NON-PROFIT CORPORATIONgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $53k · revenue +63%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the american academy of pediatrics is to obtain optimal physical, mental and social health for all infants, children, adolescents, and young adults. the academy seeks to promote this goal by encouraging and assisting its…
The mission of the american college of physicians (acp), www. acponline.org, is to enhance the quality and effectiveness of health care by fostering excellence and professionalism in the practice of medicine. acp was founded in 1915 to…
University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…
We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.
The American Board of Pediatrics (ABP) certifies general pediatricians and pediatric subspecialists based on standards of excellence that lead to high quality health care for infants, children, and adolescents. ABP certification provides…
Knowing that every child's life is sacred, our promise is to improve the health of every child in our region through the prevention and treatment of illness, disease, and injury.
The corporation is organized for charitable, educational and scientific purposes, and to provide healthcare services of pediatric specialty physicians and other personnel to the patients of johns hopkins all children's hospital and…
East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…
Advancing medicine through excellence in the science, education and professional practice of medical physics. the mission is carried out through driving scientific and clinical innovation in medical physics to improve human health,…
The association defends member podiatric physicians and surgeons' ability to practice to the full extent of their education and training to best serve public health.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Pediatric healthcare, education & research
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ohio Chapter American Academy of Pediatrics and the most unlike its peers is Kidsmates Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
251 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 251 of the 359 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ARIZONA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY PEDIATRICS INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS PEDIATRIC SOCIETY CHAPTER OF AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗
- Who funds THE GEORGIA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗
- Who funds Illinois Chapter of American Academy of Pediatrics ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗
- Who funds COLORADO CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗
- Who funds ARKANSAS CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Montana Academy of Pediatric Physicians Inc ↗
- Who funds American Academy of Pediatrics District of Columbia Chapter ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS PENNSYLVANIA CHAPTER ↗
- Who funds OREGON PEDIATRIC SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds LOUISIANA CHAPTER AMERICAN ACADEMY PEDIATRICS ↗
- Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
- Who funds INDIANA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS INC ↗
- Who funds KANSAS CHAPTER AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS INC ↗
- Who funds Maryland Chapter of the American Academy of Pediatrics ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY CHAPTER AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS DISTRIC IX CHATER IV ↗
- Who funds KENTUCKY PEDIATRIC SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS MAINE CHAPTER INC ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds American Academy of Pediatrics New York Chapter 2 Inc ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA CHAPTER AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS CALIFORNIA CHAPTER 3 ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS FOUNDATI ↗
- Who funds NORTH CAROLINA PEDIATRIC SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA CHAPTER 1 AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS DISTRICT IX CHAPTER 2 ↗
- Who funds SOUTH CAROLINA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗
- Who funds IOWA CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗
- Who funds American Academy Of Pediatrics NY Chapte ↗
- Who funds American Academy of Pediatrics Hawaii Chapter Inc ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS RI ↗
- Who funds Prisma Health-Upstate ↗
- Who funds MISSISSIPPI CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF PEDIATRICS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · American Cancer Society Inc · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · America's Health Insurance Plans Inc · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · The Children's Oncology Group Foundation Inc · American Heart Association Inc · Public Health Institute · St Baldrick's Foundation Inc · Reach Out and Read Inc · Food Research & Action Center · Mayo Clinic
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization American Academy of Pediatrics funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Oregon Pediatric Society — 58% of income from government
- Lift Community Action Agency Inc — 43% of income from government
- Garrett County Maryland Community Action Committee — 32% of income from government
- New Jersey Chapter American Academy of Pediatrics Inc — 24% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Autism Society of America Inc — 8% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Oregon Health & Science University Foundation — 1% of income from government
- The Nemours Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Yale New Haven Hospital — 0% of income from government
- The Cooper Health System a New Jersey Non-Profit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Asante — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.