· Public charity
St Baldrick's Foundation Inc
The st.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k4 grants · $133k
- $50k–250k35 grants · $3.4M
- $250k+16 grants · $12M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| THE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION | $3,310,713 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $1,292,044 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO | $1,072,500 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $1,068,135 |
| RESEARCH INSTITUTE AT NATIONWIDE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $955,896 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC | $660,000 |
| NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | $526,822 |
| SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $525,000 |
| MELANOMA RESEARCH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION | $450,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES | $407,500 |
| UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI MEDICAL CENTER | $335,000 |
| MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA | $334,991 |
| WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY | $334,934 |
| TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY | $330,000 |
| THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER | $330,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–21, $31k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.
112 repeat relationships — 50 still active in FY2025, 62 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.4M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $38M · revenue +12% · 65% of their budget
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA9× · 2017–2025 · $7.9M · revenue +88%
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $7.0M · revenue +132%
Funded once
- PHPrisma Health-Midlandsone grant, 2023 · $330k · revenue +11%
- ROREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEYone grant, 2018 · $324k
- MGMASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATEDone grant, 2022 · $220k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…
University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…
Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service
Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o
Our mission at the university of chicago medicine is to provide superior health care through rigorous research, innovative education, and comprehensive care and healing. in partnership with our colleagues, we pursue life-changing…
Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.
Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.
As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…
University health is an academic health center providing accessible, state-of-the-art quality healthcare to our community regardless of the ability to pay.
THE MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY ("THE INFIRMARY") IS A NOT-FOR-PROFIT TEACHING HOSPITAL CONDUCTING PATIENT CARE AND RESEARCH. THE INFIRMARY IS A TEACHING HOSPITAL OF HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL AND AN INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR RESEARCH.…
We, loyola university health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities.lumc is a member of loyola university health system and trinity…
Northwestern memorial healthcare is an integrated healthcare system, consisting of multiple hospitals (including northwestern memorial hospital, an academic medical center) and networks of physicians and healthcare professionals, where the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Montefiore Medical Center and the most unlike its peers is Foundation for the National Institutes of Health Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
100 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 100 of the 163 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S ONCOLOGY GROUP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds Baylor College of Medicine ↗
- Who funds University of Chicago ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds KEATON'S CHILD CANCER ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK MEDICAL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MARROW DONOR PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds SEATTLE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds The Research Foundation for The State University of New York ↗
- Who funds NORTHERN NEVADA CHILDREN'S CANCER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Cystic Fibrosis Foundation · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · The Children's Oncology Group Foundation Inc · Public Health Institute · American Heart Association Inc · American Cancer Society Inc · Hyundai Hope on Wheels · American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network Inc · Gamers Outreach Foundation Inc · Muscular Dystrophy Association Inc · Alexs Lemonade Stand Foundation · Mayo Clinic
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization St Baldrick's Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Childrens Cancer Therapy Development Institute — 44% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Connecticut Children's Medical Center — 5% of income from government
- The Nemours Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Orlando Health Inc — 0% of income from government
- St Joseph's Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.