Skip to content
Plinth

· Public charity

Alpha Chi Omega Foundation Inc

Through the real.strong.women.

$3.8M
Granted FY2025still arriving
63
Grants FY2025still arriving
28
States reached
$1.1M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Membership Benefit$7.3MHousing & Shelter$6.3MHuman Services$5.2MEducation$826kCrime & Legal$824kHealth$428kRecreation & Sports$113kReligion$42kOther$0
02FY2025 · 63 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 63 grants below total $3,128,618 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,842,130 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $713,512 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $118k
  • $10k–50k40 grants · $860k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $369k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.8M
$16,665
Median grant
28
States reached
$36M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALPHA CHI OMEGA NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION$1,073,991
ALPHA CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY INC$707,889
GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT$87,312
WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY$85,156
ALPHA CHI OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION FOR PSI CHAPTER$77,828
PHOEBE'S HOME$68,048
WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY$50,344
REFUGE HOUSE INC$48,676
SISTERCARE$48,137
THE SAFE ALLIANCE$39,018
EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE$31,604
YWCA KNOXVILLE AND THE TENNESSEE VALLEY$31,428
TURNING POINT$30,574
ROSE BROOKS CENTER$30,352
FAMILY ABUSE CENTER$29,603
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $36k → 15%EMPOWER YOLO: $17k → 16%STILLWATER DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES (DBA WINGS OF HOPE FAMILY CRISIS SERV: $27k → 19%PEACEFUL PATHS INC: $23k → 19%DVIC: $23k → 32%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES (DAIS): $32k → 10%YWCA KNOXVILLE AND THE TENNESSEE VALLEY: $31k → 12%SAFE ALLIANCE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER: $23k → 10%BOULDER SAFEHOUSE (SAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE): $29k → 12%SAFEHOUSE DENVER: $31k → 12%MIDDLE WAY HOUSE: $27k → 18%LSS CHOICES: $18k → 15%DOMESTIC ABUSE RESISTANCE TEAM (DART): $25k → 32%IOTA SIGMA CHAPTER OF ALPHA CHI OMEGA: $68k → 19%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $34k → 15%GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT: $109k → 14%PEACEFUL PATHS INC: $17k → 19%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES (DAIS): $28k → 10%YWCA KNOXVILLE AND THE TENNESSEE VALLEY: $27k → 12%SAFE ALLIANCE: $18k → 10%SAFEHOUSE DENVER: $29k → 12%DOMESTIC ABUSE RESISTANCE TEAM (DART): $23k → 32%SOJOURN: $23k → 14%GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT: $103k → 14%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES (DAIS): $23k → 10%YWCA KNOXVILLE AND THE TENNESSEE VALLEY: $19k → 12%SAFE ALLIANCE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER: $18k → 10%SAFEHOUSE DENVER: $28k → 12%DOMESTIC ABUSE RESISTANCE TEAM: $18k → 32%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $36k → 15%SOJOURN: $20k → 14%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES (DAIS): $21k → 10%SAFEHOUSE DENVER: $28k → 12%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $32k → 15%LAURA'S HOUSE: $22k → 10%SAFE HAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $21k → 11%AVDA (AID TO VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC ABUSE): $17k → 16%DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES: $19k → 10%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $24k → 15%LAURA'S HOUSE: $21k → 10%EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE: $23k → 15%LAURA'S HOUSE: $18k → 10%SAFE HAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $18k → 11%GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT: $31k → 14%YWCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY - BECKY'S HOUSE: $19k → 11%GENESIS WOMEN'S SHELTER & SUPPORT: $87k → 14%YWCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY - BECKY'S HOUSE: $19k → 11%Safe Haven of Tarrant County: $51k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
IA
IN
OH
PA
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
MO
KY
VA
MD
AZ
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$21M · 87 repeat orgs$365k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

87 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

87
18

Total granted

$21M
$299k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
0%

Still filing today

94%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterCrime & LegalEducationRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AC
    ALPHA CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $7.3M · revenue +81%
  • AC
    ALPHA CHI OMEGA NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION
    6× · 2020–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +133%
  • TW
    THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $849k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • AC
    Alpha Chi Omega House Corporation for Beta Epsilon Chapter
    one grant, 2024 · $79k · revenue -63% · 47% of their budget
  • S
    SOJOURN
    one grant, 2018 · $42k
  • AC
    ALPHA CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY INC
    one grant, 2019 · $32k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
2
Womens Aid in Crisis Inc

Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.

Human Services
3
Capital Area Family Violence Intervention Center Inc

To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…

Human Services
4
S a F E Shelter

We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

5
Domestic Violence Project

The mission of SafeHouse Center is to empower survivors of both sexual and intimate partner violence by providing advocacy, support, and promoting social change within our community.

Human Services
6
Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

7
Domestic Violence Sexual Assault Center Inc

Our mission is to provide compassionate support, resources, and advocacy for victims of violent crime. we are dedicated to empowering children, teens and adults in their journey to healing by offering a safe place, emotional care, and the…

Human Services
8
Every Woman's Place Inc

Provides comprehensive services that include emergency shelter, counseling, and advocacy for victims and survivors of domestic violence, sexual assault, and sex trafficking.

Human Services
9
Women's Aid Service Inc

To provide safety and empowerment to victims of domestic violence and sexual assault and to work to eliminate sexual victimization and domestic violence through shelter, treatment, education and social change.

Crime & Legal
10
Dove House Advocacy Services

With wrap-around services, dove house seeks to address the needs of victimes of domestic violence, sexual assaultm and general crime in jefferson county as they navigate the many systems required to move from being victims to surviving and…

11
Safe of Columbia County

Domestic and sexual violence intervention, support, and education.

12
Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Domestic Violence Resource Center of South County Inc and the most unlike its peers is Gamma Rho Chapter of Alpha Chi Omega House Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyDomestic Violence ServicesCommunity FoundationsSenior Support ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Affordable Housing Developm…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 47 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number19%0%<5yr13%4%5–10yr18%4%10–20yr14%17%20–35yr13%55%35–55yr23%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value19%0%<5yr13%2%5–10yr18%1%10–20yr14%20%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr23%53%55yr+

The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/112
the rest of the field
10%
4,324/41,883

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

104 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 104 of the 112 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
21
Early backer (in before they grew)
103/104
Grantees still filing
70/104
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ALPHA CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY INC — $7,263,844 · OtherALPHA CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY INCALPHA CHI OMEGA NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION — $2,976,496 · OtherALPHA CHI OMEGA NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATIONALPHA CHI OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION FOR PSI CHAPTER — $1,147,067 · OtherALPHA CHI OMEGA HOUSE CORPORATION FOR PSI CHAPTERALPHA CHI OMEGA PSI CHAPTER HOUSE CORPORATION — $716,992 · Other+36 more — $3,269,775 · Other+36 moreGENESIS WOMENS SHELTER & SUPPORT — $330,399 · Human ServicesGENESIS WOMENS SHEL…WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY INC — $284,369 · Human ServicesWOMEN'S RESOURCE CE…REFUGE HOUSE INC — $203,793 · Human ServicesREFUGE HOUSE INCTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE — $195,680 · Human ServicesTUCSON CENTERS FOR …WOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES — $167,100 · Human ServicesGREENHOUSE17 INC — $136,932 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY — $136,911 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC — $134,304 · Human ServicesSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC — $127,495 · Human Services+42 more — $1,824,122 · Human Services+42 moreTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC — $849,447 · HealthBHcare Inc — $159,505 · HealthCENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS — $130,014 · HealthA NEW LEAF — $128,386 · HealthSAAFE HOUSE — $87,913 · HealthASSAULT CARE CENTER EXTENDING SHELTER AN — $58,051 · Health+2 more — $19,389 · HealthNorthwest Alpha Chi Omega Inc — $167,200 · Recreation & SportsAlpha Chi Omega House Corporation for Beta Xi Chapter — $49,314 · Recreation & SportsTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC — $122,862 · EducationALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC — $60,669 · EducationFAMILY CRISIS SERVICES OF NW MS — $20,853 · EducationTUSCALOOSA SAFE CENTERINC — $73,231 · Crime & LegalUTAH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ADVISORY COUNCIL — $69,931 · Crime & LegalRiverside County Coalition for Alternatives to Domestic Violence — $7,677 · Crime & LegalCOMMITTEE AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE INC — $6,022 · Crime & LegalWOMEN'S ADVOCATES INC — $56,584 · Housing & ShelterWINGS PROGRAM INC — $50,841 · Housing & ShelterCOURAGE CONNECTION — $21,164 · Housing & ShelterA Lotta Love Inc — $17,341 · Housing & Shelter
Other$15,374,174Human Services$3,541,105Health$1,432,705Recreation & Sports$216,514Education$204,384Crime & Legal$156,861Housing & Shelter$145,930

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetALPHA CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY INC — $7,263,844 over 9y, 7.4% of budgetALPHA CHI OMEGA NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION — $2,976,496 over 6y, 7.6% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC — $849,447 over 9y, 2.3% of budgetALPHA CHI OMEGA PSI CHAPTER HOUSE CORPORATION — $716,992 over 3y, 45% of budgetAUSTIN STREET CENTER — $384,482 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTwin City Mission — $357,825 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetGENESIS WOMENS SHELTER & SUPPORT — $330,399 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetWOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY INC — $284,369 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE — $269,486 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetGamma Rho Chapter of Alpha Chi Omega House Corporation — $205,302 over 2y, 34% of budgetREFUGE HOUSE INC — $203,793 over 8y, 1.3% of budgetTUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE — $195,680 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetSAN INC DBA TURNING POINT — $178,771 over 6y, 4.2% of budgetALPHA CHI OMEGA HOME INC — $177,861 over 4y, 26% of budgetSISTERCARE INC — $175,526 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetPROJECT SAFE INC — $172,858 over 9y, 1.8% of budgetNorthwest Alpha Chi Omega Inc — $167,200 over 3y, 20% of budgetWOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES — $167,100 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetBHcare Inc — $159,505 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetGREENHOUSE17 INC — $136,932 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY — $136,911 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetDOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC — $134,304 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS — $130,014 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetA NEW LEAF — $128,386 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC — $127,495 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTHE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC — $122,862 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetSafe Alliance Inc — $116,561 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetROSE BROOKS CENTER INC — $110,997 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetDART (DOMESTIC ABUSE RESISTANCE TEAM) — $110,058 over 6y, 1.9% of budgetLAURA'S HOUSE — $103,256 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetTHE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC — $100,526 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTHE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $95,705 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetSAAFE HOUSE — $87,913 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetYWCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY — $79,451 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetAlpha Chi Omega House Corporation for Beta Epsilon Chapter — $78,574 over 1y, 47% of budgetDOMESTIC ABUSE FAMILY SHELTER INC — $78,008 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $74,266 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTUSCALOOSA SAFE CENTERINC — $73,231 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetTHE JULIAN CENTER INC — $72,393 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetUTAH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ADVISORY COUNCIL — $69,931 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetA BETTER WAY SERVICES INC — $65,923 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetSAFE HARBOR INC — $62,967 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetSAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC — $61,991 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetMIDDLE WAY HOUSE INC — $61,477 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetEmpower Yolo Inc — $61,258 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetALPHA CHI OMEGA FOUNDATION INC — $60,669 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetNEW YORK ASIAN WOMEN'S CENTER INC — $60,606 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetASSAULT CARE CENTER EXTENDING SHELTER AN — $58,051 over 7y, 0.8% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ALPHA CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY INC
  • Who funds ALPHA CHI OMEGA NATIONAL HOUSING CORPORATION
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER OF TARRANT COUNTY INC
  • Who funds ALPHA CHI OMEGA PSI CHAPTER HOUSE CORPORATION
  • Who funds GAMMA RHO CHAPTER OF ALPHA CHI OMEGA FRATERNITY INC
  • Who funds AUSTIN STREET CENTER
  • Who funds Twin City Mission
  • Who funds GENESIS WOMENS SHELTER & SUPPORT
  • Who funds WOMEN'S RESOURCE CENTER OF THE NEW RIVER VALLEY INC
  • Who funds THE SAFE ALLIANCE
  • Who funds Gamma Rho Chapter of Alpha Chi Omega House Corporation
  • Who funds REFUGE HOUSE INC
  • Who funds TUCSON CENTERS FOR WOMEN & CHILDREN INC DBA EMERGE CENTER AGAINST DOMESTIC ABUSE
  • Who funds SAN INC DBA TURNING POINT
  • Who funds ALPHA CHI OMEGA HOME INC
  • Who funds SISTERCARE INC
  • Who funds PROJECT SAFE INC
  • Who funds Northwest Alpha Chi Omega Inc
  • Who funds WOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES
  • Who funds BHcare Inc
  • Who funds GREENHOUSE17 INC
  • Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY
  • Who funds DOMESTIC ABUSE INTERVENTION SERVICES INC
  • Who funds CENTER FOR COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS
  • Who funds A NEW LEAF
  • Who funds SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC
  • Who funds THE ONE LOVE FOUNDATION IN HONOR OF YEARDLEY LOVE INC
  • Who funds Safe Alliance Inc
  • Who funds ROSE BROOKS CENTER INC
  • Who funds DART (DOMESTIC ABUSE RESISTANCE TEAM)
  • Who funds LAURA'S HOUSE
  • Who funds THE HOUSE OF RUTH MARYLAND INC
  • Who funds THE YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds SAAFE HOUSE
  • Who funds YWCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY
  • Who funds Alpha Chi Omega House Corporation for Beta Epsilon Chapter
  • Who funds DOMESTIC ABUSE FAMILY SHELTER INC
  • Who funds THE PEOPLE CONCERN
  • Who funds TUSCALOOSA SAFE CENTERINC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mary Kay Ash FoundationTX70.5× affinity34 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mary Kay Ash Foundation · United Animal Nations Dba Redrover · Texas Council on Family Violence Inc · The Allstate Foundation · Astros Foundation · Indiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc · Florida Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc · Grapevine giving foundation · Women's Foundation of California · Everytown for Gun Safety Support Fund Inc · The Gap Foundation · California Physicians' Service Fdn Dba Blue Shield of California Fdn

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alpha Chi Omega Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 25%
  • BHcare Inc68% of income from government
  • Peaceful Paths Inc39% of income from government
  • Favorhouse of Northwest Florida Inc25% of income from government
  • The House of Ruth Maryland Inc19% of income from government
  • Refuge House Inc10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
47report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Alpha Chi Omega Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to Alpha Chi Omega Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 112 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph