· Public charity
Grapevine giving foundation
Through the activities described above, Grapevine giving foundation will help people make more of a difference together with products and services that support collective impact accross the arts, education, community, environment and more.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2022–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 537 grants below total $5,341,948 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $8,102,321 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,760,373 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k341 grants · $2.4M
- $10k–50k193 grants · $2.7M
- $50k–250k3 grants · $217k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Richmond Community ToolBank | $100,000 |
| Spur Local Inc | $59,919 |
| Heritage Classic Foundation | $56,895 |
| Social and Environmental Entrepreneurs Inc | $36,999 |
| Chicago Foundation for Women | $36,296 |
| Sleep in Heavenly Peace Inc | $36,293 |
| Myriad USA Inc | $33,500 |
| G Irl | $32,295 |
| The Flow | $25,000 |
| Ready to Launch | $25,000 |
| Women in Non Traditional Employment Roles | $25,000 |
| Friends of GALA | $25,000 |
| New Village Charter School Inc | $25,000 |
| Common Counsel Foundation | $23,808 |
| Community Homeless Outreach and Support Inc | $23,719 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $2.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 74% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 507 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 6% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.9M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION2× · 2022–2023 · $97k · revenue +4%- HCHERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $88k · revenue +67%
- SISLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC2× · 2023–2024 · $68k · revenue +43%
Funded once
- WEWOMEN ENGAGED INCone grant, 2022 · $130k · revenue -48%
- BABLACKROOTS ALLIANCEgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $125k · revenue +28%
- FOFEDERATION OF SOUTHERN COOPERATIVESgraduatedone grant, 2022 · $125k · revenue +48%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…
Our mission is to protect, shelter, and empower survivors of domestic violence - offering safety, support, and resources with compassion and trauma-informed care.
The mission of Safe Voices is to provide person-to-person, individualized advocacy for all survivors of domestic abuse and violence, sex trafficking, and sexual exploitation in Androscoggin, Franklin, and Oxford Counties and engage our…
Safehouse denver assists adult, children, and youth in reclaiming their right to a life free from domestic violence. the agency provides a broad spectrum of culturally competent, trauma-informed services, including but not limited to,…
To disrupt the cycle of homelessness and nurture healing and belonging for current & future generations.
Almost Home empowers young moms to become self-sufficient and create a better future for themselves and their children.
Gilead House is a privately funded nonprofit that accepts no federal money, allowing us to remain mission driven and deeply responsive to the women and children we serve. Most of our residents are survivors of domestic violence who are…
To assure the safety and resiliency of children by strengthening families and their communities.
To provide safety, shelter and support to empower all impacted by domestic abuse, sexual violence, child abuse & trafficking.
Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…
Foster Kinship supports all kinship families throughout Nevada. We assist grandparents, relatives, and fictive kin who are raising children through five core programs: 1- Enhanced Kinship Navigator Program - Provides intensive support to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fostering Hope Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is Nannas House. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 16. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 11% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
990 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 990 of the 1,122 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WOMEN ENGAGED INC ↗
- Who funds BLACKROOTS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN COOPERATIVES ↗
- Who funds MARIJUANA JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Indigenous Justice ↗
- Who funds RICHMOND COMMUNITY TOOLBANK ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FEDERATION OF RICHMOND ↗
- Who funds EQUITY AND TRANSFORMATION ↗
- Who funds CHICAGO FOUNDATION FOR WOMEN ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds EAGLE MARKET STREETS DEVELOPMENT CO ↗
- Who funds Action Center on Race & the Economy Institute ↗
- Who funds THE NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds DC JUSTICE LAB ↗
- Who funds THE TIWAHE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HERITAGE CLASSIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds REPARATION EDUCATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds HUMANITARIAN SOCIAL INNOVATIONS ↗
- Who funds Community Aid and Development Corp ↗
- Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds THE SHARE TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENTREPRENEURS (SEE) INC ↗
- Who funds SPUR LOCAL INC ↗
- Who funds MYRIAD USA INC ↗
- Who funds From The Heart Productions ↗
- Who funds MARSHVIEW COMMUNITY ORGANIC FARM ↗
- Who funds PEACE DIRECT INC ↗
- Who funds IN HER SHOES INC ↗
- Who funds The Caraway Foundation ↗
- Who funds HABESHA Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW VENTURE FUND ↗
- Who funds HIGHLANDER RESEARCH & EDUCATION CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Our Childrens Earth Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.
Open a dossier: The Richard M Schulze Family Foundation · Vinik Family Foundation · Nashville Predators Foundation · Pinellas Community Foundation · Mascoma Bank Foundation · Newman's Own Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Rogers Family Foundation · The Saab Family Foundation · Richard L and Diane M Block Foundation · Juneau Community Foundation · Colina Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Grapevine giving foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Girl Power Rocks Inc — 22% of income from government
- Elder Care Services Inc — 22% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- The Center for Independent Documentary Inc — 6% of income from government
- Catie's Closet Inc — 4% of income from government
- Resist Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.