· Public charity
Texas Council on Family Violence Inc
Texas council on family violence is the only 501(c)3 nonprofit coalition in texas dedicated solely to creating safer communities and freedom from family violence.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k15 grants · $362k
- $50k–250k9 grants · $480k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TRAVIS COUNTY DISTRICT | $55,000 |
| FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES | $55,000 |
| EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER | $55,000 |
| THE FAMILY PLACE DALLAS | $55,000 |
| THE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATER | $55,000 |
| CROSS TIMBERS FAMILY SERVICES | $55,000 |
| EMPOWERED SURVIVOR INC | $50,000 |
| WOMEN TOGETHER FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| EL PASO COUNTY | $50,000 |
| WOMEN'S SHELTER OF EAST TEXAS INC | $30,000 |
| FREEDOM CENTER TEXAS | $30,000 |
| CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY VIOLENCE | $30,000 |
| GATEWAY FAMILY SERVICES INC | $30,000 |
| FORT BEND WOMEN'S CENTER | $30,000 |
| FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $3.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +42% since the first grant, against +27% for the ones you funded once.
60 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2025, 40 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $124k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TFThe Family Place7× · 2017–2025 · $410k · revenue +6%
- NPNOAH PROJECT INC6× · 2017–2024 · $389k · revenue +23%
- SOSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY6× · 2017–2023 · $354k · revenue +39%
Funded once
- AFASTROS FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $878k · revenue +100%
- HCHARRIS COUNTYone grant, 2018 · $75k
- DCDALLAS COUNTY ELECTIONSone grant, 2019 · $57k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The family crisis center provides intervention and advocacy for victims of sexual assault and domestic violence. this is done with counselors, court advocates and 24 hour shelter for victims and their children.
Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.
To end domestic violence in the capital area through serving victims of domestic violence, educating the public about domestic violence, and working to eliminate economic, social and cultural conditions and attitudes that contribute to…
We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…
The crisis center is committed to the prevention and elimination of domestic violence and sexual assault. we work to enhance safety and to promote equality in relationships.
Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt
Provide on-going support services for victims of domestic violence and sexual assault. support includes a safe house & 24 hour phone line.
Domestic violence victim services
Emergency shelter for victims of domestic abuse and supportive services to all victims of abuse
We will work toward the elimination of domestic violence and provide emergency and support services for survivors of domestic violence.For over 38 years, Domestic Violence Shelter and Services, Inc. (DVSS) has advanced its work to prevent…
Provide counseling, crisis intervention, 24 hour crisis hotline, advocacy, safe housing and supportive services to victims of sexual assault and domestic violence.
The mission of SafeHouse Center is to empower survivors of both sexual and intimate partner violence by providing advocacy, support, and promoting social change within our community.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freedom House and the most unlike its peers is Astros Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 14% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ASTROS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds The Family Place ↗
- Who funds NOAH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Grayson County Women's Crisis Line Inc ↗
- Who funds FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES OF AMARILLO ↗
- Who funds CROSS TIMBERS FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds DENTON COUNTY FRIENDS OF THE FAMILY INC ↗
- Who funds THE BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN TOGETHER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Friendship of Women Inc ↗
- Who funds SAFER PATH FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER ↗
- Who funds CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL AND FAMILY VIOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds Texoma Alliance to Stop Abuse ↗
- Who funds HARRIS COUNTY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COORDINATING COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds TEXAS MUSLIM WOMENS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE'S DOOR NEW BEGINNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds Houston Area Women's Center ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTER OF THE BIG BEND INC ↗
- Who funds EAST TEXAS CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WOMENS SHELTER OF EAST TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES IN CRISIS ↗
- Who funds RESOURCE & CRISIS CENTER OF GALVESTON COUNTY TEXAS ↗
- Who funds Bexar County Family Justice Center Foundation ↗
- Who funds Friends of the Family Justice Center ↗
- Who funds HILL COUNTRY CRISIS COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds WINTERGARDEN WOMEN'S SHELTER ↗
- Who funds SHIFA HEALTHCARE & COMMUNITY SERVICES USA INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN'S PROTECTIVE SERVICES ↗
- Who funds COMAL COUNTY FAMILY VIOLENCE SHELTER ↗
- Who funds FAMILY TIME CRISIS AND COUNSELING CENTER ↗
- Who funds PEOPLE'S COMMUNITY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds FREEDOM HOUSE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Astros Foundation · Texas Association Against Sexual Assault Inc · Mary Kay Ash Foundation · Texas Bar Foundation · The Moody Foundation · United Way of Greater Houston · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Houston Endowment Inc · Meadows Foundation Inc · Harris County Domestic Violence Coordinating Council · Alpha Chi Omega Foundation Inc · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Texas Council on Family Violence Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.