Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Indiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc

Icadv works for the prevention and elimination of domestic violence - until the violence ends.

$513k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$375k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0163% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.

Human Services$1.7MCrime & Legal$96kHousing & Shelter$58kHealth$44kYouth Development$5kOther$1.1M
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $17k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $121k
  • $250k+1 grant · $375k
$15,952
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRANT BLACKFORD MENTAL HEALTH INC DBA RADIANT HEALTH SERVICES$375,259
FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER ST JOSEPH COUNTY$28,558
FIREFLY CHILDREN AND FAMILY ALLIANCE$26,186
YWCA OF LAFAYETTE$22,915
TURNING POINT DOMESTICE VIOLENCE$15,952
CENTER FOR NON VIOLENCE$13,618
INDIANA LEGAL SERVICES INC$13,556
YWCA NORTHEAST INDIANA$8,934
MIDDLE WAY HOUSE$7,931
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PREVAIL INC: $98k → 5%SHELTERING WINGS: $75k → 5%FAMILY JUSTICE CENTER ST JOSEPH COUNTY: $29k → 13%CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICE CORP: $36k → 15%AURORA INC: $133k → 15%STONE BELT: $7k → 18%Council on Domestic Abuse: $12k → 19%YWCA OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $101k → 19%The Center for Women and Families: $29k → 15%PREVAIL INC: $39k → 5%SHELTERING WINGS INC: $24k → 5%CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES CORP: $24k → 15%AURORA INC: $51k → 15%Middle Way House: $11k → 18%YWCA OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $54k → 19%THE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES: $20k → 15%PREVAIL INC: $36k → 5%SHELTERING WINGS INC: $12k → 5%AURORA INC: $17k → 15%JULIAN CENTER INC: $30k → 16%MIDDLE WAY HOUSE: $8k → 18%YWCA OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $29k → 19%PREVAIL INC: $23k → 5%FAMILY PROMISE: $100k → 5%YWCA OF NORTHEAST INDIANA: $88k → 12%FIREFLY CHILDREN AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $26k → 16%YWCA OF GREATER LAFAYETTE: $28k → 19%Prevail Inc: $12k → 5%FAMILY PROMISE: $66k → 5%YWCA OF NORTHEAST INDIANA: $72k → 12%JULIAN CENTER: $24k → 16%PREVAIL INC: $8k → 5%YWCA OF NORTHEAST INDIANA: $50k → 12%JULIAN CENTER INC: $22k → 16%YWCA OF NORTHEAST INDIANA: $48k → 12%JULIAN CENTER: $14k → 16%YWCA OF NORTHEAST INDIANA: $14k → 12%JULIAN CENTER INC: $8k → 16%YWCA OF NORTHEAST INDIANA: $13k → 12%COBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN: $88k → 16%YWCA NORTHEAST INDIANA: $9k → 12%JULIAN CENTER: $6k → 16%YWCA NORTHEAST INDIANA: $6k → 12%COBURN PLACE: $34k → 16%YWCA OF NORTHEAST INDIANA: $5k → 12%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE NETWORK: $5k → 16%BEACON OF HOPE: $13k → 16%BEACON OF HOPE: $8k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.0M · 25 repeat orgs$120k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 20 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
4

Total granted

$3.0M
$29k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+41%

Still filing today

92%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $91k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCrime & LegalYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • GM
    GRANT-BLACKFORD MENTAL HEALTH INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $498k · revenue +13%
  • YN
    YWCA NORTHEAST INDIANA INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $305k · revenue +84%
  • AI
    ALTERNATIVES INCORPORATED OF MADISON COUNTY
    3× · 2021–2023 · $248k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • CO
    COUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $12k · revenue +46%
  • SB
    STONE BELT ARC INC
    one grant, 2018 · $7k · revenue +14%
  • National Network to End Domestic Violence Incgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +27%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

Health
2
A Safe Place

Emergency shelter for victims of domestic violence.

—
3
S a F E Shelter

We are committed to helping victims of sexual assault and abuse and domestic assault and abuse through advocacy support and education. We provide emergency shelter to domestic assault victims. We Also are committed to educating the public…

—
4
Crisis Intervention & Advocacy Center

Crisis intervention & advocacy center is an advocacy program designed to respond to victims of domestic abuse, sexual assualt, stalking, dating violence, and homelessness in adair, adams, clarke, dallas, decatur, guthrie, madison,…

Human Services
5
Chances & Changes Inc

To operate residential and non-residential programs for victims of domestic violence.

—
6
Ywca of Central Virginia

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, dignity, and freedom for all.

Human Services
7
Life Crisis Center Inc

To improve the quality of life in our community through crisis intervention and violence prevention.

Human Services
8
Columbus Alliance for Battered Women Inc dba Hope Harbour

Columbus alliance for battered women provides emergency shelter, security, crisis intervention, and advocacy for adult and child victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
9
Family Crisis Shelter Inc

Emergency shelter for victims of domestic abuse and supportive services to all victims of abuse

Human Services
10
Ywca Pierce County

Transforming lives through safety, healing and empowerment.

—
11
Womens Aid in Crisis Inc

Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.

Human Services
12
Beyond Violence Inc

Provide assistance to victims of domestic violence

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Center for Women and Families Inc and the most unlike its peers is Children's Bureau Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr17%19%10–20yr16%22%20–35yr14%33%35–55yr19%26%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr17%12%10–20yr16%12%20–35yr14%31%35–55yr19%45%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%1/33
the rest of the field
12%
3,909/32,097

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
31/33
Grantees still filing
26/33
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YWCA NORTHEAST INDIANA INC — $305,290 · Human ServicesYWCA NORTHEAST INDIANA INCPREVAIL INC OF HAMILTON COUNTY — $217,273 · Human ServicesPREVAIL INC OF HAMILTON COUNTYYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE — $211,453 · Human ServicesYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTEAURORA INC — $201,138 · Human ServicesAURORA INCFAMILY PROMISE OF HENDRICKS COUNTY INC — $166,063 · Human ServicesFAMILY PROMISE OF HENDRICKS COUNTY INCCOBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC — $121,904 · Human ServicesCOBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INCSHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC — $111,230 · Human ServicesSHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INCTHE JULIAN CENTER INC — $104,251 · Human ServicesTHE JULIAN CENTER INCALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC — $77,587 · Human ServicesChildren and Family Services Inc — $59,434 · Human Services+8 more — $167,450 · Human Services+8 moreGRANT-BLACKFORD MENTAL HEALTH INC — $497,902 · OtherGRANT-BLACKFORD MENTAL HEALTH INCALTERNATIVES INCORPORATED OF MADISON COUNTY — $248,183 · OtherALTERNATIVES INCORPORATED OF MADISON COUN…FAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INC — $149,539 · OtherFAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INCINDIANA COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC — $87,614 · OtherINDIANA COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INCCOLUMBUS REGIONAL SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $58,124 · OtherA BETTER WAY SERVICES INC — $39,335 · Other+2 more — $56,146 · OtherPUTNAM COUNTY FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES INC — $49,024 · Crime & LegalCENTER FOR NONVIOLENCE INC — $23,495 · Crime & LegalIndiana Legal Services Inc — $13,556 · Crime & LegalINDIANA COALITION TO END SEXUAL ASSAULT INC — $10,078 · Crime & LegalHOPE SPRINGS SAFE HOUSE INCORPORATE — $57,924 · Housing & ShelterMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF BOONE COUNTY — $44,045 · HealthNational Network to End Domestic Violence Inc — $5,049 · Youth Development
Human Services$1,743,073Other$1,136,843Crime & Legal$96,153Housing & Shelter$57,924Health$44,045Youth Development$5,049

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetGRANT-BLACKFORD MENTAL HEALTH INC — $497,902 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetYWCA NORTHEAST INDIANA INC — $305,290 over 8y, 1.9% of budgetALTERNATIVES INCORPORATED OF MADISON COUNTY — $248,183 over 3y, 7.4% of budgetPREVAIL INC OF HAMILTON COUNTY — $217,273 over 6y, 5.8% of budgetYOUNG WOMENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE — $211,453 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetAURORA INC — $201,138 over 3y, 3.8% of budgetFAMILY PROMISE OF HENDRICKS COUNTY INC — $166,063 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetFAMILY SERVICE SOCIETY INC — $149,539 over 5y, 3.0% of budgetCOBURN PLACE SAFEHAVEN II INC — $121,904 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetSHELTERING WINGS CENTER FOR WOMEN INC — $111,230 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTHE JULIAN CENTER INC — $104,251 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetINDIANA COMMUNITY ACTION ASSOCIATION INC — $87,614 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetALBION FELLOWS BACON CENTER INC — $77,587 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetChildren and Family Services Inc — $59,434 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetCOLUMBUS REGIONAL SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE — $58,124 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetHOPE SPRINGS SAFE HOUSE INCORPORATE — $57,924 over 2y, 7.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR WOMEN AND FAMILIES INC — $49,442 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetPUTNAM COUNTY FAMILY SUPPORT SERVICES INC — $49,024 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetMENTAL HEALTH AMERICA OF BOONE COUNTY — $44,045 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetA BETTER WAY SERVICES INC — $39,335 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetCRISIS CONNECTION INC — $33,231 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetFAMILY JUSTICE CENTER OF ST JOSEPH COUNTY INC — $28,558 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetCENTER FOR NONVIOLENCE INC — $23,495 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetYWCA FOUNDATION OF GREATER LAFAYETTE INC — $22,915 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetBEACON OF HOPE CENTER FOR WOMEN INC — $21,249 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetMIDDLE WAY HOUSE INC — $18,515 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCOUNCIL ON DOMESTIC ABUSE INC — $12,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetINDIANA COALITION TO END SEXUAL ASSAULT INC — $10,078 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetSTONE BELT ARC INC — $6,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNational Network to End Domestic Violence Inc — $5,049 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE NETWORK OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

More Than a Phone IncUnited Way of Central…Central Indiana Commu…Lilly Endowment IncMary Kay Ash Foundati…Duke Energy FoundationThe Brave Heart Found…Round Room Gives IncThe Indianapolis Foun…Pacers Foundation IncIndiana Youth Institu…Mibor Foundation Inc
More Than a Phone IncIN32.3× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: More Than a Phone Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Mary Kay Ash Foundation · Duke Energy Foundation · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc · Round Room Gives Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Pacers Foundation Inc · Indiana Youth Institute Inc · Mibor Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Indiana Coalition Against Domestic Violence Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines