Skip to content

Nevada · Nonprofit

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES (Nevada) receives grants from 20 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,681,701 to it, the largest being ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE ($1,867,811). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$14M
Funders on record
20
Grants received
$6.7M
Net assets
$3.3M
10/20 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 13%
01What it does

What National Council of Juvenile & Family Court Judges does

Mission

Charitable and educational purposes include: a.) improving the standards, practices, and effectiveness of courts exercising jurisdiction over families and children; b) informing or assisting those who deal with or affect these courts; c) educating persons connected with these courts and other interested members of the public in developments and principles relating to such courts; and d) engaging in educational and research activities in furtherance of the foregoing objectives.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Crime control & prevention programs: in fy 2025, the child welfare and juvenile law (cwjl) program provided training to 2,861 judges and court stakeholders and conducted 6 technical assistance requests and disseminated 1,746 publications. The cwjl is recognized for its judicial training and technical assistance in best practices for child abuse and neglect proceedings, domestic child sex trafficking, the indian child welfare act (icwa), juvenile drug treatment courts (jdtc), juvenile justice guidelines, teen dating violence, the impact of opioids on children and families, juvenile probation, community alternatives to detention, and secure placement. Cwjl maintains several related websites, webinars and publications related to child welfare and juvenile justice.

    $4,077,344 spentof which $167,565 as grants$1,327,045 earned by the program
    43% of program spending
  2. Crime control & prevention programs: the family violence and domestic relations (fvdr) program is dedicated to improving how courts and stakeholders respond to domestic violence, sexual assault, dating violence, and stalking. In fy 2025, the fvdr provided training to 4,457 judges, court professionals, and providers and conducted 412 technical assistance requests and disseminated 46 publications to 2,100 people. Fvdr continues to be recognized as a national resource for judicial training, resources, and expertise on all aspects of domestic violence and maintains several project websites that include resources such as on-demand education, webinars and toolkits. The fvdr is also the comprehensive technical assistance (ta) provider to all the ovw ta providers and operates ta2ta: the ta provider resource center (ta2ta.org) and to the judicial education development initiative on domestic violence (jedi-dv), formerly known as comprehensive training and technical assistance to judges on domestic violence.

    $3,883,342 spentof which $140,229 as grants
    41% of program spending
  3. Crime control & prevention programs: research is a vital component of ncjfcj's efforts to improve the lives of children and families. Ncjfcj's research division, the national center for juvenile justice (ncjj), is a resource for independent and original research on matters that come before juvenile and family courts. Ncjj works to improve the effectiveness and fairness of juvenile and family court systems, improve outcomes, and inform policy development. Ncjj's projects provided training or assistance for nearly 3,000 judges and others through more than 90 in-person or online events. Ncjj helped jurisdictions improve their data capacity to improve outcomes for youth, updated and added content to the online statistical briefing book ncjj.org and juvenile justice gps (jjgps.org). Ncjj also published numerous publications including: juvenile court statistics, youth and the juvenile justice system national report, and related fact sheets; bulletins, data snapshots, and ncjfcj's juvenile and family court journal.

    $1,501,447 spent
    16% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $9,462,133.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($13M) Expenses 100 ($13M) Net assets 100 ($2.1M)2018 Revenue 88 ($12M) Expenses 91 ($12M) Net assets 74 ($1.5M)2019 Revenue 92 ($12M) Expenses 85 ($11M) Net assets 112 ($2.3M)2020 Revenue 76 ($10M) Expenses 74 ($9.9M) Net assets 123 ($2.5M)2021 Revenue 77 ($10M) Expenses 75 ($10M) Net assets 130 ($2.7M)2022 Revenue 85 ($11M) Expenses 78 ($10M) Net assets 161 ($3.3M)2023 Revenue 92 ($12M) Expenses 92 ($12M) Net assets 153 ($3.2M)2024 Revenue 104 ($14M) Expenses 103 ($14M) Net assets 158 ($3.3M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (104)Expenses (103)Net assets (158)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2019 to 2020, from $3.9M to $5.6M (+46%).

$4.0M
$4.2M
$3.9M
$5.6M
$5.7M
$4.9M
$6.3M
$5.8M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 83% · 2018 86% · 2019 80% · 2020 87% · 2021 79% · 2022 81% · 2023 68% · 2024 73%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

89% of NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (95% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 270 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 4 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

−$158k
’17
−$526k
’18
$773k
’19
$190k
’20
$126k
’21
$726k
’22
−$245k
’23
−$52k
’24
1.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Joey Orduna Hastings

Chief executive officer

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed3937393536373933
Joined·+7+9+5+9+11+5+2
No longer listed·97981038
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 5 funders to 9 funders, grant income fell $545k → $430k.

3 of 20 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 3% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

Left out of every figure on this page: $1.1M from one payer (the payer shares this organization's board, largest National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Fund Inc). These are real filings, and they are not money NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES raised.

From the IRS filings of NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 28% of grant income, and it takes 3 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 3 funders to its left

69% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES.

28%
largest funder
60%
top three
~6
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 37% · 2018 63% · 2019 36% · 2020 42% · 2021 34% · 2022 29% · 2023 39% — growing more concentrated.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

42% of NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES draws 100% of its grant income from funders outside Nevada, across 12 states in all.

WA
MN
IL
NY
OR
PA
RI
CA
VA
MD
AR
DC

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Nevada out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $181k arriving through sponsors registered in 3 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES receives grants from 20 organizations whose IRS filings report $6.7M to it.

Operating margin−0% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve1.7mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)1% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 254 crime & legal nonprofits $10M–$100M, FY2024

Government funding NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $74.3M on record — $74.2M federal, $72k state.

Federal$74.2M
grants $74.2Mcontracts $0
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Top agencies
  • Department of Justice$71.2M
  • Department of Health and Human Services$3.0M
State$72k
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Top programs
  • PROF DEV DUES/MEMBERSHIP$34k
  • PROFESSIONAL SERVICES NON-IT$21k
  • PROF DEV OUT-OF-STATE TUITION/REGIST$14k
  • DUES/MEMBERSHIPS$3k

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Nevada

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

75% of spending goes to programs.

Program 75%Management 24%Fundraising 1%

Governance

25
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

99%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 28 states

NH
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
OR
OH
PA
NJ
RI
CA
UT
KY
WV
VA
MD
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
HI
MS
AL
GA
FL

Part of a family of 2 related entities

  • National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges Fund Inc · exempt
  • National Juvenile Court Foundation · exempt

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES?
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES (Nevada) receives grants from 20 organizations whose IRS filings report $6,681,701 to it, the largest being ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE ($1,867,811). 10 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES have?
IRS filings report 20 organizations giving $6,681,701 in grants to NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES, 10 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES?
ALL RISE FOR JUSTICE is the largest funder on record, with $1,867,811 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JUVENILE & FAMILY COURT JUDGES find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Nevada. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 20 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 22, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing