How much did WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI grant in FY2023?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

vocationvouchersprofessionalsexualyounghealth relationshipchildren

2019

health trainingsvouchersmotherschild careworkingyounghealth relationship

2020

covid rapidrapid responsewrap-aroundhealth trainingstestingteensschool-based

2021

healthcare workforcecompletion healthcaresex educationtwo-generation healthcareyouthhealth

2022

nursingstudent wrap-arounddegreeempoweredbetterhealthyyouth

2023

—

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2023 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$30,000

Median grant

States reached

$3.2M

Total assets

Largest grants

COAHOMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE$30,000
UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI$25,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $307k) land where the poverty rate runs at 24% — the area typically sits at 16%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 8% of WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 99% of the giving stays in MS; read by stated purpose it is 92% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPIlessmore of its giving

Placed by recipient address · 2.9% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$2.7M · 32 repeat orgs$695k to everyone else

32 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 30 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$2.7M

$695k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%

+69%

Still filing today

53%

65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationCrime & LegalPhilanthropyCivil RightsHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

PLAN A HEALTH INC
6× · 2017–2024 · $213k · revenue +275%
SPRING INITIATIVE INC
3× · 2019–2022 · $105k · revenue +7%
2ND CHANCE MS
4× · 2017–2020 · $105k · revenue +48%

Funded once

CI
CONVERGE INCgraduated
one grant, 2020 · $136k · revenue +1237%
JS
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY
one grant, 2017 · $50k
NM
NORTHEAST MISSISSIPPI COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue +98%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Mississippi Community College Foundation

To promote and encourage education in mississippi public community and junior colleges.

—

Central Mississippi Civic Improvement Association Inc

The missions is to provide quality, comprehensive primary and preventative healthcare and social services to the communities we serve. We are committed to serving the uninsured and the under insured.

Health

Mississippi County Interagency

To unite social service providers, churches, businesses, educational systems, interested citizens and local/county government representatives to better serve the needs of the citizens of misssisspi county, missouri.

Human Services

North Missindustrial Development a

Promoting northeast mississippi for industrial growth

—

Mississippi Delta Council F0R

Train and re-tool farmworkers to enter unsubsidized employment, and to provide assistance to socially and economically disadvantaged individuals

Employment

Mission Mississippi

"to encourage and demonstrate grace in the body of christ across racial lines so that communities throughout mississippi can see practical evidence of the gospel message"

Civil Rights

Working Together Mississippi

To build relationships around the state of ms to effect political change in a non-partisan way.

Education

University of Southern Mississippi

The mission of the alumni association is to benefit the university of southern mississippi, its students, and alumni through upholding traditions, sponsoring activities, events, and publications.

Education

Delta Health Alliance Inc

In alliance with Mississippi universities and other related non-profit entities, Delta Health Alliance, Inc.'s mission is to advocate, develop, and implement programs to improve the healthcare and educational needs pf the most depressed…

Health

Mississippi Association of

To advance the educational interests of mississippi, promote professional excellence amoug educators, and to advance educators interests and welfare.

—

Mississippi Methodist Hospital

Mississippi methodist rehabilitation center provides comprehensive medical rehabilitation services to help people recover abilities and quality of life after a stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neurological disease or…

Health

Higher Purpose Co

Higher Purpose Co mission is to improve intergenerational economic opportunity across Mississippi by prioritizing Black communities impacted by poverty. Our key programming pillars are Business Ownership, Food Justice, Arts/Culture,…

Community Improvement

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mississippi Center for Justice and the most unlike its peers is Midtown Partners Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%1/57

the rest of the field

10%

2,301/23,774

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

06the grantee network

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

34/34

Grantees still filing

27/34

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$1,897,523Education$400,000Human Services$392,000Crime & Legal$312,500Health$220,911Philanthropy$99,900Public Benefit$80,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation of NorthwestMS34.4× affinity14 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation of Northwest · Mississippi Humanities Council Inc · Woodward Hines Education Foundation · WK Kellogg Foundation · 2nd Chance Ms · Community Foundation for Mississippi · Jessie Smith Noyes Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Mississippi Food Network Inc · National Collegiate Athletic Association · Dollar General Literacy Foundation · Mississippi Community College Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: EXCHANGE CLUB FAMILY CENTER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

7 years of Form 990 filings, still active.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 640877906 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on EXCHANGE CLUB FAMILY CENTER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 22% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Women's Foundation of Mississippi?

Find your warmest path to Women's Foundation of Mississippi through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Women's Foundation of Mississippi?

More from the funding graph

WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF MISSISSIPPI

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where the work is directed

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

34 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Women's Foundation of Mississippi?

More from the funding graph