Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

Oxfam-America Inc

Oxfam america (oxfam or oa) is a global organization that fights inequality to end poverty and injustice.

$20M
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
9
States reached
$262k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Civil Rights$2.2MInternational$1.8MHuman Services$988kEmployment$795kEnvironment$672kPublic Benefit$533kHousing & Shelter$436kCommunity Improvement$435kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 11 grants below total $456,753 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $19,966,804 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $19,510,051 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k10 grants · $195k
  • $250k+1 grant · $262k
$20,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$71M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OXFAM AMERICA ACTION FUND$262,253
NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER$32,000
9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC$30,000
FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN COOPERATIVESLAND ASSISTANCE FUND$25,000
AGRICULTURAL MISSIONS INC$22,500
OCCIDENTAL ARTS AND ECOLOGY CENTER$20,000
DEMOCRACY IN ACTION$20,000
THE INSTITUTE FOR ENHANCED EQUITY$15,000
THE PEOPLES JUSTICE COUNCIL$10,000
STEP UP LOUISIANA ORGANIZING FUND$10,000
SOUTHERN RURAL BLACK WOMEN'S INITIATIVE FOR ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL JUSTICE$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $509k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE POWER COALITION: $55k → 17%THE LIGHTHOUSE BLACK GIRL PROJECTS: $30k → 12%NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $32k → 8%TRIBAL IMAGES MUSEUM INC: $10k → 17%NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $30k → 8%BOAT PEOPLE SOS: $22k → 19%NORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER: $25k → 8%DRESS FOR SUCCESS METRO JACKSON JACKSON MEDICAL MALL: $25k → 23%CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER: $25k → 14%URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $90k → 23%THE POWER COALITION: $25k → 23%URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $45k → 23%URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $40k → 23%URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER NEW ORLEANS: $30k → 23%URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA: $25k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MN
IL
WI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CA
MD
AR
NC
SC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX

Grants abroad, by region — $19M on the FY2025 return

Schedule F, as filed: 8 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.

Sub-Saharan Africa$6.1M · 32% · 65 grants

Stated purpose: CLIMATE JUSTICE · PRIVATE SECTOR · FOOD SYSTEMS

Central America and the Caribbean$3.5M · 18% · 14 grants

Stated purpose: GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT AND PARTNERSHIP · GENDER JUSTICE AND INCLUSION HUB · AID EFFECTIVENESS

East Asia and the Pacific$2.7M · 14% · 19 grants

Stated purpose: HUMANITARIAN · PRIVATE SECTOR · GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT AND PARTNERSHIP

Middle East and North Africa$2.7M · 14% · 10 grants

Stated purpose: KNOWLEDGE FOR IMPACT-LEAD · GENDER JUSTICE AND INCLUSION HUB · EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES

Europe (including Iceland and Greenland)$2.3M · 12% · 19 grants

Stated purpose: HUMANITARIAN · AID EFFECTIVENESS · FOOD SYSTEMS

South America$1.2M · 6% · 14 grants

Stated purpose: GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT AND PARTNERSHIP · EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES · CLIMATE JUSTICE

South Asia$851k · 4% · 7 grants

Stated purpose: HUMANITARIAN · GENDER JUSTICE AND INCLUSION HUB

North America (Canada and Mexico)$115k · 1% · 3 grants

Stated purpose: PRIVATE SECTOR · GENDER JUSTICE AND INCLUSION HUB · GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT AND PARTNERSHIP

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.0M · 41 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
56

Total granted

$6.0M
$2.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
0%

Still filing today

83%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 19% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $370k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesCivil RightsInternationalEnvironmentCommunity ImprovementPublic BenefitOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CP
    COORDINADORA PAZ PARA LA MUJER INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $402k · revenue +8%
  • AR
    AMERICAN RELIEF COALITION
    4× · 2018–2022 · $390k · revenue +125% · 66% of their budget
  • FF
    FUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT
    3× · 2018–2021 · $319k · revenue +111%

Funded once

  • SO
    STITCHING OXFAM INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2024 · $678k · revenue -11% · 43% of their budget
  • LW
    LIVING WAGE FOR US INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +39% · 33% of their budget
  • KF
    KARAM FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $85k · revenue -55%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fuerza LaboralPower of Workers

Fuerza Laboral is a workers' rights center whose mission is to shift the balance of power in our economy in favor of workers by educating, training, and organizing workers to become community leaders; taking direct action to recover unpaid…

Education
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
National Legal Advocacy Network Dba Glow

The National Legal Advocacy Network d/b/a Grassroots Law & Organizing for Workers is a legal non-profit organization dedicated to using legal strategies as a tool to build power for marginalized workers and create systemic change through…

Crime & Legal
4
Asociacion Interamericana Para La Defensa Del Ambiente

To strenghten people's ability to guarantee their individual and collective right to a healthy environment, via the development, implementation, and effective enforcement of national and international law.

Crime & Legal
5
Fair Work Center

We are workers, united across different industries to improve our working conditions and our lives. We come together as working people to build power through education, organizing, and enforcement. We work to raise and uphold standards in…

Employment
6
Corporate Accountability Lab

The Organization unleashes the creative potential of the law to protect people and the planet from corporate abuse.

International
7
Southern Coalition for Social Justice

Southern coalition for social justice partners with communities of color and economically disadvantaged communities across the south to defend and advance their political, social, and economic rights. through an intersectional and…

Crime & Legal
8
Equal Justice Center

The Equal Justice Center is a non-profit law firm and employment justice organization which empowers low-income families, workers, and communities to achieve fair treatment in the workplace, in the justice system, and in our shared society…

Civil Rights
9
Cooperation L a

The L.A. Co-op Lab is a collective that builds capacity for worker ownership in Los Angeles as a pathway toward a more equitable and democratic economy.

Arts & Culture
10
LexCollective

LexCollective is a not-for-profit organization that addresses the most extreme forms of social, racial, economic, and environmental injustices around the world, such as mass atrocities, human trafficking, environmental destruction, and…

International
11
Coalicion por Venezuela Inc

Coalicion por Venezuela Inc is a non-profit federation that unities civil society organizations dedicated to defending and promoting promote human rights, democratic values, and the social and cultural freedoms of Venezuelans and other…

Civil Rights
12
A Legacy of Equality Leadership and Organizing

LELO strives to empower low-income workers of color, recent immigrants and women workers to assert their rights, improve their working conditions and gain a voice in their workplaces, trade unions and communities, in the U.S. and across…

Crime & Legal

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centro De Los Derechos Del Migrante Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stitching Oxfam International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyImmigrant Worker SupportWomen & Girls Leadership De…Environmental Conservation …Health Access Advocacy and …Pregnancy Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsPolicy Research and Advocacy
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 22 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%6%<5yr14%14%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%18%35–55yr16%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%8%5–10yr19%28%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr13%20%35–55yr16%7%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 7% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
7%
7/105
the rest of the field
13%
240,390/1,819,460

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

97 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 97 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

11
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
24
Early backer (in before they grew)
87/97
Grantees still filing
53/97
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW WAY MISSISSIPPI INC — $605,000 · Human ServicesNEW WAY MISSISSIPPI INCCOORDINADORA PAZ PARA LA MUJER INC — $402,000 · Human ServicesCOORDINADORA PAZ PARA LA MU…URBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA — $230,000 · Human ServicesURBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANAINTER-MUJERES PUERTO RICO CORPORACION — $155,000 · Human ServicesINTER-MUJERES PUERTO RICO C…PROYECTO MATRIA INC — $121,856 · Human ServicesPROYECTO MATRIA INCBRAZOS INTERFAITH IMMIGRATION NETWORK — $95,000 · Human ServicesNORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER — $87,000 · Human ServicesONE VOICE INC — $80,000 · Human ServicesPUBLIC ALLIES INC — $80,000 · Human ServicesCOALICION DE COALICIONES PRO PERSONAS SIN HOGAR DE PUERTO RICO — $70,680 · Human Services+6 more — $132,100 · Human Services+6 moreSTITCHING OXFAM INTERNATIONAL — $678,462 · InternationalSTITCHING OXFAM INTER…AMERICAN RELIEF COALITION — $389,817 · InternationalAMERICAN RELIEF COALI…UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO LAW SCHOOL TRUST — $150,000 · InternationalUNIVERSITY OF PUERTO …COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $140,742 · InternationalCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSIS…Alianza Americas — $130,100 · InternationalAlianza AmericasSYRIAN COMMUNITY NETWORK — $54,760 · International+3 more — $60,000 · InternationalCOMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS INC — $135,000 · OtherCOMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJA…AMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION — $110,000 · OtherNorthwest Arkansas Workers Justice Center — $108,000 · OtherCENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC — $85,000 · OtherTHE INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LABOR SOCIAL AND SPIRITUAL ACTIVISM — $76,557 · OtherLimitless Vistas Inc — $159,500 · OtherLimitless Vistas IncLOYOLA UNIVERSITY — $80,000 · OtherMONGABAY ORG CORP — $112,000 · OtherKARAM FOUNDATION — $85,000 · OtherInterfaith Worker Justice — $105,000 · Other+43 more — $1,197,345 · Other+43 moreEARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INC — $300,000 · Civil RightsEARTHRIGHTS …OXFAM AMERICA ACTION FUND INC — $262,253 · Civil RightsOXFAM AMERIC…MISSISSIPPI COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION — $110,000 · Civil RightsMISSISSIPPI …NATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK — $75,000 · Civil RightsNATIONAL DAY…National Domestic Workers Alliance Inc — $50,000 · Civil RightsPeoples Institute For Survival and Beyond — $35,000 · Civil RightsFARMWORKER JUSTICE FUND INC — $35,000 · Civil RightsINSTITUTE FOR ENHANCED EQUITY — $33,750 · Civil Rights+4 more — $72,000 · Civil Rights+4 moreFUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT — $319,040 · Public BenefitFUND FOR C…National Coalition on Black Civic Partic — $308,000 · Public BenefitNational C…One Voice — $110,200 · Public BenefitOne VoiceESPACIOS ABIERTOS PUERTO RICO INC — $38,250 · Public Benefit+1 more — $10,000 · Public BenefitDEPENDABLE SOURCE CORP CENTER FOR COMMUNITY & WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT — $280,600 · Community ImprovementHASER Inc — $100,000 · Community ImprovementPOWERSWITCH ACTION — $30,000 · Community ImprovementHigher Purpose Hub — $25,000 · Community ImprovementNEW ALPHA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $25,000 · Community ImprovementCAPITALPLUS EXCHANGE CORPORATION — $17,700 · Community ImprovementWESTERN NORTH CAROLINA WORKERS CENTER — $180,750 · EmploymentGREATER MINNESOTA WORKER CENTER — $150,000 · EmploymentLIVING WAGE FOR US INC — $100,000 · EmploymentFOOD CHAIN WORKERS ALLIANCE — $35,000 · Employment
Human Services$2,058,636International$1,603,881Other$2,253,402Civil Rights$973,003Public Benefit$785,490Community Improvement$478,300Employment$465,750

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTITCHING OXFAM INTERNATIONAL — $678,462 over 1y, 43% of budgetNEW WAY MISSISSIPPI INC — $605,000 over 5y, 24% of budgetCOORDINADORA PAZ PARA LA MUJER INC — $402,000 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetAMERICAN RELIEF COALITION — $389,817 over 4y, 66% of budgetFUND FOR CONSTITUTIONAL GOVERNMENT — $319,040 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetNational Coalition on Black Civic Partic — $308,000 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetEARTHRIGHTS INTERNATIONAL INC — $300,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetDEPENDABLE SOURCE CORP CENTER FOR COMMUNITY & WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT — $280,600 over 5y, 25% of budgetOXFAM AMERICA ACTION FUND INC — $262,253 over 1y, 43% of budgetURBAN LEAGUE OF LOUISIANA — $230,000 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetWESTERN NORTH CAROLINA WORKERS CENTER — $180,750 over 5y, 20% of budgetLimitless Vistas Inc — $159,500 over 3y, 11% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO LAW SCHOOL TRUST — $150,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetGREATER MINNESOTA WORKER CENTER — $150,000 over 4y, 50% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $140,742 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMITE DE APOYO A LOS TRABAJADORES AGRICOLAS INC — $135,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetAlianza Americas — $130,100 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPROYECTO MATRIA INC — $121,856 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetMONGABAY ORG CORP — $112,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOne Voice — $110,200 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetMISSISSIPPI COALITION ON BLACK CIVIC PARTICIPATION — $110,000 over 2y, 3.2% of budgetAMERICAN PHARMACISTS ASSOCIATION — $110,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetNorthwest Arkansas Workers Justice Center — $108,000 over 2y, 35% of budgetInterfaith Worker Justice — $105,000 over 2y, 13% of budgetLIVING WAGE FOR US INC — $100,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetHASER Inc — $100,000 over 3y, 5.5% of budgetBRAZOS INTERFAITH IMMIGRATION NETWORK — $95,000 over 3y, 38% of budgetNORTH CAROLINA JUSTICE CENTER — $87,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetKARAM FOUNDATION — $85,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCENTRO DE LOS DERECHOS DEL MIGRANTE INC — $85,000 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetONE VOICE INC — $80,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetPUBLIC ALLIES INC — $80,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLOYOLA UNIVERSITY — $80,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR LABOR SOCIAL AND SPIRITUAL ACTIVISM — $76,557 over 2y, 29% of budgetNATIONAL DAY LABORER ORGANIZING NETWORK — $75,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetCOALICION DE COALICIONES PRO PERSONAS SIN HOGAR DE PUERTO RICO — $70,680 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetKILOMETRO 0 INC — $62,250 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetADC RESEARCH INSTITUTE — $55,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetSYRIAN COMMUNITY NETWORK — $54,760 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetA BETTER BALANCE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetNational Domestic Workers Alliance Inc — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget9TO5 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF WORKING WOMEN INC — $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRESILIENT POWER PUERTO RICO INC — $50,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetMISSISSIPPI CENTER FOR JUSTICE — $45,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMAYOR'S HEALTHY CITY INITIATIVE — $40,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetPROJECT SOUTH INC — $40,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFAMILIES PLANNING ASSOCIATION OF PUERTO RICO — $38,250 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetESPACIOS ABIERTOS PUERTO RICO INC — $38,250 over 1y, 8.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Amalgamated Charitabl…WK Kellogg FoundationNew Venture FundThe Ford FoundationThe David and Lucile …Foundation for Louisi…NEO Philanthropy IncRockefeller Family Fu…Windward FundWellspring Philanthro…ImpactassetsincRockefeller Philanthr…
Amalgamated Charitable Foundation IncDC47.9× affinity32 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · WK Kellogg Foundation · New Venture Fund · The Ford Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · Foundation for Louisiana · NEO Philanthropy Inc · Rockefeller Family Fund Inc · Windward Fund · Wellspring Philanthropic Fund Inc · Impactassetsinc · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Oxfam-America Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 24%
  • National Florence Crittenton Mission — 24% of income from government
  • Centro De Los Derechos Del Migrante Inc — 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
21report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to Oxfam-America Inc?

Find your warmest path to Oxfam-America Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 105 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home