· Community foundation
Women's Foundation of Minnesota
Women's Foundation of Minnesota is a statewide community foundation investing in ending systemic inequities and driving innovation for gender and racial justice.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 90 grants below total $3,911,298 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $4,194,063 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $282,765 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k6 grants · $41k
- $10k–50k61 grants · $1.2M
- $50k–250k22 grants · $2.3M
- $250k+1 grant · $340k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| A Call to Men | $340,000 |
| Dunwoody College of Technology | $200,000 |
| Minnesota North College | $200,000 |
| Bemidji State Alumni & Foundation | $200,000 |
| Minneapolis College Foundation | $200,000 |
| Minnesota State Community & Technical College | $150,000 |
| Friends of Saint Paul College | $150,000 |
| YWCA St Paul | $144,122 |
| Hope Community | $100,000 |
| Possibility Labs | $100,000 |
| Neighborhood Development Center Inc | $100,000 |
| Healing Justice Foundation | $100,000 |
| YWCA Mankato | $88,550 |
| Ain Dah Yung Center | $70,000 |
| Ann Bancroft Foundation | $68,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $4.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 14% of Women's Foundation of Minnesota’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 86% of the giving stays in MN; read by stated purpose it is 77% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
153 repeat relationships — 57 still active in FY2025, 96 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ACACTM CORP3× · 2023–2025 · $1.0M · revenue +44%
- DCDUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY4× · 2018–2025 · $554k · revenue +71%
- TLTHE LINK7× · 2018–2024 · $486k · revenue +100%
Funded once
- SFSOUTHSIDE FAMILY CHARTER SCHOOLone grant, 2024 · $324k · revenue +20%
- SPSAINT PAUL PUBLIC SCHOOLSone grant, 2018 · $50k
- NTNorthwest Technical College - Bemidji Foundationone grant, 2018 · $50k · revenue -15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Minnesota Voice is a collaboration of organizations working toward permanent change in social, racial, and economic justice by increasing civic engagement and voter participation across the state.
To advance the success of women attorneys and strive for a just society.
Grow businesses, build wealth and increase reinvestement in the african communities of minnesota
To improve lives by ending domestic violence.
To develop and advocate for public policy that makes Minnesota's economy more prosperous and fair for all Minnesotans.
Leadership matters mn is focused on advancing a policy agenda that places working minnesotans first. we support economic growth, job creation and equitable tax and education policies that will allow every minnesotan to thrive.
The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…
United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.
MinnPost produces independent journalism to serve as a trusted guide for Minnesotans exploring the critical issues, challenges and opportunities facing our state.
Protect Minnesota promotes a culture of health and safety for all Minnesotans by preventing gun violence through research education advocacy and community investment. We emphasize prevention using a public health model and we seek to build…
Youthprise is a nonprofit intermediary that invests in the future of Minnesota by investing in youth. Youthprise's mission is to increase equity with and for Minnesota's indigenous, low-income, and racially diverse youth.
Move minnesota leads the movement for an equitable and sustainable transportation system that puts people first. we are passionate about connecting communities, ending the climate crisis, expanding access to jobs and resources, and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Restoration for All Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kellogg Fellows Leadership Alliance Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
268 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 268 of the 299 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Young Women's Christian Association of St Paul ↗
- Who funds ACTM CORP ↗
- Who funds DUNWOODY COLLEGE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK WOMEN'S FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE LINK ↗
- Who funds MEN AS PEACEMAKERS ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA ZOO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF SAINT PAUL COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds OUR JUSTICE ↗
- Who funds SOUTHSIDE FAMILY CHARTER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Kwanzaa Community Church PCUSA Liberty Community Church PCUSA ↗
- Who funds NEXUS COMMUNITY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds OUTFRONT MINNESOTA COMMUNITY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds SAINT PAUL & MINNESOTA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR VICTIMS OF TORTURE ↗
- Who funds CENTRO TYRONE GUZMAN ↗
- Who funds HOPE COMMUNITY INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNIDADES LATINAS UNIDAS EN SERVICO INC ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds MINNEAPOLIS COMMUNITY & TECHNICAL COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BEMIDJI STATE UNIVERSITY ALUMNI AND FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MINNESOTA PUBLIC RADIO AMERICAN PUBLIC MEDIA ↗
- Who funds HMONG AMERICAN PARTNERSHIP ↗
- Who funds DAKOTA WICOHAN ↗
- Who funds MIGIZI Communications Inc ↗
- Who funds Family Tree Inc ↗
- Who funds ST PAUL YOUTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF DULUTH ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD MINNESOTA NORTH DAKOTA SOUTH DAKOTA ↗
- Who funds YWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS ↗
- Who funds Firecracker Foundation ↗
- Who funds SEAD PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ANN BANCROFT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AIN DAH YUNG (OUR HOME) CENTER ↗
- Who funds DISCAPACITADOS ABRIENDOSE CAMINOS ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · Headwaters Foundation for Justice · The Minneapolis Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Fr Bigelow Foundation · Greater Twin Cities United Way · The McKnight Foundation · Youthprise · Mardag Foundation · The Bush Foundation · Medica Foundation · Pohlad Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Women's Foundation of Minnesota funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Center for Effective Philanthropy Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.