· Private foundation
The Lynch Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k44 grants · $950k
- $50k–250k46 grants · $4.4M
- $250k+8 grants · $2.9M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LAWRENCE CATHOLIC ACADEMY | $512,576 |
| MISSION GRAMMAR SCHOOL | $510,576 |
| CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF ROXBURY | $400,000 |
| FIDELITY CHARITABLE | $400,000 |
| HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL | $300,000 |
| ESPERANZA ACADEMY | $250,000 |
| FAMILYAID BOSTON | $250,000 |
| ST MARY'S CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN | $250,000 |
| PARTNERS IN HEALTH | $225,000 |
| YMCA OF THE NORTH SHORE | $200,000 |
| I2 LEARNING FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| PINE STREET INN | $167,000 |
| BENJAMIN FRANKLIN CUMMINGS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY | $150,000 |
| CITIZENS HOUSING AND PLANNING ASSOCIATION | $150,000 |
| FATHER'S UPLIFT | $150,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $4.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.
157 repeat relationships — 81 still active in FY2024, 76 since wound down; 24 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.7M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CSCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC7× · 2017–2024 · $7.5M · revenue +67%
TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE8× · 2017–2024 · $3.3M · revenue +70%
THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS6× · 2018–2023 · $1.1M · revenue +58%
Funded once
- CSCATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATIONINNER-CITY SCHOLARSHIP FUNDone grant, 2018 · $1.6M
ROSE FITZGERALD KENNEDY GREENWAY CONSERVANCY INCone grant, 2017 · $760k · revenue +10%- RKROSE KENNEDY GREENWAY CONSERVANCYone grant, 2018 · $650k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…
Bb&n, an all gender day school in cambridge, massachusetts, was established in 1974 by the merger of two independent schools, the buckingham school and the browne & nichols school, founded respectively in 1889 and 1883. located on multiple…
Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…
Dean college is a private, residential new england college grounded in a culture and tradition that all students deserve the opportunity to discover and exceed their greatest aspirations. a personal and transformative community since 1865,…
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
The principal intent of the organization is to conduct activities to advance education reform in public schools, including public charter schools. specifically, the organization will engage in activities to support and transform…
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Childrens Museum and the most unlike its peers is The Drexel Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
159 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 159 of the 292 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CATHOLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON SCHOOLS FUND ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds PEABODY ESSEX MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF RESERVATIONS ↗
- Who funds St Mary's Center for Women & Children Inc ↗
- Who funds ROSE FITZGERALD KENNEDY GREENWAY CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PINE STREET INN INC ↗
- Who funds ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds UNCORNERED INC ↗
- Who funds My Brothers Keeper Inc ↗
- Who funds CAMBRIDGE COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds HomeStart Inc ↗
- Who funds INNERCITY WEIGHTLIFTING INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds BOSTON CELTICS SHAMROCK FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S SERVICES OF ROXBURY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds NOTRE DAME CRISTO REY HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR EARLY EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds i2 LEARNING FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FATHERS UPLIFT INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds EDNAVIGATOR INC ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds CAMP HARBOR VIEW FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boston Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Highland Street Connection and Subsidiaries · Yawkey Foundation II · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Fidelity Foundation · Riley Mabel Louise Tr Uwill · Barr Foundation · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · The Cabot Family Charitable Trust · Bushrod H Campbell & Adah F Hall Charity Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Lynch Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Hopewell Inc — 83% of income from government
- East Boston Social Centers Inc — 50% of income from government
- Boston Harbor Now Inc — 45% of income from government
- Cardinal Cushing Centers Inc — 40% of income from government
- St Mary's Center for Women & Children Inc — 40% of income from government
- Children's Services of Roxbury Inc — 35% of income from government
- Neighborhood Villages Inc — 33% of income from government
- Citizens' Housing and Planning Association Inc — 26% of income from government
- More Than Words Inc — 24% of income from government
- Uncornered Inc — 24% of income from government
- United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
- Fathers Uplift Incorporated — 22% of income from government
- HomeStart Inc — 20% of income from government
- Saint Francis House Inc — 18% of income from government
- Sociedad Latina Inc — 15% of income from government
- Boston After School & Beyond Inc — 15% of income from government
- Nashoba Learning Group Inc — 14% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Action for Boston Community Development Inc — 11% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Elizabeth Seton Residence Inc — 9% of income from government
- Lawrence Communityworks Inc — 9% of income from government
- Boston Debate League Incorporated — 7% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Dorchester Inc — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Ymca of the North Shore Inc — 6% of income from government
- Gosnold Inc — 5% of income from government
- Benjamin Franklin Cummings Institute of Technology — 5% of income from government
- Familyaid Boston Inc — 4% of income from government
- Cabot Performing Arts Center Inc — 3% of income from government
- Third Sector New England Inc — 3% of income from government
- Peabody Essex Museum Inc — 3% of income from government
- Bay Path University — 3% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston College — 3% of income from government
- Society for the Preservation of New Engl — 2% of income from government
- Regis College — 2% of income from government
- Artists for Humanity Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
- The Red Sox Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- Inquilinos Boricuas En Accion Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boston Celtics Shamrock Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Childrens Museum — 1% of income from government
- Camp Harbor View Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Crossroads for Kids Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Baseball Inc — 1% of income from government
- Cambridge College Inc — 1% of income from government
- Boston Youth Symphony Orchestras Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Achievement Network Ltd — 1% of income from government
- Friends of the Public Garden Inc — 1% of income from government
- Edvestors Inc — 1% of income from government
- Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy Greenway Conservancy Inc — 1% of income from government
- Hope and Comfort Inc — 1% of income from government
- New England Wildlife Center Inc — 1% of income from government
- Community Music Center of Boston Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Possible Project Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Historic Deerfield Inc — 0% of income from government
- Museum of Science — 0% of income from government
- Emmanuel College — 0% of income from government
- Museum of Fine Arts — 0% of income from government
- Philanthropy Massachusetts Inc — 0% of income from government
- Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Milton Academy — 0% of income from government
- Cotting School Inc — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Lynch Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Lynch Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.