· Public charity
Brown University
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 235 grants below total $46,972,985 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $450,866,117 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $403,893,132 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k9 grants · $69k
- $10k–50k73 grants · $1.9M
- $50k–250k99 grants · $12M
- $250k+54 grants · $33M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL - OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINIS | $3,357,445 |
| AMERICAN HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION | $1,698,978 |
| INDIANA UNIVERSITY - OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRA | $1,696,187 |
| HEBREW REHABILITATION CENTER | $1,146,797 |
| UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER - ORACS | $1,055,841 |
| JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY | $1,033,263 |
| UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH - OFFICE OF RESEARCHCOST | $994,642 |
| UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND - RESEARCH AND ECONOMIC | $988,526 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT - OFFICE FOR SPONSORED P | $874,706 |
| BUTLER HOSPITAL - GRANTS ADMINISTRATION | $779,139 |
| NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE | $756,678 |
| REGENTS OF UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA | $728,479 |
| REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN | $679,737 |
| SALK INSTITUTE OF BIOLOGICAL STUDIES | $657,094 |
| YALE UNIVERSITY - GRANTS AND CONTRACT FINANCIAL AD | $653,390 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $1.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
271 repeat relationships — 165 still active in FY2025, 106 since wound down; 26 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
Rhode Island Hospital9× · 2017–2025 · $20M · revenue +68%- HRHebrew Rehabilitation Center8× · 2017–2025 · $8.8M · revenue +32%
The Miriam Hospital9× · 2017–2025 · $6.8M · revenue +59%
Funded once
- EMECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION INCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $994k · revenue +44%
- FRFermi Research Alliance LLCgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $786k · revenue +72%
- CIChimerix Incone grant, 2023 · $464k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
We educate the next generation of leaders to improve the health of our society.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Seton hall university is a catholic institution of higher education
Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Northeastern University and the most unlike its peers is Gates Foundation Trust. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 53 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
238 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 238 of the 401 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Rhode Island Hospital ↗
- Who funds Hebrew Rehabilitation Center ↗
- Who funds The Miriam Hospital ↗
- Who funds Yale University ↗
- Who funds BUTLER HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE VEBA TRUST ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
- Who funds RHODE ISLAND QUALITY INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds Temple University - Of The Commonwealth System of Higher Education ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY ↗
- Who funds The Salk Institute for Biological Studies ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds FENWAY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds WOMEN & INFANTS HOSPITAL OF RI ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Yale University · Trustees of Boston University · The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York · Johns Hopkins University · University of Pittsburgh · Vanderbilt University Medical Center · The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia · Mayo Clinic · The George Washington University · Cornell University · Northwestern University · American Heart Association Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Brown University funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Education Development Center Inc — 65% of income from government
- Hebrew Rehabilitation Center — 53% of income from government
- Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Inc — 37% of income from government
- Joslin Diabetes Center Inc — 35% of income from government
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology — 35% of income from government
- Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation — 32% of income from government
- University of Delaware — 30% of income from government
- Fenway Community Health Center Inc — 27% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- The Broad Institute Inc — 19% of income from government
- Gloucester Marine Genomics Institute Incorporated — 16% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- Johns Hopkins University — 12% of income from government
- The Trustees of the Stevens Institute of Technology — 12% of income from government
- Yale University — 12% of income from government
- The Trustees of Princeton University — 11% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
- Worcester Polytechnic Institute — 8% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Northeastern University — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Mystic Seaport Museum Inc — 5% of income from government
- The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
- Wellesley College — 1% of income from government
- Oregon Health & Science University Foundation — 1% of income from government
- Hebrew Senior Life Inc — 0% of income from government
- Amherst College Trustees — 0% of income from government
- Williams College — 0% of income from government
- Portland State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.